Anaesthetic depth and delirium after major surgery: a randomised clinical trial

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Lisbeth A. Evered , Matthew T.V. Chan , Ruquan Han , Mandy H.M. Chu , Benny P. Cheng , David A. Scott , Kane O. Pryor , Daniel I. Sessler , Robert Veselis , Christopher Frampton , Matthew Sumner , Ade Ayeni , Paul S. Myles , Douglas Campbell , Kate Leslie , Timothy G. Short
{"title":"Anaesthetic depth and delirium after major surgery: a randomised clinical trial","authors":"Lisbeth A. Evered ,&nbsp;Matthew T.V. Chan ,&nbsp;Ruquan Han ,&nbsp;Mandy H.M. Chu ,&nbsp;Benny P. Cheng ,&nbsp;David A. Scott ,&nbsp;Kane O. Pryor ,&nbsp;Daniel I. Sessler ,&nbsp;Robert Veselis ,&nbsp;Christopher Frampton ,&nbsp;Matthew Sumner ,&nbsp;Ade Ayeni ,&nbsp;Paul S. Myles ,&nbsp;Douglas Campbell ,&nbsp;Kate Leslie ,&nbsp;Timothy G. Short","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2021.07.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Postoperative delirium is a serious complication of surgery associated with prolonged hospitalisation, long-term cognitive decline, and mortality. This study aimed to determine whether targeting bispectral index (BIS) readings of 50 (light anaesthesia) was associated with a lower incidence of POD than targeting BIS readings of 35 (deep anaesthesia).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This multicentre randomised clinical trial of 655 at-risk patients undergoing major surgery from eight centres in three countries assessed delirium for 5 days postoperatively using the 3 min confusion assessment method (3D-CAM) or CAM-ICU, and cognitive screening using the Mini-Mental State Examination at baseline and discharge and the Abbreviated Mental Test score (AMTS) at 30 days and 1 yr. Patients were assigned to light or deep anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the presence of postoperative delirium on any of the first 5 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 1 yr, cognitive decline at discharge, cognitive impairment at 30 days and 1 yr, unplanned ICU admission, length of stay, and time in electroencephalographic burst suppression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The incidence of postoperative delirium in the BIS 50 group was 19% and in the BIS 35 group was 28% (odds ratio 0.58 [95% confidence interval: 0.38–0.88]; <em>P</em>=0.010). At 1 yr, those in the BIS 50 group demonstrated significantly better cognitive function than those in the BIS 35 group (9% with AMTS ≤6 <em>vs</em> 20%; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among patients undergoing major surgery, targeting light anaesthesia reduced the risk of postoperative delirium and cognitive impairment at 1 yr.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><p><span>ACTRN12612000632897</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bja.2021.07.021","citationCount":"113","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091221004931","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 113

Abstract

Background

Postoperative delirium is a serious complication of surgery associated with prolonged hospitalisation, long-term cognitive decline, and mortality. This study aimed to determine whether targeting bispectral index (BIS) readings of 50 (light anaesthesia) was associated with a lower incidence of POD than targeting BIS readings of 35 (deep anaesthesia).

Methods

This multicentre randomised clinical trial of 655 at-risk patients undergoing major surgery from eight centres in three countries assessed delirium for 5 days postoperatively using the 3 min confusion assessment method (3D-CAM) or CAM-ICU, and cognitive screening using the Mini-Mental State Examination at baseline and discharge and the Abbreviated Mental Test score (AMTS) at 30 days and 1 yr. Patients were assigned to light or deep anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the presence of postoperative delirium on any of the first 5 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 1 yr, cognitive decline at discharge, cognitive impairment at 30 days and 1 yr, unplanned ICU admission, length of stay, and time in electroencephalographic burst suppression.

Results

The incidence of postoperative delirium in the BIS 50 group was 19% and in the BIS 35 group was 28% (odds ratio 0.58 [95% confidence interval: 0.38–0.88]; P=0.010). At 1 yr, those in the BIS 50 group demonstrated significantly better cognitive function than those in the BIS 35 group (9% with AMTS ≤6 vs 20%; P<0.001).

Conclusions

Among patients undergoing major surgery, targeting light anaesthesia reduced the risk of postoperative delirium and cognitive impairment at 1 yr.

Clinical trial registration

ACTRN12612000632897.

麻醉深度与大手术后谵妄:一项随机临床试验
背景术后谵妄是手术的严重并发症,与长期住院、长期认知能力下降和死亡率相关。本研究旨在确定双谱指数(BIS)读数为50(轻度麻醉)是否与BIS读数为35(深度麻醉)相比,POD发生率较低。该多中心随机临床试验纳入了来自3个国家8个中心的655名接受大手术的高危患者,使用3分钟神志不清评估法(3D-CAM)或CAM-ICU评估术后5天的谵妄,并在基线和出院时使用简易精神状态检查和30天和1年的简易精神测试评分(AMTS)进行认知筛查。患者被分配轻度或深度麻醉。主要观察指标为术后5天内是否出现谵妄。次要结局包括1年时的死亡率、出院时的认知能力下降、30天和1年时的认知功能障碍、计划外的ICU入院、住院时间和脑电图爆发抑制时间。结果BIS 50组术后谵妄发生率为19%,BIS 35组术后谵妄发生率为28%(优势比0.58[95%可信区间:0.38-0.88];P = 0.010)。1年后,BIS 50组患者的认知功能明显优于BIS 35组(AMTS≤6的9% vs 20%;术中,0.001)。结论在接受大手术的患者中,靶向轻麻醉可降低术后1年谵妄和认知功能障碍的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信