Deep vs. Shallow Learning-based Filters of MSMS Spectra in Support of Protein Search Engines.

Majdi Maabreh, Basheer Qolomany, James Springstead, Izzat Alsmadi, Ajay Gupta
{"title":"Deep vs. Shallow Learning-based Filters of MSMS Spectra in Support of Protein Search Engines.","authors":"Majdi Maabreh, Basheer Qolomany, James Springstead, Izzat Alsmadi, Ajay Gupta","doi":"10.1109/BIBM.2017.8217824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the linear relation between the number of observed spectra and the searching time, the current protein search engines, even the parallel versions, could take several hours to search a large amount of MSMS spectra, which can be generated in a short time. After a laborious searching process, some (and at times, majority) of the observed spectra are labeled as non-identifiable. We evaluate the role of machine learning in building an efficient MSMS filter to remove non-identifiable spectra. We compare and evaluate the deep learning algorithm using 9 shallow learning algorithms with different configurations. Using 10 different datasets generated from two different search engines, different instruments, different sizes and from different species, we experimentally show that deep learning models are powerful in filtering MSMS spectra. We also show that our simple features list is significant where other shallow learning algorithms showed encouraging results in filtering the MSMS spectra. Our deep learning model can exclude around 50% of the non-identifiable spectra while losing, on average, only 9% of the identifiable ones. As for shallow learning, algorithms of: Random Forest, Support Vector Machine and Neural Networks showed encouraging results, eliminating, on average, 70% of the non-identifiable spectra while losing around 25% of the identifiable ones. The deep learning algorithm may be especially more useful in instances where the protein(s) of interest are in lower cellular or tissue concentration, while the other algorithms may be more useful for concentrated or more highly expressed proteins.</p>","PeriodicalId":74563,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine","volume":"2017 ","pages":"1175-1182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370709/pdf/nihms-1728673.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2017.8217824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the linear relation between the number of observed spectra and the searching time, the current protein search engines, even the parallel versions, could take several hours to search a large amount of MSMS spectra, which can be generated in a short time. After a laborious searching process, some (and at times, majority) of the observed spectra are labeled as non-identifiable. We evaluate the role of machine learning in building an efficient MSMS filter to remove non-identifiable spectra. We compare and evaluate the deep learning algorithm using 9 shallow learning algorithms with different configurations. Using 10 different datasets generated from two different search engines, different instruments, different sizes and from different species, we experimentally show that deep learning models are powerful in filtering MSMS spectra. We also show that our simple features list is significant where other shallow learning algorithms showed encouraging results in filtering the MSMS spectra. Our deep learning model can exclude around 50% of the non-identifiable spectra while losing, on average, only 9% of the identifiable ones. As for shallow learning, algorithms of: Random Forest, Support Vector Machine and Neural Networks showed encouraging results, eliminating, on average, 70% of the non-identifiable spectra while losing around 25% of the identifiable ones. The deep learning algorithm may be especially more useful in instances where the protein(s) of interest are in lower cellular or tissue concentration, while the other algorithms may be more useful for concentrated or more highly expressed proteins.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于深度学习与浅层学习的 MSMS 光谱过滤器,支持蛋白质搜索引擎。
尽管观测到的光谱数量与搜索时间呈线性关系,但目前的蛋白质搜索引擎,即使是并行版本,也需要数小时才能搜索到大量 MSMS 光谱,而这些光谱可以在短时间内生成。在费力的搜索过程之后,部分(有时是大部分)观察到的光谱会被标记为不可识别。我们评估了机器学习在构建高效 MSMS 过滤器以去除不可识别光谱中的作用。我们使用 9 种不同配置的浅层学习算法对深度学习算法进行了比较和评估。通过使用从两个不同搜索引擎、不同仪器、不同大小和不同物种生成的 10 个不同数据集,我们通过实验证明了深度学习模型在过滤 MSMS 图谱方面的强大功能。我们还表明,在其他浅层学习算法显示出令人鼓舞的 MSMS 图谱过滤结果的情况下,我们的简单特征列表具有重要意义。我们的深度学习模型可以排除约 50% 的不可识别光谱,而平均只损失 9% 的可识别光谱。在浅层学习方面,我们采用了以下算法随机森林算法、支持向量机算法和神经网络算法都取得了令人鼓舞的结果,平均排除了 70% 的不可识别光谱,同时损失了约 25% 的可识别光谱。深度学习算法在相关蛋白质的细胞或组织浓度较低的情况下可能尤其有用,而其他算法可能对浓度较高或表达较高的蛋白质更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信