Effectiveness of a Continuity-of-Care Model to Reduce Youth Suicidality.

Crisis Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-31 DOI:10.1027/0227-5910/a000818
Elizabeth Sale, Amanpreet Singh Sandhu, Shannon VonDras
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Continuity-of-Care Model to Reduce Youth Suicidality.","authors":"Elizabeth Sale, Amanpreet Singh Sandhu, Shannon VonDras","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Suicidal ideation and recent suicide attempts greatly increase the risk of suicide among youth. Many youth experiencing suicidality are not adequately connected to in-person treatment. Aims: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of a continuity-of-care approach in reducing suicide attempts, ideation, and related hospital and emergency department (ED) visits among youth at high risk for suicide. Method: Data on suicidal ideation, attempts, and related hospital and ED visits were collected over a 6-month period for youth under age 25 (n = 376). One-way repeated measures ANOVA and Cochran's Q tests assessed change from intake at the 3- and 6-month follow-up. Results: Youth had significantly fewer suicide attempts and related hospital and ED visits at both 3- and 6-month timepoints. Suicidal ideation decreased to 52% from intake to 6-month follow-up. Limitations: This study lacked a comparison population to examine continuity-of-care versus treatment-as-usual. Furthermore, the study did not extend beyond 6 months, limiting the ability to assess the intervention's long-term effectiveness. Conclusion: This youth-focused continuity-of-care model reduced suicidal ideation and related behaviors. Further studies should utilize control groups to confirm the validity of these results.","PeriodicalId":520108,"journal":{"name":"Crisis","volume":" ","pages":"486-492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Suicidal ideation and recent suicide attempts greatly increase the risk of suicide among youth. Many youth experiencing suicidality are not adequately connected to in-person treatment. Aims: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of a continuity-of-care approach in reducing suicide attempts, ideation, and related hospital and emergency department (ED) visits among youth at high risk for suicide. Method: Data on suicidal ideation, attempts, and related hospital and ED visits were collected over a 6-month period for youth under age 25 (n = 376). One-way repeated measures ANOVA and Cochran's Q tests assessed change from intake at the 3- and 6-month follow-up. Results: Youth had significantly fewer suicide attempts and related hospital and ED visits at both 3- and 6-month timepoints. Suicidal ideation decreased to 52% from intake to 6-month follow-up. Limitations: This study lacked a comparison population to examine continuity-of-care versus treatment-as-usual. Furthermore, the study did not extend beyond 6 months, limiting the ability to assess the intervention's long-term effectiveness. Conclusion: This youth-focused continuity-of-care model reduced suicidal ideation and related behaviors. Further studies should utilize control groups to confirm the validity of these results.
持续照护模式降低青少年自杀率的有效性。
背景:自杀意念和最近的自杀企图大大增加了青少年自杀的风险。许多有自杀倾向的青少年没有充分接受面对面的治疗。目的:本研究旨在确定连续性护理方法在减少自杀企图、自杀意念和相关的医院和急诊科(ED)就诊在自杀高风险青少年中的有效性。方法:收集25岁以下青少年在6个月内的自杀意念、企图、相关的医院和急诊科就诊数据(n = 376)。在3个月和6个月的随访中,单向重复测量方差分析和科克伦Q测试评估了摄入后的变化。结果:在3个月和6个月的时间点上,青少年的自杀企图和相关的医院和急诊科就诊明显减少。从摄入到6个月的随访,自杀意念下降到52%。局限性:本研究缺乏比较人群来检查连续性护理与常规治疗。此外,该研究没有超过6个月,限制了评估干预措施长期有效性的能力。结论:这种以青少年为中心的持续护理模式减少了自杀意念和相关行为。进一步的研究应利用对照组来证实这些结果的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信