Conceptualization of Hand-TaPS to measure the subjective experience of dynamic hand orthoses in promoting functional recovery at home after stroke.

IF 0.7 Q4 REHABILITATION
Manon M Schladen, Yiannis Koumpouros, Melissa Sandison, Rafael Casas, Peter Lum
{"title":"Conceptualization of Hand-TaPS to measure the subjective experience of dynamic hand orthoses in promoting functional recovery at home after stroke.","authors":"Manon M Schladen,&nbsp;Yiannis Koumpouros,&nbsp;Melissa Sandison,&nbsp;Rafael Casas,&nbsp;Peter Lum","doi":"10.3233/tad-200289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dynamic exoskeleton orthoses provide assistance needed to complete movements that would otherwise be impossible after stroke. Beyond the demonstration of their effectiveness, the subjective experience of dynamic orthoses also needs to be considered.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To support functional recovery after stroke through the development of Hand-TaPS (Task Practice after Stroke), an instrument to evaluate dynamic hand orthoses in home therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dynamic hand orthosis subject matter experts (<i>N</i> = 14), professionals and consumers, considered the items of PYTHEIA, a valid and reliable instrument merging well-tested, assistive technology (AT) assessment items with those tuned to the greater complexity of emerging technologies. Experts reflected on how each item aligned with their personal experience of dynamic orthosis use. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis guided identification of themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes (5/20 items) appraised highly relevant for Hand-TaPS. The remaining eight themes (15/20 items) were deemed in need of modification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dynamic hand orthoses constitute a <i>special case</i> of AT; the assistance they provide targets therapy, not ADLs. Our work to develop Hand-TaPS provides a clear example of the theoretical difference between rehabilitative and assistive technology and underscores the importance of consideration of how a device is used in its assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22201,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Disability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/tad-200289","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Disability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-200289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Dynamic exoskeleton orthoses provide assistance needed to complete movements that would otherwise be impossible after stroke. Beyond the demonstration of their effectiveness, the subjective experience of dynamic orthoses also needs to be considered.

Objective: To support functional recovery after stroke through the development of Hand-TaPS (Task Practice after Stroke), an instrument to evaluate dynamic hand orthoses in home therapy.

Methods: Dynamic hand orthosis subject matter experts (N = 14), professionals and consumers, considered the items of PYTHEIA, a valid and reliable instrument merging well-tested, assistive technology (AT) assessment items with those tuned to the greater complexity of emerging technologies. Experts reflected on how each item aligned with their personal experience of dynamic orthosis use. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis guided identification of themes.

Results: Four themes (5/20 items) appraised highly relevant for Hand-TaPS. The remaining eight themes (15/20 items) were deemed in need of modification.

Conclusions: Dynamic hand orthoses constitute a special case of AT; the assistance they provide targets therapy, not ADLs. Our work to develop Hand-TaPS provides a clear example of the theoretical difference between rehabilitative and assistive technology and underscores the importance of consideration of how a device is used in its assessment.

概念化手拍测量动态手部矫形器在促进脑卒中后家庭功能恢复中的主观体验。
背景:动态外骨骼矫形器提供了完成中风后不可能完成的运动所需的辅助。除了证明其有效性之外,还需要考虑动态矫形器的主观体验。目的:通过开发一种评估动态手部矫形器在家庭治疗中的应用效果的仪器- hand - taps(卒中后任务练习)来支持脑卒中后的功能恢复。方法:动态手部矫形器主题专家(N = 14),专业人员和消费者考虑PYTHEIA的项目,PYTHEIA是一种有效可靠的仪器,将经过良好测试的辅助技术(AT)评估项目与更复杂的新兴技术相结合。专家们反映了每个项目如何与他们使用动态矫形器的个人经验相一致。解释性现象学分析指导主题的识别。结果:4个主题(5/20项)与Hand-TaPS高度相关。其余8个主题(15/20个项目)认为需要修改。结论:动态手部矫形器是一种特殊的AT病例;他们提供的帮助是针对治疗,而不是ADLs。我们开发Hand-TaPS的工作为康复和辅助技术之间的理论差异提供了一个清晰的例子,并强调了在评估中考虑如何使用设备的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technology and Disability
Technology and Disability Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Technology and Disability communicates knowledge about the field of assistive technology devices and services, within the context of the lives of end users - persons with disabilities and their family members. While the topics are technical in nature, the articles are written for broad comprehension despite the reader"s education or training. Technology and Disability"s contents cover research and development efforts, education and training programs, service and policy activities and consumer experiences. - The term Technology refers to assistive devices and services. - The term Disability refers to both permanent and temporary functional limitations experienced by people of any age within any circumstance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信