Perspectives of Patients and Providers on the Use of Telemedicine for Chronic Disease Specialty Care in the Alaska Tribal Health System.

Elizabeth D Ferucci, Tammy L Choromanski, Rabecca I Arnold, Jaclynne K Richards, Cornelia M Jessen
{"title":"Perspectives of Patients and Providers on the Use of Telemedicine for Chronic Disease Specialty Care in the Alaska Tribal Health System.","authors":"Elizabeth D Ferucci, Tammy L Choromanski, Rabecca I Arnold, Jaclynne K Richards, Cornelia M Jessen","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are disparities in access to specialty care for chronic diseases in rural populations. Telemedicine has been proposed to improve access. Introduction: The objective of this study was to identify predictors of telemedicine use for chronic disease specialty care in the Alaska Tribal Health System. Materials and Methods: We collected data from patients and providers about benefits, barriers, and deciding factors for or against telemedicine use. Participants were recruited from three regional tribal health organizations in Alaska during 2019. Data were collected using a patient survey, a provider survey, and patient focus groups. Results: Of the 153 patients surveyed, 104 had never used telemedicine, and 71 (68% of never users) were open to it if offered. Of the 29 providers surveyed, 27 (93%) stated a preference for using telemedicine in the follow-up phase of care. In the focus groups conducted with telemedicine ever users (n = 23) and never users (n = 14), the identified barriers and benefits were similar, but never users were more likely to emphasize patient preference as a deciding factor, whereas ever users described clinic-related deciding factors more commonly. Relationship building before telemedicine visits was identified as important by some focus group participants. Discussion: This study adds to the literature on patient and provider views of benefits, barriers, and deciding factors for or against the use of telemedicine before the COVID-19 pandemic. These views may evolve over time. Conclusions: Patients and providers identify benefits of telemedicine that may outweigh the barriers in many settings.","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"535-543"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: There are disparities in access to specialty care for chronic diseases in rural populations. Telemedicine has been proposed to improve access. Introduction: The objective of this study was to identify predictors of telemedicine use for chronic disease specialty care in the Alaska Tribal Health System. Materials and Methods: We collected data from patients and providers about benefits, barriers, and deciding factors for or against telemedicine use. Participants were recruited from three regional tribal health organizations in Alaska during 2019. Data were collected using a patient survey, a provider survey, and patient focus groups. Results: Of the 153 patients surveyed, 104 had never used telemedicine, and 71 (68% of never users) were open to it if offered. Of the 29 providers surveyed, 27 (93%) stated a preference for using telemedicine in the follow-up phase of care. In the focus groups conducted with telemedicine ever users (n = 23) and never users (n = 14), the identified barriers and benefits were similar, but never users were more likely to emphasize patient preference as a deciding factor, whereas ever users described clinic-related deciding factors more commonly. Relationship building before telemedicine visits was identified as important by some focus group participants. Discussion: This study adds to the literature on patient and provider views of benefits, barriers, and deciding factors for or against the use of telemedicine before the COVID-19 pandemic. These views may evolve over time. Conclusions: Patients and providers identify benefits of telemedicine that may outweigh the barriers in many settings.
阿拉斯加州部落卫生系统慢性病专科护理中远程医疗的使用情况。
引言:在农村人口获得慢性病专科护理方面存在差异。远程医疗已被提出,以改善访问。简介:本研究的目的是确定远程医疗用于阿拉斯加部落卫生系统慢性病专科护理的预测因素。材料和方法:我们从患者和提供者那里收集了关于远程医疗使用的好处、障碍和决定因素的数据。参与者是在2019年期间从阿拉斯加的三个地区部落卫生组织招募的。通过患者调查、提供者调查和患者焦点小组收集数据。结果:153名接受调查的患者中,104名从未使用过远程医疗,71名(占从未使用过远程医疗的68%)如果提供远程医疗,他们会持开放态度。在接受调查的29家医疗服务提供者中,27家(93%)表示在后续护理阶段更倾向于使用远程医疗。在对远程医疗用户(n = 23)和非用户(n = 14)进行的焦点小组中,确定的障碍和益处相似,但非用户更有可能强调患者偏好是决定因素,而非用户更常见地描述与临床相关的决定因素。一些焦点小组参与者认为,在远程医疗访问之前建立关系很重要。讨论:本研究补充了关于患者和提供者在COVID-19大流行之前对使用远程医疗的益处、障碍和决定因素的看法。这些观点可能会随着时间的推移而演变。结论:在许多情况下,患者和提供者都认为远程医疗的好处可能超过了障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信