Validation of the Bangla WHO-5 Well-being Index.

Global mental health (Cambridge, England) Pub Date : 2021-07-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2021.26
Md Omar Faruk, Farzana Alam, Kamal Uddin Ahmed Chowdhury, Tanjir Rashid Soron
{"title":"Validation of the Bangla WHO-5 Well-being Index.","authors":"Md Omar Faruk,&nbsp;Farzana Alam,&nbsp;Kamal Uddin Ahmed Chowdhury,&nbsp;Tanjir Rashid Soron","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2021.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subjective wellbeing in terms of objective outcome can be useful to determine the level of progress in clinical practice as well as research studies in Bangladesh. Besides, cultural understanding of well-being for Bangladeshi population is also equally important to report. A valid Bangla version of the five-item WHO Well-being Index can be a suitable measure to achieve the purposes. Therefore, the present study aimed at validating the WHO-5 Well-being Index for general population in Bangladesh.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After following the standard procedures for translation, back-translation, and committee translation, the initial Bangla version of the scale was developed and pretested. Based on the feedback during pretesting, a slight modification was made and the final version was developed. This final version was administered to 269 participants of different socioeconomic backgrounds to find out the reliability and validity of the scale from March 2019 to May 2019. The data analysis was conducted using SPSS 24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (<i>α</i> = 0.754) and test-retest reliability (<i>r</i> = 0.713), divergent validity (<i>r</i> = -0.443, <i>p</i> < 0.01 with the Bangla version of Perceived Stress Scale-10) and convergent validity (<i>r</i> = 0.542, <i>p</i> < 0.01 with the Bangla version of Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale). The data also yielded one-factor structure for the scale in exploratory factor analysis explaining 38.68% of total variance. The factor-structure was further supported in the confirmatory factor analysis (χ<sup>2</sup> = 295.852, χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.017, RMSEA = 0.062, CFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.964, and SRMR = 0.0255).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggested the Bangla version of the WHO-5 Well-being Index is a psychometrically valid and reliable tool for general adult population in Bangladeshi when it comes to measuring subjective well-being both in clinical practice and research studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520633,"journal":{"name":"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)","volume":" ","pages":"e26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/gmh.2021.26","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2021.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: Subjective wellbeing in terms of objective outcome can be useful to determine the level of progress in clinical practice as well as research studies in Bangladesh. Besides, cultural understanding of well-being for Bangladeshi population is also equally important to report. A valid Bangla version of the five-item WHO Well-being Index can be a suitable measure to achieve the purposes. Therefore, the present study aimed at validating the WHO-5 Well-being Index for general population in Bangladesh.

Methods: After following the standard procedures for translation, back-translation, and committee translation, the initial Bangla version of the scale was developed and pretested. Based on the feedback during pretesting, a slight modification was made and the final version was developed. This final version was administered to 269 participants of different socioeconomic backgrounds to find out the reliability and validity of the scale from March 2019 to May 2019. The data analysis was conducted using SPSS 24.

Results: The scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.754) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.713), divergent validity (r = -0.443, p < 0.01 with the Bangla version of Perceived Stress Scale-10) and convergent validity (r = 0.542, p < 0.01 with the Bangla version of Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale). The data also yielded one-factor structure for the scale in exploratory factor analysis explaining 38.68% of total variance. The factor-structure was further supported in the confirmatory factor analysis (χ2 = 295.852, χ2/df = 2.017, RMSEA = 0.062, CFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.964, and SRMR = 0.0255).

Conclusion: The findings suggested the Bangla version of the WHO-5 Well-being Index is a psychometrically valid and reliable tool for general adult population in Bangladeshi when it comes to measuring subjective well-being both in clinical practice and research studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

孟加拉国世卫组织-5幸福指数的验证。
背景:客观结果方面的主观幸福感可以用于确定孟加拉国临床实践和研究的进展水平。此外,孟加拉国人口对福祉的文化理解也同样重要。有效的孟加拉国版世卫组织五项幸福指数可以是实现这一目标的适当措施。因此,本研究旨在验证孟加拉国一般人口的世卫组织5幸福指数。方法:按照标准的翻译、反译、委员会翻译程序,编制孟加拉语量表初版并进行预测。根据预测时的反馈,我们做了一些修改,最终开发出了最终版本。最终版本于2019年3月至2019年5月对269名不同社会经济背景的参与者进行了管理,以确定量表的信度和效度。数据分析采用SPSS 24软件。结果:量表具有可接受的内部一致性(α = 0.754)、重测信度(r = 0.713)、发散效度(r = -0.443,与孟加拉语版感知压力量表-10比较p < 0.01)和趋同效度(r = 0.542,与孟加拉语版沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表比较p < 0.01)。在探索性因子分析中,数据也产生了单因素结构,解释了38.68%的总方差。验证性因子分析进一步支持因子结构(χ2 = 295.852, χ2/df = 2.017, RMSEA = 0.062, CFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.964, SRMR = 0.0255)。结论:研究结果表明,在临床实践和研究中,孟加拉国版的WHO-5幸福指数对于孟加拉国普通成年人来说是一种心理计量学上有效和可靠的衡量主观幸福感的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信