Misconstrued Notions and Misplaced Interventions: An Assessment of State Policy on Domestic Work in India.

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Indian Journal of Labour Economics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-09 DOI:10.1007/s41027-021-00334-w
N Neetha
{"title":"Misconstrued Notions and Misplaced Interventions: An Assessment of State Policy on Domestic Work in India.","authors":"N Neetha","doi":"10.1007/s41027-021-00334-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the informal employment relationship that marks the paid domestic work sector, this paper examines the important state interventions in India which follow the ILO convention on domestic work. The understanding that the sector is homogenous and thus could be regulated or managed through uniform intervention, whether legal or otherwise, has prevailed. This was even when existing studies have demonstrated the existence of segmented labour markets with varying employer, work and worker identities. The extension of the Minimum Wages Act to domestic workers, the draft National Policy on Domestic Work, and the Domestic Workers Sector Skill Council (DWSSC) set up under the National Skill Development Council of the Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship of Government of India, are examined in the paper in detail. The paper highlights how various state interventions have outlined the sector, the work, the workers and their everyday experiences and negotiations in terms of extending or framing these interventions. Examining the assumptions and objectives that have defined the formation of Domestic Workers Sector Skill Development council and its functioning, the paper argues that the attempt to corporatize the sector is a classic case of how the state tends to ignore the specificities that feature the sector leading to its poor impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":34915,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Labour Economics","volume":" ","pages":"543-564"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41027-021-00334-w","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Labour Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-021-00334-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the informal employment relationship that marks the paid domestic work sector, this paper examines the important state interventions in India which follow the ILO convention on domestic work. The understanding that the sector is homogenous and thus could be regulated or managed through uniform intervention, whether legal or otherwise, has prevailed. This was even when existing studies have demonstrated the existence of segmented labour markets with varying employer, work and worker identities. The extension of the Minimum Wages Act to domestic workers, the draft National Policy on Domestic Work, and the Domestic Workers Sector Skill Council (DWSSC) set up under the National Skill Development Council of the Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship of Government of India, are examined in the paper in detail. The paper highlights how various state interventions have outlined the sector, the work, the workers and their everyday experiences and negotiations in terms of extending or framing these interventions. Examining the assumptions and objectives that have defined the formation of Domestic Workers Sector Skill Development council and its functioning, the paper argues that the attempt to corporatize the sector is a classic case of how the state tends to ignore the specificities that feature the sector leading to its poor impact.

误解的观念和错位的干预:对印度家务工作国家政策的评估。
鉴于非正规就业关系标志着有偿家务劳动部门,本文考察了印度遵循国际劳工组织关于家务劳动公约的重要国家干预措施。人们普遍认为,该行业是同质的,因此可以通过统一的干预(无论是合法的还是其他的)来进行监管或管理。即使在现有研究表明存在雇主、工作和工人身份不同的细分劳动力市场的情况下也是如此。将《最低工资法》扩展到家政工人,国家家政工作政策草案,以及在印度政府技能发展和创业部国家技能发展委员会下设立的家政工人部门技能委员会(DWSSC),在本文中进行了详细审查。本文强调了各种国家干预如何概述了部门、工作、工人及其日常经验,以及在扩展或构建这些干预方面的谈判。考察了定义家政工人部门技能发展委员会的形成及其运作的假设和目标,本文认为,将该部门公司化的尝试是一个典型的案例,说明国家往往忽视该部门的特点,导致其影响不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Labour Economics
Indian Journal of Labour Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Labour Economics (IJLE) is one of the few prominent Journals of its kind from South Asia. It provides eminent economists and academicians an exclusive forum for an analysis and understanding of issues pertaining to labour economics, industrial relations including supply and demand of labour services, personnel economics, distribution of income, unions and collective bargaining, applied and policy issues in labour economics, and labour markets and demographics. The journal includes peer reviewed articles, research notes, sections on promising new theoretical developments, comparative labour market policies or subjects that have the attention of labour economists and labour market students in general, particularly in the context of India and other developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信