Clinicians' Probability Calculator to Convert Pre-Test to Post-Test Probability of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Based on Method Validation from Each Laboratory.

EJIFCC Pub Date : 2021-06-29 eCollection Date: 2021-06-01
Zoe Brooks, Saswati Das, Tom Pliura
{"title":"Clinicians' Probability Calculator to Convert Pre-Test to Post-Test Probability of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Based on Method Validation from Each Laboratory.","authors":"Zoe Brooks,&nbsp;Saswati Das,&nbsp;Tom Pliura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite best efforts, false positive and false negative test results for SARS-CoV-2 are unavoidable. Likelihood ratios convert a clinical opinion of pre-test probability to post-test probability, independently of prevalence of disease in the test population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors examined results of PPA (Positive Percent Agreement, sensitivity) and NPA (Negative Percent Agreement, specificity) from 73 laboratory experiments for molecular tests for SARS-CoV-2 as reported to the FIND database, and for two manufacturers' claims in FDA EUA submissions.PPA and NPA were converted to likelihood ratios to calculate post-test probability of disease based on clinical opinion of pre-test probability. Confidence intervals were based on the number of samples tested. An online calculator was created to help clinicians identify false-positive, or false-negative SARS-CoV-2 test results for COVID-19 disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Laboratory results from the same test methods did not mirror each other or the manufacturer. Laboratory studies showed PPA from 17% to 100% and NPA from 70.4% to 100%. The number of known samples varied 8 to 675 known patient samples, which greatly impacted confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-test probability of the presence of disease (true-positive or false-negative tests) varies with clinical pre-test probability, likelihood ratios and confidence intervals.The Clinician's Probability Calculator creates reports to help clinicians estimate post-test probability of COVID-19 based on the testing laboratory's verified PPA and NPA.</p>","PeriodicalId":193105,"journal":{"name":"EJIFCC","volume":"32 2","pages":"265-279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/66/dc/ejifcc-32-265.PMC8343041.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJIFCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite best efforts, false positive and false negative test results for SARS-CoV-2 are unavoidable. Likelihood ratios convert a clinical opinion of pre-test probability to post-test probability, independently of prevalence of disease in the test population.

Methods: The authors examined results of PPA (Positive Percent Agreement, sensitivity) and NPA (Negative Percent Agreement, specificity) from 73 laboratory experiments for molecular tests for SARS-CoV-2 as reported to the FIND database, and for two manufacturers' claims in FDA EUA submissions.PPA and NPA were converted to likelihood ratios to calculate post-test probability of disease based on clinical opinion of pre-test probability. Confidence intervals were based on the number of samples tested. An online calculator was created to help clinicians identify false-positive, or false-negative SARS-CoV-2 test results for COVID-19 disease.

Results: Laboratory results from the same test methods did not mirror each other or the manufacturer. Laboratory studies showed PPA from 17% to 100% and NPA from 70.4% to 100%. The number of known samples varied 8 to 675 known patient samples, which greatly impacted confidence intervals.

Conclusion: Post-test probability of the presence of disease (true-positive or false-negative tests) varies with clinical pre-test probability, likelihood ratios and confidence intervals.The Clinician's Probability Calculator creates reports to help clinicians estimate post-test probability of COVID-19 based on the testing laboratory's verified PPA and NPA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于各实验室方法验证的临床医生将SARS-CoV-2感染检测前概率转换为检测后概率的概率计算器
背景:尽管尽了最大努力,但新冠病毒检测结果的假阳性和假阴性是不可避免的。似然比将测试前概率的临床观点转换为测试后概率,与测试人群中疾病的患病率无关。方法:作者检查了报告给FIND数据库的73个实验室实验中SARS-CoV-2分子检测的PPA(阳性百分比一致性,敏感性)和NPA(阴性百分比一致性,特异性)的结果,以及两家制造商在FDA EUA提交的声明。将PPA和NPA转换为似然比,根据临床对验前概率的判断计算疾病的验后概率。置信区间基于测试样本的数量。创建了一个在线计算器,以帮助临床医生识别COVID-19疾病的SARS-CoV-2检测结果的假阳性或假阴性。结果:相同检测方法的实验室结果不反映彼此或制造商。实验室研究表明,PPA从17%到100%,NPA从70.4%到100%。已知样本数量从8到675个已知患者样本不等,这极大地影响了置信区间。结论:检测后疾病存在的概率(真阳性或假阴性)随临床检测前概率、似然比和置信区间而变化。临床医生概率计算器根据检测实验室验证的PPA和NPA创建报告,帮助临床医生估计COVID-19检测后的概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信