Helical plating - a novel technique to increase stiffness in defect fractures.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
M Lenz, P Varga, D Mischler, B Gueorguiev, K Klos, A Fernandez dell'Oca, P Regazzoni, R G Richards, S M Perren
{"title":"Helical plating - a novel technique to increase stiffness in defect fractures.","authors":"M Lenz,&nbsp;P Varga,&nbsp;D Mischler,&nbsp;B Gueorguiev,&nbsp;K Klos,&nbsp;A Fernandez dell'Oca,&nbsp;P Regazzoni,&nbsp;R G Richards,&nbsp;S M Perren","doi":"10.22203/eCM.v042a08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-plate fixation bridging bone defects provokes nonunion and risks plate-fatigue failure due to under- dimensioned implants. Adding a helical plate to bridge the fracture increases stiffness and balances load sharing. This study compares the stiffness and plate surface strain of different constructs in a transverse contact and gap femoral shaft fracture model. Eight groups of six synthetic femora each were formed: intact femora; intact femora with lateral locking plate; contact and gap transverse shaft osteotomies each with lateral locking plate, lateral locking plate and helical locking plate, and long proximal femoral nail. Constructs underwent non-destructive quasi-static axial and torsional loading. Plate surface strain evaluation was performed under 200 N axial loading. Constructs with both lateral and helical plates demonstrated similar axial and torsional stiffness- independent of the contact or gap situations - being significantly higher compared to lateral plating (p < 0.01). Torsional stiffness of the constructs, with both lateral and helical plates in the gap situation, was significantly higher compared to this situation stabilised by a nail (p < 0.01). Plate surface strain dropped from 0.3 % in the gap situation with a lateral plate to < 0.1 % in this situation with both a lateral and a helical plate. Additional helical plating increases axial and torsional construct stiffness in synthetic bone and seems to provide well-balanced load sharing. Its use should be considered in very demanding situations for gap or defect fractures, where single-plate osteosynthesis provides inadequate stiffness for fracture healing and induces nonunion.</p>","PeriodicalId":11849,"journal":{"name":"European cells & materials","volume":"42 ","pages":"110-121"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European cells & materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v042a08","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single-plate fixation bridging bone defects provokes nonunion and risks plate-fatigue failure due to under- dimensioned implants. Adding a helical plate to bridge the fracture increases stiffness and balances load sharing. This study compares the stiffness and plate surface strain of different constructs in a transverse contact and gap femoral shaft fracture model. Eight groups of six synthetic femora each were formed: intact femora; intact femora with lateral locking plate; contact and gap transverse shaft osteotomies each with lateral locking plate, lateral locking plate and helical locking plate, and long proximal femoral nail. Constructs underwent non-destructive quasi-static axial and torsional loading. Plate surface strain evaluation was performed under 200 N axial loading. Constructs with both lateral and helical plates demonstrated similar axial and torsional stiffness- independent of the contact or gap situations - being significantly higher compared to lateral plating (p < 0.01). Torsional stiffness of the constructs, with both lateral and helical plates in the gap situation, was significantly higher compared to this situation stabilised by a nail (p < 0.01). Plate surface strain dropped from 0.3 % in the gap situation with a lateral plate to < 0.1 % in this situation with both a lateral and a helical plate. Additional helical plating increases axial and torsional construct stiffness in synthetic bone and seems to provide well-balanced load sharing. Its use should be considered in very demanding situations for gap or defect fractures, where single-plate osteosynthesis provides inadequate stiffness for fracture healing and induces nonunion.

螺旋镀-一种增加缺陷骨折刚度的新技术。
单钢板固定桥接骨缺损会引起骨不愈合,并且由于植入物尺寸过低而有钢板疲劳失效的风险。添加一个螺旋板来桥接断裂,增加了刚度,平衡了负载分担。本研究比较了不同结构在股骨干横向接触间隙骨折模型中的刚度和钢板表面应变。合成股骨共8组,每组6根:完整股骨;带外侧锁定钢板的完整股骨;接触间隙横轴截骨术各用外侧锁定钢板、外侧锁定钢板和螺旋锁定钢板,股骨近端长钉。结构体进行非破坏性的准静态轴向和扭转加载。在200 N轴向载荷下,进行了板的表面应变评估。与侧钢板相比,侧钢板和螺旋钢板具有相似的轴向和扭转刚度(与接触或间隙情况无关)(p < 0.01)。侧钢板和螺旋钢板在间隙情况下的扭转刚度明显高于用钉固定的情况(p < 0.01)。板表面应变从带侧板的间隙情况下的0.3%下降到带侧板和螺旋板的间隙情况下的< 0.1%。额外的螺旋钢板增加了合成骨的轴向和扭转结构刚度,似乎提供了平衡的负荷分担。它的使用应考虑在非常苛刻的情况下间隙或缺陷骨折,其中单钢板接骨术提供的刚度不足,骨折愈合和诱导不愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European cells & materials
European cells & materials 生物-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: eCM provides an interdisciplinary forum for publication of preclinical research in the musculoskeletal field (Trauma, Maxillofacial (including dental), Spine and Orthopaedics). The clinical relevance of the work must be briefly mentioned within the abstract, and in more detail in the paper. Poor abstracts which do not concisely cover the paper contents will not be sent for review. Incremental steps in research will not be entertained by eCM journal.Cross-disciplinary papers that go across our scope areas are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信