The Effects of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Selection, Purchase, and Consumption of Food and Drink Products: A Systematic Review.

IF 5.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environment and Behavior Pub Date : 2021-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-20 DOI:10.1177/0013916521995473
Christina Potter, Anastasios Bastounis, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce, Cristina Stewart, Kerstin Frie, Kate Tudor, Filippo Bianchi, Emma Cartwright, Brian Cook, Mike Rayner, Susan A Jebb
{"title":"The Effects of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Selection, Purchase, and Consumption of Food and Drink Products: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Christina Potter, Anastasios Bastounis, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce, Cristina Stewart, Kerstin Frie, Kate Tudor, Filippo Bianchi, Emma Cartwright, Brian Cook, Mike Rayner, Susan A Jebb","doi":"10.1177/0013916521995473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review assessed the effects of environmental labels on consumers' demand for more sustainable food products. Six electronic databases were searched for experimental studies of ecolabels and food choices. We followed standard Cochrane methods and results were synthesized using vote counting. Fifty-six studies (<i>N</i> = 42,768 participants, 76 interventions) were included. Outcomes comprised selection (<i>n</i> = 14), purchase (<i>n</i> = 40) and consumption (<i>n</i> = 2). The ecolabel was presented as text (<i>n</i> = 36), logo (<i>n</i> = 13) or combination (<i>n</i> = 27). Message types included: organic (<i>n</i> = 25), environmentally sustainable (<i>n</i> = 27), greenhouse gas emissions (<i>n</i> = 17), and assorted \"other\" message types (<i>n</i> = 7). Ecolabels were tested in actual (<i>n</i> = 15) and hypothetical (<i>n</i> = 41) environments. Thirty-nine studies received an unclear or high RoB rating. Sixty comparisons favored the intervention and 16 favored control. Ecolabeling with a variety of messages and formats was associated with the selection and purchase of more sustainable food products.</p>","PeriodicalId":48374,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916521995473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review assessed the effects of environmental labels on consumers' demand for more sustainable food products. Six electronic databases were searched for experimental studies of ecolabels and food choices. We followed standard Cochrane methods and results were synthesized using vote counting. Fifty-six studies (N = 42,768 participants, 76 interventions) were included. Outcomes comprised selection (n = 14), purchase (n = 40) and consumption (n = 2). The ecolabel was presented as text (n = 36), logo (n = 13) or combination (n = 27). Message types included: organic (n = 25), environmentally sustainable (n = 27), greenhouse gas emissions (n = 17), and assorted "other" message types (n = 7). Ecolabels were tested in actual (n = 15) and hypothetical (n = 41) environments. Thirty-nine studies received an unclear or high RoB rating. Sixty comparisons favored the intervention and 16 favored control. Ecolabeling with a variety of messages and formats was associated with the selection and purchase of more sustainable food products.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

环境可持续性标签对食品和饮料产品的选择、购买和消费的影响:系统回顾
本综述评估了环境标签对消费者需求更多可持续食品的影响。我们在六个电子数据库中搜索了有关生态标签和食品选择的实验研究。我们采用了标准的 Cochrane 方法,并通过计票对结果进行了综合。共纳入 56 项研究(N = 42,768 名参与者,76 项干预措施)。结果包括选择(14 人)、购买(40 人)和消费(2 人)。生态标签以文字(n = 36)、徽标(n = 13)或组合(n = 27)的形式呈现。信息类型包括:有机(n = 25)、环境可持续(n = 27)、温室气体排放(n = 17)和各种 "其他 "信息类型(n = 7)。生态标签在实际(15 个)和假设(41 个)环境中进行了测试。有 39 项研究的 RoB 评分不明确或较高。有 60 项比较倾向于干预,16 项倾向于对照。各种信息和形式的生态标签与选择和购买更多可持续食品有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Environment & Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal designed to report rigorous experimental and theoretical work focusing on the influence of the physical environment on human behavior at the individual, group, and institutional levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信