Effectiveness of a Faith-placed Cardiovascular Health Promotion Intervention for Rural Adults.

Kristine Zimmermann, Leslie R Carnahan, Manorama M Khare, Apurba Chakraborty, Heather Risser, Yamilé Molina, Stacie E Geller
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Faith-placed Cardiovascular Health Promotion Intervention for Rural Adults.","authors":"Kristine Zimmermann,&nbsp;Leslie R Carnahan,&nbsp;Manorama M Khare,&nbsp;Apurba Chakraborty,&nbsp;Heather Risser,&nbsp;Yamilé Molina,&nbsp;Stacie E Geller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in the US. Further, rural US adults experience disproportionately high CVD prevalence and mortality compared to non-rural. Cardiovascular risk-reduction interventions for rural adults have shown short-term effectiveness, but long-term maintenance of outcomes remains a challenge. Faith organizations offer promise as collaborative partners for translating evidence-based interventions to reduce CVD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adapted and implemented a collaborative, faith-placed, CVD risk-reduction intervention in rural Illinois. We used a quasi-experimental, pre-post design to compare changes in dietary and physical activity among participants. Intervention components included Heart Smart for Women (HSFW), an evidence-based program implemented weekly for 12 weeks followed by Heart Smart Maintenance (HSM), implemented monthly for two years. Participants engaged in HSFW only, HSM only, or both. We used regression and generalized estimating equations models to examine changes in outcomes after one year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants who completed both baseline and one-year surveys (n = 131), HSFW+HSM participants had significantly higher vegetable consumption (<i>p</i> = .007) and combined fruit/vegetable consumption (<i>p</i> = .01) compared to the HSM-only group at one year. We found no differences in physical activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improving and maintaining CVD-risk behaviors is a persistent challenge in rural populations. Advancing research to improve our understanding of effective translation of CVD risk-reduction interventions in rural populations is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":15847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health disparities research and practice","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375394/pdf/nihms-1562078.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health disparities research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in the US. Further, rural US adults experience disproportionately high CVD prevalence and mortality compared to non-rural. Cardiovascular risk-reduction interventions for rural adults have shown short-term effectiveness, but long-term maintenance of outcomes remains a challenge. Faith organizations offer promise as collaborative partners for translating evidence-based interventions to reduce CVD.

Methods: We adapted and implemented a collaborative, faith-placed, CVD risk-reduction intervention in rural Illinois. We used a quasi-experimental, pre-post design to compare changes in dietary and physical activity among participants. Intervention components included Heart Smart for Women (HSFW), an evidence-based program implemented weekly for 12 weeks followed by Heart Smart Maintenance (HSM), implemented monthly for two years. Participants engaged in HSFW only, HSM only, or both. We used regression and generalized estimating equations models to examine changes in outcomes after one year.

Results: Among participants who completed both baseline and one-year surveys (n = 131), HSFW+HSM participants had significantly higher vegetable consumption (p = .007) and combined fruit/vegetable consumption (p = .01) compared to the HSM-only group at one year. We found no differences in physical activity.

Conclusion: Improving and maintaining CVD-risk behaviors is a persistent challenge in rural populations. Advancing research to improve our understanding of effective translation of CVD risk-reduction interventions in rural populations is critical.

Abstract Image

农村成年人心血管健康促进干预的有效性
简介:心血管疾病(CVD)是美国死亡的主要原因。此外,与非农村地区相比,美国农村成年人的心血管疾病患病率和死亡率不成比例地高。针对农村成年人的心血管风险降低干预措施已显示出短期效果,但结果的长期维持仍然是一个挑战。信仰组织承诺作为合作伙伴,将基于证据的干预措施转化为减少心血管疾病。方法:我们在伊利诺斯州农村调整并实施了一项协作、信任、降低心血管疾病风险的干预措施。我们采用准实验、前后设计来比较参与者饮食和身体活动的变化。干预措施包括妇女心脏智能(HSFW),这是一个基于证据的项目,每周实施12周,然后是心脏智能维护(HSM),每月实施两年。参与者只从事HSFW、HSM或两者兼而有之。我们使用回归和广义估计方程模型来检查一年后结果的变化。结果:在完成基线和一年调查的参与者中(n = 131), HSFW+HSM参与者在一年的蔬菜消费量(p = .007)和水果/蔬菜综合消费量(p = .01)显著高于仅hssm组。我们发现在体力活动方面没有差异。结论:改善和维持农村人群的心血管疾病高危行为是一项持续的挑战。推进研究以提高我们对农村人群心血管疾病风险降低干预措施有效转化的理解至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信