Identifying Major Health-System Challenges in Developing Countries Using PERs: Equity is the Elephant in the Room.

Sylvestre Gaudin, Abdo Yazbeck
{"title":"Identifying Major Health-System Challenges in Developing Countries Using PERs: Equity is the Elephant in the Room.","authors":"Sylvestre Gaudin,&nbsp;Abdo Yazbeck","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2021.1902671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite an unprecedented increase in official development assistance to health in the last 25 years, there is no systematic way to assess dominant patterns in health-system challenges and opportunities in developing countries. Developing a new global instrument for and by donors and development partners would be resource-intensive and cumbersome. In this article, we demonstrate that Public Expenditure Reviews (PERs) can be used to reveal such patterns. PERs are analytical reports financed and conducted by the World Bank that have been used for years to identify and prioritize country-specific health sector reform needs. In order to extend their use beyond the country level, a reading instrument is developed in the form of a questionnaire to systematically identify the different themes addressed in each PER. All PERs published over a period of ten years are reviewed for health sector content. A new database is created with data on 70 PERs, spanning 61 countries. Analysis of the data reveals dominant themes globally, patterns across development levels, and some regional variations. Our main finding is that issues related to equity strongly dominate and are relevant across all regions and income groups. In addition, the article highlights the usefulness of PERs beyond providing country-specific information. Without losing the country-focus and flexibility of PERs, thoughtful and minor investments in how Health PERs are conducted can create a relatively cheap and strongly operational instrument for building global knowledge bases on health sector needs and challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":73218,"journal":{"name":"Health systems and reform","volume":"7 2","pages":"e1902671"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems and reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2021.1902671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite an unprecedented increase in official development assistance to health in the last 25 years, there is no systematic way to assess dominant patterns in health-system challenges and opportunities in developing countries. Developing a new global instrument for and by donors and development partners would be resource-intensive and cumbersome. In this article, we demonstrate that Public Expenditure Reviews (PERs) can be used to reveal such patterns. PERs are analytical reports financed and conducted by the World Bank that have been used for years to identify and prioritize country-specific health sector reform needs. In order to extend their use beyond the country level, a reading instrument is developed in the form of a questionnaire to systematically identify the different themes addressed in each PER. All PERs published over a period of ten years are reviewed for health sector content. A new database is created with data on 70 PERs, spanning 61 countries. Analysis of the data reveals dominant themes globally, patterns across development levels, and some regional variations. Our main finding is that issues related to equity strongly dominate and are relevant across all regions and income groups. In addition, the article highlights the usefulness of PERs beyond providing country-specific information. Without losing the country-focus and flexibility of PERs, thoughtful and minor investments in how Health PERs are conducted can create a relatively cheap and strongly operational instrument for building global knowledge bases on health sector needs and challenges.

确定发展中国家使用PERs面临的主要卫生系统挑战:公平是房间里的大象。
尽管在过去25年中,卫生方面的官方发展援助空前增加,但没有系统的方法来评估发展中国家卫生系统挑战和机遇的主要模式。为捐助者和发展伙伴制定一项新的全球文书,并由其制定,将耗费大量资源,而且十分繁琐。在本文中,我们证明了公共支出审查(PERs)可以用来揭示这种模式。PERs是由世界银行资助和执行的分析性报告,多年来一直用于确定和确定具体国家卫生部门改革需要的优先次序。为了将它们的使用扩大到国家一级以外,编制了一份调查表形式的阅读工具,以便系统地确定每一份文件所涉及的不同主题。审查十年期间出版的所有战略报告的卫生部门内容。建立了一个新的数据库,其中包含61个国家的70个退休人员的数据。对数据的分析揭示了全球的主要主题、不同发展水平的模式以及一些区域差异。我们的主要发现是,与公平相关的问题在所有地区和收入群体中都占主导地位。此外,这篇文章还强调,除了提供具体国家的资料外,方案方案的有用性。在不失去以国家为重点和灵活性的情况下,对如何实施卫生部门的PERs进行深思熟虑的小额投资,可以创造一种相对廉价和可操作性强的工具,用于建立关于卫生部门需求和挑战的全球知识库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信