Neo-Traditional Medicines: Ethnographic Contributions to Conceptual Definition.

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Canadian Bulletin of Medical History Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-17 DOI:10.3138/cbmh.473-102020
Pedro Carlessi, José Ricardo Ayres
{"title":"Neo-Traditional Medicines: Ethnographic Contributions to Conceptual Definition.","authors":"Pedro Carlessi,&nbsp;José Ricardo Ayres","doi":"10.3138/cbmh.473-102020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the end of 1970, the World Health Organization has encouraged the development of public policies that expand the approach to care and the therapeutic possibilities offered by its member states beyond technoscientific health care. In Brazil, the institutionalization of this approach is related to the promotion of popular and traditional knowledge associated with the usage of medicinal plants. With this convergence as an argumentative horizon, in this ethnography we examine the institutionalization of pharmaceutical services that have become known in Brazilian public health policy as <i>living pharmacies</i>. This term has been mobilized throughout the history of phytotherapy in Brazil and refers to the possibility of instituting the use of medications that expand care approaches and problem resolution possibilities beyond the domain of the biomedical sciences, evoking alliances with so-called traditional and popular knowledge and practices. For this, we propose and discuss the concept of <i>neo-traditional medicines</i> as a comprehensive-interpretative category, verifying the approximation and distancing points assigned to it in contemporaneous anthropological literature. Beyond the domain of science over other fields of knowledge, we argue in favour of this category in order to present new arrangements and social dynamics that define Brazil's medication policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55634,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Bulletin of Medical History","volume":"38 S1","pages":"S6-S30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Bulletin of Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cbmh.473-102020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the end of 1970, the World Health Organization has encouraged the development of public policies that expand the approach to care and the therapeutic possibilities offered by its member states beyond technoscientific health care. In Brazil, the institutionalization of this approach is related to the promotion of popular and traditional knowledge associated with the usage of medicinal plants. With this convergence as an argumentative horizon, in this ethnography we examine the institutionalization of pharmaceutical services that have become known in Brazilian public health policy as living pharmacies. This term has been mobilized throughout the history of phytotherapy in Brazil and refers to the possibility of instituting the use of medications that expand care approaches and problem resolution possibilities beyond the domain of the biomedical sciences, evoking alliances with so-called traditional and popular knowledge and practices. For this, we propose and discuss the concept of neo-traditional medicines as a comprehensive-interpretative category, verifying the approximation and distancing points assigned to it in contemporaneous anthropological literature. Beyond the domain of science over other fields of knowledge, we argue in favour of this category in order to present new arrangements and social dynamics that define Brazil's medication policies.

新传统医药:人种学对概念定义的贡献。
自1970年底以来,世界卫生组织鼓励制定公共政策,将其成员国提供的护理方法和治疗可能性扩大到技术科学保健之外。在巴西,这种做法的制度化与促进与药用植物使用有关的大众和传统知识有关。有了这种趋同作为一个争论的视野,在这个民族志中,我们研究了在巴西公共卫生政策中被称为生活药房的药品服务的制度化。这一术语在巴西植物疗法的整个历史中一直被使用,它指的是在生物医学科学领域之外建立使用药物的可能性,这种可能性扩大了护理方法和解决问题的可能性,唤起了与所谓的传统和流行知识和实践的联盟。为此,我们提出并讨论了新传统医学作为一个综合解释范畴的概念,验证了在当代人类学文献中分配给它的近似和距离点。在其他知识领域的科学领域之外,我们赞成这一类别,以呈现定义巴西药物政策的新安排和社会动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Bulletin of Medical History
Canadian Bulletin of Medical History HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Canadian Bulletin of Medical History / Bulletin canadien d"histoire de la médecine is the official organ of the Canadian Society for the History of Medicine/ Société canadienne d"histoire de la médecine and is the primary outlet in Canada for refereed scholarship in the history of medicine. This journal, published twice yearly, presents articles, notes, review articles, and book reviews in French and in English. No aspect of the general field is excluded as a matter of policy, though the particular focus is on scholarship in Canadian medical history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信