The BinaxNOW pneumococcal antigen test: An adjunct for diagnosis of pneumococcal bacteraemia.

IF 1.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2021-04-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajid.v36i1.244
Hafsah D Tootla, Colleen Bamford, Chad M Centner, Clinton Moodley
{"title":"The BinaxNOW pneumococcal antigen test: An adjunct for diagnosis of pneumococcal bacteraemia.","authors":"Hafsah D Tootla,&nbsp;Colleen Bamford,&nbsp;Chad M Centner,&nbsp;Clinton Moodley","doi":"10.4102/sajid.v36i1.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Culture remains the diagnostic standard for <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> bacteraemia but is limited by time to identification, prior antibiotics and bacterial autolysis. Culture-independent methods for detecting <i>S. pneumoniae</i> include PCR and antigen tests. We evaluated an antigen test on blood culture broth for the rapid detection of <i>S. pneumoniae</i> bacteraemia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We collected 212 signal-positive blood cultures, with gram-positive cocci in pairs, chains or with uncertain morphology. The BinaxNOW <i>S. pneumoniae</i> urinary antigen test, Gram stain, culture and <i>lytA</i> PCR were performed on all samples. Diagnostic accuracy of the antigen test and Gram stain with gram-positive cocci in pairs were compared with culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the composite of culture and PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> was isolated in 26% of samples, 66% cultured other gram-positive organisms and 8% of samples had no growth. Sensitivity and negative predictive values of the antigen test were 100%, specificity and positive predictive values were 87% - 88% and 76% - 81%, but increased to 93% - 96% and 96% - 98% when applied to subsets with gram-positive cocci in pairs, or history compatible with respiratory illness or meningitis. Sensitivity (69% - 75%) and specificity (81%) of Gram stain (gram-positive cocci in pairs) were lower than the antigen test even when applied to the same subsets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate and rapid diagnosis of <i>S. pneumoniae</i> bacteraemia is challenging. Specificity of this antigen test is limited by cross-reactivity with other gram-positive organisms, but could be improved if Gram stain morphology and clinical history are available. The antigen test is a useful adjunct for rapid diagnosis of <i>S. pneumoniae</i> bacteraemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":44007,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"36 1","pages":"244"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378051/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v36i1.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Culture remains the diagnostic standard for Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteraemia but is limited by time to identification, prior antibiotics and bacterial autolysis. Culture-independent methods for detecting S. pneumoniae include PCR and antigen tests. We evaluated an antigen test on blood culture broth for the rapid detection of S. pneumoniae bacteraemia.

Method: We collected 212 signal-positive blood cultures, with gram-positive cocci in pairs, chains or with uncertain morphology. The BinaxNOW S. pneumoniae urinary antigen test, Gram stain, culture and lytA PCR were performed on all samples. Diagnostic accuracy of the antigen test and Gram stain with gram-positive cocci in pairs were compared with culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the composite of culture and PCR.

Results: Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated in 26% of samples, 66% cultured other gram-positive organisms and 8% of samples had no growth. Sensitivity and negative predictive values of the antigen test were 100%, specificity and positive predictive values were 87% - 88% and 76% - 81%, but increased to 93% - 96% and 96% - 98% when applied to subsets with gram-positive cocci in pairs, or history compatible with respiratory illness or meningitis. Sensitivity (69% - 75%) and specificity (81%) of Gram stain (gram-positive cocci in pairs) were lower than the antigen test even when applied to the same subsets.

Conclusion: Accurate and rapid diagnosis of S. pneumoniae bacteraemia is challenging. Specificity of this antigen test is limited by cross-reactivity with other gram-positive organisms, but could be improved if Gram stain morphology and clinical history are available. The antigen test is a useful adjunct for rapid diagnosis of S. pneumoniae bacteraemia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

BinaxNOW肺炎球菌抗原试验:诊断肺炎球菌菌血症的辅助手段。
背景:培养仍然是肺炎链球菌菌血症的诊断标准,但受时间、既往抗生素和细菌自溶的限制。非培养检测肺炎链球菌的方法包括PCR和抗原检测。我们评价了血培养液抗原检测快速检测肺炎链球菌菌血症的方法。方法:收集212例革兰氏阳性血培养,革兰氏阳性球菌成对、链状或形态不确定。所有标本行BinaxNOW肺炎链球菌尿抗原检测、革兰氏染色、培养和lytA PCR。比较革兰氏阳性球菌抗原试验和革兰氏染色对革兰氏阳性球菌的诊断准确性,并与培养、聚合酶链反应(PCR)及培养与PCR复合方法进行比较。结果:26%的样品分离出肺炎链球菌,66%的样品培养出其他革兰氏阳性菌,8%的样品未生长。抗原检测的敏感性和阴性预测值为100%,特异性和阳性预测值分别为87% - 88%和76% - 81%,但当用于革兰氏阳性球菌成对亚群或与呼吸系统疾病或脑膜炎相容的病史时,敏感性和阴性预测值分别为93% - 96%和96% - 98%。革兰氏染色(成对的革兰氏阳性球菌)的敏感性(69% - 75%)和特异性(81%)即使应用于相同的亚群,也低于抗原试验。结论:准确、快速诊断肺炎链球菌菌血症具有一定的挑战性。这种抗原测试的特异性受限于与其他革兰氏阳性菌的交叉反应性,但如果有革兰氏染色形态学和临床病史,则可以提高特异性。抗原检测是快速诊断肺炎链球菌菌血症的有效辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信