Characteristics of ground reaction force and frontal body movement during failed trials of single-leg lateral drop jump-landing task

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Kenji Hirohata PT, M.S. CSCS , Junya Aizawa PT, Ph.D. CSCS , Takehiro Ohmi PT, M.S , Shunsuke Ohji PT, Ph.D , Kazuyoshi Yagishita MD, Ph.D
{"title":"Characteristics of ground reaction force and frontal body movement during failed trials of single-leg lateral drop jump-landing task","authors":"Kenji Hirohata PT, M.S. CSCS ,&nbsp;Junya Aizawa PT, Ph.D. CSCS ,&nbsp;Takehiro Ohmi PT, M.S ,&nbsp;Shunsuke Ohji PT, Ph.D ,&nbsp;Kazuyoshi Yagishita MD, Ph.D","doi":"10.1016/j.asmart.2021.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>/objectives: For biomechanical studies using jump-landing tasks, many researchers set the criteria for judging success or failure of the trial. Failed trials are usually removed from the analysis. However, the kinetics and kinematics during tasks included in failed trials might be important for understanding the mechanisms and risk factors of non-contact sports injuries. However, few studies have attempted to analyze failed trials. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics associated with ground reaction force (GRF) and two-dimensional frontal body movements during a failed trial of single-leg lateral drop jump-landing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ten healthy women and 16 healthy men participated in this study. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated using the total number of failed trials and GRF data of successful trials. The association between frontal body movement and kinetics data was identified using correlation analyses. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to compare the GRF data of successful trials and failed trials of the same subject. Additionally, a two-way repeated measure analysis of variance was used to determine significant interactions of each trial and time after initial contact in the frontal body movement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 137 trials including successful and failed trials were recorded. There were 59 failed jump trials. There was a significant negative correlation between the number of failed jump trials and the elapsed time from initial contact to peak vertical GRF (peak vGRF time) during successful trials (r = −0.427). The majority of failed trials were judged to be due to rearfoot movement patterns (rearfoot medial slip or rearfoot lateral slip). During rearfoot medial slip, we observed shorter peak vGRF time, larger trunk medial motions, and larger hip adduction movements after landing than that during successful trials. During rearfoot lateral slip, we observed larger trunk lateral motions and hip abduction movements after landing than that during successful trials.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Athletes who frequently failed during single-leg lateral drop jump-landing had poor skills absorbing jump-landing impact, which is related to various sports injuries. It is possible to identify the risk factors for sports injuries by analyzing failure patterns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44283,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.asmart.2021.07.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687321000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

/objectives: For biomechanical studies using jump-landing tasks, many researchers set the criteria for judging success or failure of the trial. Failed trials are usually removed from the analysis. However, the kinetics and kinematics during tasks included in failed trials might be important for understanding the mechanisms and risk factors of non-contact sports injuries. However, few studies have attempted to analyze failed trials. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics associated with ground reaction force (GRF) and two-dimensional frontal body movements during a failed trial of single-leg lateral drop jump-landing.

Methods

Ten healthy women and 16 healthy men participated in this study. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated using the total number of failed trials and GRF data of successful trials. The association between frontal body movement and kinetics data was identified using correlation analyses. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to compare the GRF data of successful trials and failed trials of the same subject. Additionally, a two-way repeated measure analysis of variance was used to determine significant interactions of each trial and time after initial contact in the frontal body movement.

Results

A total of 137 trials including successful and failed trials were recorded. There were 59 failed jump trials. There was a significant negative correlation between the number of failed jump trials and the elapsed time from initial contact to peak vertical GRF (peak vGRF time) during successful trials (r = −0.427). The majority of failed trials were judged to be due to rearfoot movement patterns (rearfoot medial slip or rearfoot lateral slip). During rearfoot medial slip, we observed shorter peak vGRF time, larger trunk medial motions, and larger hip adduction movements after landing than that during successful trials. During rearfoot lateral slip, we observed larger trunk lateral motions and hip abduction movements after landing than that during successful trials.

Conclusions

Athletes who frequently failed during single-leg lateral drop jump-landing had poor skills absorbing jump-landing impact, which is related to various sports injuries. It is possible to identify the risk factors for sports injuries by analyzing failure patterns.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

单腿侧落跳降失败试验中地面反作用力和正面体运动特征
背景/目的:对于使用跳跃着陆任务的生物力学研究,许多研究人员设定了判断试验成功或失败的标准。失败的试验通常从分析中删除。然而,在失败的试验中,动力学和运动学对于理解非接触性运动损伤的机制和危险因素可能很重要。然而,很少有研究试图分析失败的试验。因此,本研究的主要目的是研究在失败的单腿侧落跳落地试验中与地面反作用力(GRF)和二维前体运动相关的特征。方法10名健康女性和16名健康男性参与本研究。利用失败试验总数和成功试验的GRF数据计算Spearman等级相关系数。使用相关分析确定了正面体运动和动力学数据之间的关联。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较同一受试者成功试验和失败试验的GRF数据。此外,采用双向重复测量方差分析来确定每次试验和初次接触后前额体运动时间的显著相互作用。结果共记录试验137次,包括成功试验和失败试验。有59次跳伞试验失败。在成功的试验中,失败的跳跃试验次数与从初次接触到垂直GRF峰值(vGRF峰值时间)所经过的时间呈显著负相关(r = - 0.427)。大多数失败的试验被认为是由于后脚的运动模式(后脚内侧滑动或后脚外侧滑动)。在后脚内侧滑动时,我们观察到与成功试验相比,落地后vGRF峰值时间更短,躯干内侧运动更大,髋关节内收运动更大。在后脚侧滑时,我们观察到与成功试验相比,着陆后躯干侧移和髋关节外展运动更大。结论运动员在单腿侧落起降中经常失败,其吸收起降冲击的能力较差,这与各种运动损伤有关。通过分析失败模式,可以识别运动损伤的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology (AP-SMART) is the official peer-reviewed, open access journal of the Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society (APKASS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Society of Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine (JOSKAS). It is published quarterly, in January, April, July and October, by Elsevier. The mission of AP-SMART is to inspire clinicians, practitioners, scientists and engineers to work towards a common goal to improve quality of life in the international community. The Journal publishes original research, reviews, editorials, perspectives, and letters to the Editor. Multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines will be the trend in the coming decades. AP-SMART provides a platform for the exchange of new clinical and scientific information in the most precise and expeditious way to achieve timely dissemination of information and cross-fertilization of ideas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信