Review: Diabetes self-care management practices among insulin-taking patients.

Journal of research in nursing : JRN Pub Date : 2018-11-01 Epub Date: 2018-07-23 DOI:10.1177/1744987118782319
Jonathan Clough
{"title":"Review: Diabetes self-care management practices among insulin-taking patients.","authors":"Jonathan Clough","doi":"10.1177/1744987118782319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although set in Jordan, this exploration of diabetes self-care management (DSCM) practices utilising the ‘40 Item Diabetes Self-Management Scale’ (Gharaibeh et al., 2017) emphasises to us that DSCM could be improved in all insulin-taking patients, wherever they are. I return to this point later. Furthermore, as well as the identified predictors of DSCM, such as education and training, age, etc., cultural barriers are also recognised as potentially being responsible for poorer levels of DSCM, particularly in the case of Jordanian females. This of course resonates with current knowledge that diabetes education and care need to be culturally appropriate in order to be effective in improving DSCM (Creamer et al., 2016). The results from the authors’ research clearly indicated that in the sample group the patients with type 1 diabetes demonstrated a higher level of DSCM than those with type 2 diabetes and queried why this might be so, postulating that, since many of the type 2 diabetics were also on oral hypoglycaemic medication, the burden of diabetes might thus have been higher. However, it is also reported that two-thirds of the sample group were on both insulin and oral hypoglycaemics, so some of the type 1 diabetics were also on oral hypoglycaemics. This caused me to wonder whether this group of type 1s showed similar characteristics of DSCM to the type 2 patients. This is not made clear in the reviewed study, and could help clarify the distinction between DSCM in type 1 and 2 diabetics – that additional medication alters DSCM in type 1 and 2, or that it is just that type 2 diabetics have poorer levels of DSCM? This of course leads us to question just why this is so. Another area that could have been further explored regarding the differences between DSCM in type 1 and 2 diabetes concerns age. It is known that as patients age their DSCM declines, which the reviewed study also demonstrates. However, it would have been useful to compare patient ages between the two types of diabetes. Type 1 diabetes tends to occur earlier in life, whereas type 2 tends to occur later. This might help explain why the type 2 diabetics had reduced levels of DSCM, since as a group they would more likely be older, although this is not clear within the paper.","PeriodicalId":171309,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in nursing : JRN","volume":" ","pages":"566-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1744987118782319","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in nursing : JRN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987118782319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although set in Jordan, this exploration of diabetes self-care management (DSCM) practices utilising the ‘40 Item Diabetes Self-Management Scale’ (Gharaibeh et al., 2017) emphasises to us that DSCM could be improved in all insulin-taking patients, wherever they are. I return to this point later. Furthermore, as well as the identified predictors of DSCM, such as education and training, age, etc., cultural barriers are also recognised as potentially being responsible for poorer levels of DSCM, particularly in the case of Jordanian females. This of course resonates with current knowledge that diabetes education and care need to be culturally appropriate in order to be effective in improving DSCM (Creamer et al., 2016). The results from the authors’ research clearly indicated that in the sample group the patients with type 1 diabetes demonstrated a higher level of DSCM than those with type 2 diabetes and queried why this might be so, postulating that, since many of the type 2 diabetics were also on oral hypoglycaemic medication, the burden of diabetes might thus have been higher. However, it is also reported that two-thirds of the sample group were on both insulin and oral hypoglycaemics, so some of the type 1 diabetics were also on oral hypoglycaemics. This caused me to wonder whether this group of type 1s showed similar characteristics of DSCM to the type 2 patients. This is not made clear in the reviewed study, and could help clarify the distinction between DSCM in type 1 and 2 diabetics – that additional medication alters DSCM in type 1 and 2, or that it is just that type 2 diabetics have poorer levels of DSCM? This of course leads us to question just why this is so. Another area that could have been further explored regarding the differences between DSCM in type 1 and 2 diabetes concerns age. It is known that as patients age their DSCM declines, which the reviewed study also demonstrates. However, it would have been useful to compare patient ages between the two types of diabetes. Type 1 diabetes tends to occur earlier in life, whereas type 2 tends to occur later. This might help explain why the type 2 diabetics had reduced levels of DSCM, since as a group they would more likely be older, although this is not clear within the paper.
综述:胰岛素服用患者的糖尿病自我保健管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信