Relationship between cognition and the severity of chronic tinnitus: Validation of the Japanese version of the Tinnitus Cognitions Questionnaire.

Q3 Medicine
Kayoko Kabaya, Mariko Takahashi, Yuji Sato, Kenichi Sekiya, Shinobu Ito, Shinichi Iwasaki
{"title":"Relationship between cognition and the severity of chronic tinnitus: Validation of the Japanese version of the Tinnitus Cognitions Questionnaire.","authors":"Kayoko Kabaya,&nbsp;Mariko Takahashi,&nbsp;Yuji Sato,&nbsp;Kenichi Sekiya,&nbsp;Shinobu Ito,&nbsp;Shinichi Iwasaki","doi":"10.5935/0946-5448.20210020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Tinnitus Cognitions Questionnaire (TCQ) is a scale designed to assess the positive and negative cognitions associated with tinnitus. The purpose of this study was to validate the Japanese version of the TCQ and to analyze the relationship between cognition and the severity of chronic tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study. Patients with chronic tinnitus persisting for longer than 3 months were included. Participants completed the TCQ, the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). They also completed the TCQ a second time 3-7 days later. The questionnaire was translated into Japanese. A factor analysis was performed and the convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total sample consisted of 75 participants. We obtained high Cronbach's α coefficients for the total score and subscales, ranging from 0.933 to 0.974. The total score and subscale interclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.631 to 0.963. The factor analysis yielded a two-factor structure: negative and positive subscales. The convergent and discriminative validity was sufficiently clear. The negative subscale of the TCQ was strongly correlated with the THI and the HADS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Japanese version of the TCQ was validated here. It also exhibited a two-factor structure that was well matched with previous data. And it was a highly consistent and reliable measure that can be used to evaluate cognitions in patients with chronic tinnitus. Negative cognition for tinnitus was greatly related to handicap and psychological state.</p>","PeriodicalId":39842,"journal":{"name":"International Tinnitus Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"112-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Tinnitus Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0946-5448.20210020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Tinnitus Cognitions Questionnaire (TCQ) is a scale designed to assess the positive and negative cognitions associated with tinnitus. The purpose of this study was to validate the Japanese version of the TCQ and to analyze the relationship between cognition and the severity of chronic tinnitus.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study. Patients with chronic tinnitus persisting for longer than 3 months were included. Participants completed the TCQ, the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). They also completed the TCQ a second time 3-7 days later. The questionnaire was translated into Japanese. A factor analysis was performed and the convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were evaluated.

Results: The total sample consisted of 75 participants. We obtained high Cronbach's α coefficients for the total score and subscales, ranging from 0.933 to 0.974. The total score and subscale interclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.631 to 0.963. The factor analysis yielded a two-factor structure: negative and positive subscales. The convergent and discriminative validity was sufficiently clear. The negative subscale of the TCQ was strongly correlated with the THI and the HADS.

Conclusion: The Japanese version of the TCQ was validated here. It also exhibited a two-factor structure that was well matched with previous data. And it was a highly consistent and reliable measure that can be used to evaluate cognitions in patients with chronic tinnitus. Negative cognition for tinnitus was greatly related to handicap and psychological state.

认知与慢性耳鸣严重程度的关系:日文版耳鸣认知问卷的验证。
目的:耳鸣认知问卷(TCQ)是一种评估与耳鸣相关的积极认知和消极认知的量表。本研究的目的是验证日本版的TCQ,并分析认知与慢性耳鸣严重程度之间的关系。方法:这是一项横断面、多中心研究。包括慢性耳鸣持续时间超过3个月的患者。参与者完成了TCQ、耳鸣障碍量表(THI)和医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)。他们也在3-7天后完成了第二次TCQ。问卷被翻译成日文。进行因子分析,评估收敛效度和判别效度、内部一致性和重测信度。结果:样本共75人。我们获得了总分和分量表的高Cronbach's α系数,范围从0.933到0.974。重测信度的总分和子量表类间相关系数为0.631 ~ 0.963。因子分析结果显示出两因子结构:负分量表和正分量表。收敛效度和判别效度足够明确。TCQ负分量表与THI和HADS呈显著正相关。结论:日文TCQ的有效性得到了验证。它还表现出与先前数据很好匹配的双因素结构。这是一种高度一致和可靠的测量方法,可用于评估慢性耳鸣患者的认知。耳鸣的负性认知与残疾、心理状态有很大关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Tinnitus Journal
International Tinnitus Journal Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The International Tinnitus Journal is the first peer review journal to provide a forum for exchange of information of on-going basic and clinical science efforts for understanding tinnitus and its application to patient diagnosis and treatment. Subject areas to be covered range from fundamental theory to clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书