Device nurse intervention facilitates the patients' adaptation to cardiac shock devices in the remote monitoring era.

IF 1.3
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-09 DOI:10.1111/pace.14348
Tomomi Ogawa, Nao Saito, Koji Fukuzawa, Kunihiko Kiuchi, Mitsuru Takami, Megumi Hayashi, Ryo Tanioka, Masaya Ota, Keizo Komoriya, Ikuko Miyawaki, Ken-Ichi Hirata
{"title":"Device nurse intervention facilitates the patients' adaptation to cardiac shock devices in the remote monitoring era.","authors":"Tomomi Ogawa,&nbsp;Nao Saito,&nbsp;Koji Fukuzawa,&nbsp;Kunihiko Kiuchi,&nbsp;Mitsuru Takami,&nbsp;Megumi Hayashi,&nbsp;Ryo Tanioka,&nbsp;Masaya Ota,&nbsp;Keizo Komoriya,&nbsp;Ikuko Miyawaki,&nbsp;Ken-Ichi Hirata","doi":"10.1111/pace.14348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A substantial number of patients with shock devices (implantable cardioverter defibrillators [ICDs] or ICDs with resynchronization [CRTDs]) experience psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the device nurse telephone intervention's effect on improving the patient's adaptation to shock devices, quality of life (QOL), and anxiety in the remote monitoring era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patient's adaptation to the device, health-related QOL, and anxiety were investigated by the modified Implanted Devices Adjustment-Japan score (IDAS), Short Form-36, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before and 1-year after the device nurse telephone intervention, performed every 3 months. A total of 95 patients (median age 69 years and 25 females) participated. Sixty patients had ICDs and 35 CRTDs. Structural heart disease was observed in 72 patients, and idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias in the others. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 46% ± 15%. The median duration since the device implantation was 5.2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total IDAS score significantly improved from 28.42 ± 7.11 at baseline to 26.77 ± 7.68 (p = 0.0076) at 1 year. Both the state and trait anxiety significantly improved (from 38.9 ± 9.6 to 35.3 ± 9.0 [<0.0001] and 38.8 ± 10.3 to 36.2±9.8 [p = 0.0044], respectively). The prevalence of patients with a state and trait anxiety of more than 40 decreased from 44 (46%) and 38 (40%) patients before the study to 27 (28 %) and 32 (34 %) at 1 year. The SF-36 mental component summary score significantly increased (50.8 ± 8.3 at baseline to 53.1 ± 7.7 at 1 year, p = 0.0031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The device nurse intervention facilitated the patient's adaptation to the shock device, increased the health-related QOL, and reduced the patient's anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1874-1883"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/pace.14348","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A substantial number of patients with shock devices (implantable cardioverter defibrillators [ICDs] or ICDs with resynchronization [CRTDs]) experience psychological distress.

Objective: We investigated the device nurse telephone intervention's effect on improving the patient's adaptation to shock devices, quality of life (QOL), and anxiety in the remote monitoring era.

Methods: The patient's adaptation to the device, health-related QOL, and anxiety were investigated by the modified Implanted Devices Adjustment-Japan score (IDAS), Short Form-36, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before and 1-year after the device nurse telephone intervention, performed every 3 months. A total of 95 patients (median age 69 years and 25 females) participated. Sixty patients had ICDs and 35 CRTDs. Structural heart disease was observed in 72 patients, and idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias in the others. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 46% ± 15%. The median duration since the device implantation was 5.2 years.

Results: The total IDAS score significantly improved from 28.42 ± 7.11 at baseline to 26.77 ± 7.68 (p = 0.0076) at 1 year. Both the state and trait anxiety significantly improved (from 38.9 ± 9.6 to 35.3 ± 9.0 [<0.0001] and 38.8 ± 10.3 to 36.2±9.8 [p = 0.0044], respectively). The prevalence of patients with a state and trait anxiety of more than 40 decreased from 44 (46%) and 38 (40%) patients before the study to 27 (28 %) and 32 (34 %) at 1 year. The SF-36 mental component summary score significantly increased (50.8 ± 8.3 at baseline to 53.1 ± 7.7 at 1 year, p = 0.0031).

Conclusions: The device nurse intervention facilitated the patient's adaptation to the shock device, increased the health-related QOL, and reduced the patient's anxiety.

器械护理干预有助于患者适应远程监护时代的心源性休克器械。
背景:大量使用电击装置(植入式心律转复除颤器[ICDs]或再同步除颤器[crtd])的患者经历心理困扰。目的:探讨远程监护时代器械护士电话干预对提高患者对休克器械的适应、生活质量(QOL)和焦虑的作用。方法:采用改良的植入器械调整-日本评分(IDAS)、短表-36、状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)调查患者对器械的适应情况、健康相关生活质量和焦虑情况,每3个月进行一次器械护士电话干预。共有95例患者(中位年龄69岁,女性25例)参与。60例患者有icd, 35例有crtd。结构性心脏病72例,特发性室性心律失常1例。平均左室射血分数为46%±15%。植入装置后的中位持续时间为5.2年。结果:1年后IDAS总分由基线时的28.42±7.11分显著提高至26.77±7.68分(p = 0.0076)。状态焦虑和特质焦虑均有显著改善(由38.9±9.6降至35.3±9.0)。结论:器械护理干预促进了患者对休克装置的适应,提高了患者与健康相关的生活质量,降低了患者的焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信