Four-subtest short-form of the WAIS-IV for assessment of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia

Carmen Dasí , Inmaculada Fuentes-Durá , Juan C. Ruiz , Marisa Navarro
{"title":"Four-subtest short-form of the WAIS-IV for assessment of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia","authors":"Carmen Dasí ,&nbsp;Inmaculada Fuentes-Durá ,&nbsp;Juan C. Ruiz ,&nbsp;Marisa Navarro","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsmen.2019.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The present study aimed to obtain a short form of the Spanish version of the WAIS-IV for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia that requires about half an hour to be administered. The reduced test can be very useful in clinical and research settings when an estimation of the intelligence quotient (IQ) is required to decide about intervention programs or to describe the sample.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A sample of 143 patients participated in the study, 91 out of them were the test group, and the other 52 were used for a cross-validation analysis. To increase the content validity, the decision was made to create a short form composed of a subtest of each of the four cognitive domains that the scale measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Several analyses showed that the best combination was composed of the Information, Block Design, Arithmetic, and Symbol Search subtests. Nine different criteria were calculated to evaluate the quality of the short form.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The data showed very good results for the criteria: correlations, difference of means, and cross-validation. The results were satisfactory for: category agreement, band of error, clinical accuracy, and reliability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101104,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)","volume":"14 3","pages":"Pages 139-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173505021000364/pdfft?md5=b5cf5d7161cb0f6d8a98f9793a9a67b5&pid=1-s2.0-S2173505021000364-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173505021000364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The present study aimed to obtain a short form of the Spanish version of the WAIS-IV for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia that requires about half an hour to be administered. The reduced test can be very useful in clinical and research settings when an estimation of the intelligence quotient (IQ) is required to decide about intervention programs or to describe the sample.

Materials and methods

A sample of 143 patients participated in the study, 91 out of them were the test group, and the other 52 were used for a cross-validation analysis. To increase the content validity, the decision was made to create a short form composed of a subtest of each of the four cognitive domains that the scale measures.

Results

Several analyses showed that the best combination was composed of the Information, Block Design, Arithmetic, and Symbol Search subtests. Nine different criteria were calculated to evaluate the quality of the short form.

Conclusions

The data showed very good results for the criteria: correlations, difference of means, and cross-validation. The results were satisfactory for: category agreement, band of error, clinical accuracy, and reliability.

用于评估被诊断为精神分裂症的患者的WAIS-IV的四亚测试简写
本研究旨在获得一种简短的西班牙语版本的WAIS-IV,用于诊断为精神分裂症的患者,需要大约半小时的时间来给药。在临床和研究环境中,当需要对智商(IQ)的估计来决定干预方案或描述样本时,简化测试非常有用。材料与方法本研究共纳入143例患者,其中试验组91例,其余52例进行交叉验证分析。为了提高内容的效度,我们决定创建一个简短的表格,由量表测量的四个认知领域中的每个领域的子测试组成。结果分析表明,信息测试、块设计测试、算术测试和符号搜索测试的组合效果最好。计算了九种不同的标准来评估短文的质量。结论数据在相关性、均数差异、交叉验证等标准上均取得了较好的结果。结果令人满意:分类一致性,误差范围,临床准确性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信