Distribution of bacteria infected by metagenomic sequencing technology in maxillofacial space.

Q3 Medicine
Yi-Heng Chen, Hong-Yu Zheng, Zi-Xuan Li, Yong-Chao Wu, Zhi-Xing Niu, Yan-Hui Peng, Jun-Fang Zhao, Qiang Sun
{"title":"Distribution of bacteria infected by metagenomic sequencing technology in maxillofacial space.","authors":"Yi-Heng Chen,&nbsp;Hong-Yu Zheng,&nbsp;Zi-Xuan Li,&nbsp;Yong-Chao Wu,&nbsp;Zhi-Xing Niu,&nbsp;Yan-Hui Peng,&nbsp;Jun-Fang Zhao,&nbsp;Qiang Sun","doi":"10.7518/hxkq.2021.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare and analyze the consistency and difference between metageno-mic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and conventional bacterial culture in the detection of pathogenic microorganisms in maxillofacial space infection, as well as to provide a new detection method for the early clinical identification of pathogenic bacteria in maxillofacial space infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 16 patients with oral and maxillofacial space infections in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from March 2020 to June 2020 were collected. mNGS and conventional bacterial culture methods were used to detect pus. We then analyzed and compared the test results of the two methods, including the test cycle, positive detection rate, anaerobic bacteria, facultative anaerobes and aerobic bacteria detection rates, distribution of pathogenic bacteria, relative species abundance, and resistance genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average inspection period of mNGS was (18.81±3.73) h, and the average inspection period of bacterial culture was (83.25±11.64) h, the former was shorter than the latter (<i>P</i><0.05). The positive detection rate of mNGS was 100% (16/16), and the positive detection rate of conventional bacterial culture was 31.25% (5/16), the former was higher than the latter (<i>P</i><0.05). The detection rate of mNGS anaerobic bacteria was 93.75% (15/16), the detection rate of bacterial culture anaerobes was 0 (0/16), the former was higher than the latter (<i>P</i><0.05). Using mNGS, the detection rate of facultative anaerobes in bacterial culture was 75.00% (12/16), and the detection rate of facultative anaerobes in bacterial culture was 25.00% (4/16), the former was higher than the latter (<i>P</i><0.05). The detection rate of aerobic bacteria in bacterial culture was 12.50% (1/16), the former was higher than the latter (<i>P</i>>0.05). mNGS detected 15 kinds of pathogenic bacteria, among which 3 were Gram positive, 12 were Gram negative, 49 were non-pathogenic, 16 were Gram positive, and 32 were Gram negative, 1 was fungus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with conventional bacterial culture, mNGS has the characteristics of short test time, high sensitivity, and high accuracy. Thus, it is a new detection method for the early identification of pathogenic bacteria in maxillofacial space infection and is beneficial to the early clinical diagnosis and treatment of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":35800,"journal":{"name":"华西口腔医学杂志","volume":"39 4","pages":"475-481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381121/pdf/wcjs-39-04-475.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"华西口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2021.04.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare and analyze the consistency and difference between metageno-mic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and conventional bacterial culture in the detection of pathogenic microorganisms in maxillofacial space infection, as well as to provide a new detection method for the early clinical identification of pathogenic bacteria in maxillofacial space infection.

Methods: The clinical data of 16 patients with oral and maxillofacial space infections in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from March 2020 to June 2020 were collected. mNGS and conventional bacterial culture methods were used to detect pus. We then analyzed and compared the test results of the two methods, including the test cycle, positive detection rate, anaerobic bacteria, facultative anaerobes and aerobic bacteria detection rates, distribution of pathogenic bacteria, relative species abundance, and resistance genes.

Results: The average inspection period of mNGS was (18.81±3.73) h, and the average inspection period of bacterial culture was (83.25±11.64) h, the former was shorter than the latter (P<0.05). The positive detection rate of mNGS was 100% (16/16), and the positive detection rate of conventional bacterial culture was 31.25% (5/16), the former was higher than the latter (P<0.05). The detection rate of mNGS anaerobic bacteria was 93.75% (15/16), the detection rate of bacterial culture anaerobes was 0 (0/16), the former was higher than the latter (P<0.05). Using mNGS, the detection rate of facultative anaerobes in bacterial culture was 75.00% (12/16), and the detection rate of facultative anaerobes in bacterial culture was 25.00% (4/16), the former was higher than the latter (P<0.05). The detection rate of aerobic bacteria in bacterial culture was 12.50% (1/16), the former was higher than the latter (P>0.05). mNGS detected 15 kinds of pathogenic bacteria, among which 3 were Gram positive, 12 were Gram negative, 49 were non-pathogenic, 16 were Gram positive, and 32 were Gram negative, 1 was fungus.

Conclusions: Compared with conventional bacterial culture, mNGS has the characteristics of short test time, high sensitivity, and high accuracy. Thus, it is a new detection method for the early identification of pathogenic bacteria in maxillofacial space infection and is beneficial to the early clinical diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

应用宏基因组测序技术检测颌面部间隙感染细菌的分布。
目的:本研究旨在比较分析宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)与常规细菌培养在检测颌面间隙感染病原微生物方面的一致性和差异性,为临床早期识别颌面间隙感染致病菌提供一种新的检测方法。方法:收集郑州大学第一附属医院2020年3月至2020年6月收治的16例口腔颌面间隙感染患者的临床资料。使用mNGS和常规细菌培养方法检测脓液。然后,我们对两种方法的检测结果进行了分析和比较,包括检测周期、阳性检出率、厌氧菌、兼性厌氧菌和好氧菌的检出率、病原菌分布、相对物种丰度和抗性基因。结果:mNGS平均检测周期为(18.81±3.73)h,细菌培养平均检测周期(83.25±11.64)h,前者短于后者(PPPPP>0.05)。结论:与传统细菌培养相比,mNGS具有检测时间短、灵敏度高、准确度高等特点。因此,它是一种早期识别颌面部间隙感染病原菌的新检测方法,有利于该疾病的早期临床诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
华西口腔医学杂志
华西口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6397
期刊介绍: West China Journal of Stomatology (WCJS, pISSN 1000-1182, eISSN 2618-0456, CN 51-1169/R), published bimonthly, is a peer-reviewed Open Access journal, hosted by Sichuan university and Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. WCJS was established in 1983 and indexed in Medline/Pubmed, SCOPUS, EBSCO, Chemical Abstract(CA), CNKI, WANFANG Data, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信