[Social stigma in mental illness: A review of concepts, methods and empirical evidence].

Q3 Medicine
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Pub Date : 2022-06-10 Epub Date: 2021-08-10 DOI:10.22365/jpsych.2021.039
Anastasia Zissi
{"title":"[Social stigma in mental illness: A review of concepts, methods and empirical evidence].","authors":"Anastasia Zissi","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2021.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sixty years are coming close since the first edition of the book by Goffman on social stigma, and research that connects it with mental illness has produced significant knowledge across different scientific fields, such as psychiatry and social sciences. This paper aims at providing a review of that scientific knowledge published over the last decades, and covers the following topics: a) basic theoretical concepts related to social stigma, such as public stigma, self-stigma, structural stigma and stigma by courtesy, b) representative findings of international empirical studies in regard to public attitudes towards mental illness, c) the measurement of social stigma in mental illness and the development of methodologies, such as scales and vignettes, d) the understanding of social stigma as a mechanism of producing and reproducing social inequalities in a form of symbolic power, e) the psychological and social consequences of social stigma on people' s lives-targets of social stigma, themselves and their families, and, finally, the public campaigns designed and delivered to fight social stigma. Recent advances in the theory of social stigma, as proposed by Pescosolido & Martin, conceptualize social stigma as a dialectic process enacted within a specific socio-historical context of power relations and Link & Phelan give insights of the processes through which social stigma, either implicitly or explicitly, produced and legitimated by institutional practices. International evidence drawn by public surveys on attitudes towards mental illness show that despite the overall negative attitudes, there are some positive changes that are related to people's openness and willingness to share their mental health difficulties with others and to seek professional help. Multi-dimensional and concept specific measures are most appropriate to use. Campaigns designed and delivered to fight stigma in mental illness needs to regenerate their contents and their strategy towards the recovery model communicating to the general public messages of hope and prospect.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2021.039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sixty years are coming close since the first edition of the book by Goffman on social stigma, and research that connects it with mental illness has produced significant knowledge across different scientific fields, such as psychiatry and social sciences. This paper aims at providing a review of that scientific knowledge published over the last decades, and covers the following topics: a) basic theoretical concepts related to social stigma, such as public stigma, self-stigma, structural stigma and stigma by courtesy, b) representative findings of international empirical studies in regard to public attitudes towards mental illness, c) the measurement of social stigma in mental illness and the development of methodologies, such as scales and vignettes, d) the understanding of social stigma as a mechanism of producing and reproducing social inequalities in a form of symbolic power, e) the psychological and social consequences of social stigma on people' s lives-targets of social stigma, themselves and their families, and, finally, the public campaigns designed and delivered to fight social stigma. Recent advances in the theory of social stigma, as proposed by Pescosolido & Martin, conceptualize social stigma as a dialectic process enacted within a specific socio-historical context of power relations and Link & Phelan give insights of the processes through which social stigma, either implicitly or explicitly, produced and legitimated by institutional practices. International evidence drawn by public surveys on attitudes towards mental illness show that despite the overall negative attitudes, there are some positive changes that are related to people's openness and willingness to share their mental health difficulties with others and to seek professional help. Multi-dimensional and concept specific measures are most appropriate to use. Campaigns designed and delivered to fight stigma in mental illness needs to regenerate their contents and their strategy towards the recovery model communicating to the general public messages of hope and prospect.

[精神疾病的社会耻辱:概念、方法和经验证据的回顾]。
距戈夫曼关于社会耻辱的书的第一版出版已近60年,将其与精神疾病联系起来的研究已经在不同的科学领域产生了重要的知识,如精神病学和社会科学。本文旨在对过去几十年发表的科学知识进行综述,并涵盖以下主题:A)与社会耻感相关的基本理论概念,如公众耻感、自我耻感、结构性耻感和礼貌耻感;b)公众对精神疾病态度的国际实证研究的代表性发现;c)精神疾病社会耻感的测量和方法的发展,如量表和小插图;D)理解社会耻辱是一种以象征权力的形式产生和再生产社会不平等的机制;e)社会耻辱对人们生活的心理和社会后果——社会耻辱的目标,他们自己和他们的家庭,最后,设计和实施的公共运动,以对抗社会耻辱。由Pescosolido和Martin提出的社会耻辱理论的最新进展将社会耻辱概念化为在权力关系的特定社会历史背景下制定的辩证法过程,Link和Phelan给出了社会耻辱的过程,无论是隐性的还是显性的,都是通过制度实践产生和合法化的。公众对精神疾病的态度调查得出的国际证据表明,尽管总体上是消极的态度,但也有一些积极的变化,这些变化与人们开放和愿意与他人分享他们的精神健康困难和寻求专业帮助有关。多维度和概念特定度量最适合使用。为消除精神疾病中的污名而设计和开展的运动需要更新其内容和战略,以实现向公众传达希望和前景信息的康复模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信