Base editors: Expanding the types of DNA damage products harnessed for genome editing

Sifeng Gu, Zsolt Bodai, Quinn T. Cowan, Alexis C. Komor
{"title":"Base editors: Expanding the types of DNA damage products harnessed for genome editing","authors":"Sifeng Gu,&nbsp;Zsolt Bodai,&nbsp;Quinn T. Cowan,&nbsp;Alexis C. Komor","doi":"10.1016/j.ggedit.2021.100005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Base editors are an innovative addition to the genome editing toolbox that introduced a new genome editing strategy to the field. Instead of using double-stranded DNA breaks, base editors use nucleobase modification chemistry to efficiently and precisely incorporate single nucleotide variants (SNVs) into the genome of living cells. Two classes of DNA base editors currently exist: deoxycytidine deamination-derived editors (CBEs, which facilitate C•G to T•A mutations) and deoxyadenosine deamination-derived base editors (ABEs, which facilitate A•T to G•C mutations). More recently, the development of mitochondrial base editors allowed the introduction of C•G to T•A mutations into mitochondrial DNA as well. Base editors show great potential as therapeutic agents and research tools, and extensive studies have been carried out to improve upon the original base editor constructs to aid researchers in a variety of disciplines. Despite their widespread use, there are few publications that focus on elucidating the biological pathways involved during the processing of base editor intermediates. Because base editors introduce unique types of DNA damage products (a U•G mismatch with a DNA backbone nick for CBEs, and an I•T mismatch with a DNA backbone nick for ABEs) to facilitate genome editing, a deep understanding of the DNA damage repair pathways that facilitate or impede base editing represents an important aspect for the further expansion and improvement of the technologies. Here, we first review canonical deoxyuridine, deoxyinosine, and single-stranded break repair. Then, we discuss how interactions among these different repair processes can lead to different base editing outcomes. Through this review, we hope to promote thoughtful discussions on the DNA repair mechanisms of base editing, as well as help researchers in the improvement of current base editors and the development of new base editors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73137,"journal":{"name":"Gene and genome editing","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ggedit.2021.100005","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gene and genome editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666388021000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Base editors are an innovative addition to the genome editing toolbox that introduced a new genome editing strategy to the field. Instead of using double-stranded DNA breaks, base editors use nucleobase modification chemistry to efficiently and precisely incorporate single nucleotide variants (SNVs) into the genome of living cells. Two classes of DNA base editors currently exist: deoxycytidine deamination-derived editors (CBEs, which facilitate C•G to T•A mutations) and deoxyadenosine deamination-derived base editors (ABEs, which facilitate A•T to G•C mutations). More recently, the development of mitochondrial base editors allowed the introduction of C•G to T•A mutations into mitochondrial DNA as well. Base editors show great potential as therapeutic agents and research tools, and extensive studies have been carried out to improve upon the original base editor constructs to aid researchers in a variety of disciplines. Despite their widespread use, there are few publications that focus on elucidating the biological pathways involved during the processing of base editor intermediates. Because base editors introduce unique types of DNA damage products (a U•G mismatch with a DNA backbone nick for CBEs, and an I•T mismatch with a DNA backbone nick for ABEs) to facilitate genome editing, a deep understanding of the DNA damage repair pathways that facilitate or impede base editing represents an important aspect for the further expansion and improvement of the technologies. Here, we first review canonical deoxyuridine, deoxyinosine, and single-stranded break repair. Then, we discuss how interactions among these different repair processes can lead to different base editing outcomes. Through this review, we hope to promote thoughtful discussions on the DNA repair mechanisms of base editing, as well as help researchers in the improvement of current base editors and the development of new base editors.

碱基编辑器:扩展用于基因组编辑的DNA损伤产物的类型
碱基编辑器是基因组编辑工具箱的一个创新补充,它向该领域引入了一种新的基因组编辑策略。碱基编辑器不使用双链DNA断裂,而是使用核碱基修饰化学来有效和精确地将单核苷酸变体(snv)整合到活细胞的基因组中。目前存在两类DNA碱基编辑器:脱氧胞苷脱氨衍生编辑器(CBEs,促进C•G到T•A突变)和脱氧腺苷脱氨衍生碱基编辑器(ABEs,促进A•T到G•C突变)。最近,线粒体碱基编辑器的发展也允许将C•G到T•A突变引入线粒体DNA。碱基编辑器显示出作为治疗剂和研究工具的巨大潜力,并且已经开展了广泛的研究来改进原始碱基编辑器结构,以帮助各种学科的研究人员。尽管它们被广泛使用,但很少有出版物关注于阐明碱基编辑器中间体加工过程中涉及的生物学途径。由于碱基编辑器引入了独特类型的DNA损伤产物(cbe的U•G错配与DNA主干缺口,ABEs的I•T错配与DNA主干缺口)来促进基因组编辑,因此深入了解促进或阻碍碱基编辑的DNA损伤修复途径是进一步扩展和改进技术的重要方面。在这里,我们首先回顾了典型的脱氧尿苷、脱氧肌苷和单链断裂修复。然后,我们讨论了这些不同修复过程之间的相互作用如何导致不同的碱基编辑结果。通过这篇综述,我们希望能促进对碱基编辑的DNA修复机制的深入探讨,并有助于研究人员改进现有的碱基编辑器和开发新的碱基编辑器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
44 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信