Evaluation of Central Auditory Processing in Musicians and Non-Musicians.

Q3 Medicine
Senanur Kahraman, Sena Karaduman, Selim Ünsal, Fulya Yalçınkaya
{"title":"Evaluation of Central Auditory Processing in Musicians and Non-Musicians.","authors":"Senanur Kahraman,&nbsp;Sena Karaduman,&nbsp;Selim Ünsal,&nbsp;Fulya Yalçınkaya","doi":"10.5935/0946-5448.20210021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Auditory processing is the analysis of sounds' attributions such as localization, lateralization, temporality, frequency, loudness, phase, auditory memory and auditory attention through primer and secondar central auditory paths. This study aims to show that music contributes on auditory processing by applying central auditory tests on two groups who are musicians and nonmusicians.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The participants in this study are aged between 20 and 40. The mean age of the musician participants is 24.40±3.811, when the mean age of non-musician participants is 26.07±4.525. Each group has 30 participants. All participants got examined for otorhinolaryngology and they were tested for pure tone audiometry and immitansmetric measurement. For musician participants, this study included people who have professional music career for at least 5 years and for non-musician participants, it has been included those who are capable of normal hearing. All participants tested for Frequency Patterns Test (FPT), Duration Patterns Test (DPT), Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) and Staggered Spondaic Word Test (SSWT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the FPT, DPT, RGDT and SSWT tests applied to musician and non-musician participants indicate that there is a statistical significance on auditory processing between these two groups (p<0.05). It is founded that there is a considerable difference as a result of statistical significance between the tests from right to left and from left to right (p<0.05). In addition, it is founded that musician participants have much more comprehension ability in the tests from left to right than the tests from right to lefts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that people who are interested in music professionally have developed auditory processing skills and senses than people who does not show any professional interest in music.</p>","PeriodicalId":39842,"journal":{"name":"International Tinnitus Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"118-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Tinnitus Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0946-5448.20210021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Auditory processing is the analysis of sounds' attributions such as localization, lateralization, temporality, frequency, loudness, phase, auditory memory and auditory attention through primer and secondar central auditory paths. This study aims to show that music contributes on auditory processing by applying central auditory tests on two groups who are musicians and nonmusicians.

Materials and methods: The participants in this study are aged between 20 and 40. The mean age of the musician participants is 24.40±3.811, when the mean age of non-musician participants is 26.07±4.525. Each group has 30 participants. All participants got examined for otorhinolaryngology and they were tested for pure tone audiometry and immitansmetric measurement. For musician participants, this study included people who have professional music career for at least 5 years and for non-musician participants, it has been included those who are capable of normal hearing. All participants tested for Frequency Patterns Test (FPT), Duration Patterns Test (DPT), Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) and Staggered Spondaic Word Test (SSWT).

Results: The results of the FPT, DPT, RGDT and SSWT tests applied to musician and non-musician participants indicate that there is a statistical significance on auditory processing between these two groups (p<0.05). It is founded that there is a considerable difference as a result of statistical significance between the tests from right to left and from left to right (p<0.05). In addition, it is founded that musician participants have much more comprehension ability in the tests from left to right than the tests from right to lefts.

Conclusion: This study indicates that people who are interested in music professionally have developed auditory processing skills and senses than people who does not show any professional interest in music.

音乐家与非音乐家中枢听觉加工的评价。
目的:听觉加工是通过初级和次级中枢听觉通路对声音的定位、偏侧、时间性、频率、响度、相位、听觉记忆和听觉注意等属性进行分析。本研究旨在通过对两组音乐家和非音乐家进行中央听觉测试来表明音乐对听觉处理的贡献。材料与方法:研究对象年龄在20 - 40岁之间。音乐家参与者的平均年龄为24.40±3.811岁,非音乐家参与者的平均年龄为26.07±4.525岁。每组30人。所有参与者都接受了耳鼻喉科检查,并进行了纯音听力测试和免疫测量测试。对于音乐家参与者,这项研究包括了从事专业音乐生涯至少5年的人,对于非音乐家参与者,它包括了听力正常的人。所有参与者都进行了频率模式测试(FPT)、持续模式测试(DPT)、随机间隙检测测试(RGDT)和交错自发性单词测试(SSWT)。结果:音乐家和非音乐家被试的FPT、DPT、RGDT和SSWT测试结果表明,两组之间的听觉加工有统计学意义(p)。结论:本研究表明,对音乐有专业兴趣的人比对音乐没有专业兴趣的人有更发达的听觉加工技能和感官。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Tinnitus Journal
International Tinnitus Journal Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The International Tinnitus Journal is the first peer review journal to provide a forum for exchange of information of on-going basic and clinical science efforts for understanding tinnitus and its application to patient diagnosis and treatment. Subject areas to be covered range from fundamental theory to clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书