Hip and Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength in Women with and without Urgency and Frequency Predominant Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

Stefanie N Foster, Theresa M Spitznagle, Lori J Tuttle, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Karen Steger-May, Jerry L Lowder, Melanie R Meister, Chiara Ghetti, Jinli Wang, Michael J Mueller, Marcie Harris-Hayes
{"title":"Hip and Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength in Women with and without Urgency and Frequency Predominant Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.","authors":"Stefanie N Foster,&nbsp;Theresa M Spitznagle,&nbsp;Lori J Tuttle,&nbsp;Siobhan Sutcliffe,&nbsp;Karen Steger-May,&nbsp;Jerry L Lowder,&nbsp;Melanie R Meister,&nbsp;Chiara Ghetti,&nbsp;Jinli Wang,&nbsp;Michael J Mueller,&nbsp;Marcie Harris-Hayes","doi":"10.1097/jwh.0000000000000209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urgency and frequency are common lower urinary tract symptoms (UF-LUTS) in women. There is limited evidence to guide physical therapist-led treatment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare hip and pelvic floor muscle strength between women with and without UF-LUTS. We hypothesized women with UF-LUTS would demonstrate 1) diminished hip external rotator and abductor strength and 2) equivalent pelvic floor strength and diminished endurance compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A matched case-control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women with UF-LUTS (cases) and controls were matched on age, body mass index (BMI), vaginal parity. Examiner measured participants' 1) hip external rotator and abductor strength via dynamometry (maximum voluntary effort against fixed resistance) and 2) pelvic floor muscle strength (peak squeeze pressure) and endurance (squeeze pressure over a 10 second hold) via vaginal manometry. Values compared between cases and controls with paired-sample t-tests (hip) or Wilcoxon signed rank tests (pelvic floor).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 pairs (42 women): Hip external rotation (67.0 ± 19.0 N vs 83.6 ± 21.5 N; P=0.005) and hip abduction strength (163.1 ± 48.1 N vs 190.1 ± 53.1 N; P=0.04) were significantly lower in cases than controls. There was no significant difference in pelvic floor strength (36.8 ± 19.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>0 vs 41.8 ± 21.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>0; <i>P</i>=0.40) or endurance (234.0 ± 149.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>0*seconds vs 273.4 ± 149.1 cmH<sub>2</sub>0*seconds; <i>P</i>=0.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with UF-LUTS had weaker hip external rotator and abductor muscles, but similar pelvic floor strength and endurance compared to controls. Hip strength may be important to assess in patients with UF-LUTS, further research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345818/pdf/nihms-1688858.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Urgency and frequency are common lower urinary tract symptoms (UF-LUTS) in women. There is limited evidence to guide physical therapist-led treatment.

Objectives: To compare hip and pelvic floor muscle strength between women with and without UF-LUTS. We hypothesized women with UF-LUTS would demonstrate 1) diminished hip external rotator and abductor strength and 2) equivalent pelvic floor strength and diminished endurance compared to controls.

Study design: A matched case-control study.

Methods: Women with UF-LUTS (cases) and controls were matched on age, body mass index (BMI), vaginal parity. Examiner measured participants' 1) hip external rotator and abductor strength via dynamometry (maximum voluntary effort against fixed resistance) and 2) pelvic floor muscle strength (peak squeeze pressure) and endurance (squeeze pressure over a 10 second hold) via vaginal manometry. Values compared between cases and controls with paired-sample t-tests (hip) or Wilcoxon signed rank tests (pelvic floor).

Results: 21 pairs (42 women): Hip external rotation (67.0 ± 19.0 N vs 83.6 ± 21.5 N; P=0.005) and hip abduction strength (163.1 ± 48.1 N vs 190.1 ± 53.1 N; P=0.04) were significantly lower in cases than controls. There was no significant difference in pelvic floor strength (36.8 ± 19.9 cmH20 vs 41.8 ± 21.0 cmH20; P=0.40) or endurance (234.0 ± 149.6 cmH20*seconds vs 273.4 ± 149.1 cmH20*seconds; P=0.24).

Conclusion: Women with UF-LUTS had weaker hip external rotator and abductor muscles, but similar pelvic floor strength and endurance compared to controls. Hip strength may be important to assess in patients with UF-LUTS, further research is needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

有或无急迫性和频率下尿路症状的女性髋关节和盆底肌力
背景:急迫性和频率是女性常见的下尿路症状(UF-LUTS)。指导物理治疗师主导的治疗的证据有限。目的:比较有和没有UF-LUTS的女性髋关节和盆底肌力。我们假设与对照组相比,患有UF-LUTS的女性会表现出1)髋外旋肌和外展肌力量减弱,2)骨盆底力量和耐力减弱。研究设计:配对病例对照研究。方法:将UF-LUTS患者(病例)与对照组在年龄、体重指数(BMI)、阴道胎次等方面进行匹配。主考官通过测力法(对固定阻力的最大自主力)测量参与者的髋关节外旋肌和外展肌力量,通过阴道测压法测量参与者的骨盆底肌肉力量(峰值挤压压力)和耐力(保持10秒的挤压压力)。用配对样本t检验(髋部)或Wilcoxon符号秩检验(骨盆底)比较病例和对照组之间的值。结果:21对(42名女性):髋关节外旋(67.0±19.0 N vs 83.6±21.5 N);P=0.005)和髋关节外展强度(163.1±48.1 N vs 190.1±53.1 N);P=0.04)显著低于对照组。盆底强度(36.8±19.9 cmH20 vs 41.8±21.0 cmH20)无显著差异;P=0.40)或耐力(234.0±149.6 cmH20*秒vs 273.4±149.1 cmH20*秒);P = 0.24)。结论:与对照组相比,患有UF-LUTS的女性髋外旋肌和外展肌较弱,但骨盆底力量和耐力相似。髋部力量对UF-LUTS患者的评估可能很重要,需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信