Aaron Brody, John Gallien, Brian Reed, John Hennessy, Michael J Twiner, Jerry Marogil
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Silicone Device for the Packing of Cutaneous Abscesses in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Aaron Brody, John Gallien, Brian Reed, John Hennessy, Michael J Twiner, Jerry Marogil","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S317713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traditional treatment of abscesses in the emergency department includes packing with gauze; however, this can add pain and discomfort to the procedure and frequently involves a follow-up visit for packing removal. Alternatives to gauze packing have been proposed, but they may have disadvantages in the context of emergency care. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the use of a novel silicone packing device - the Derma-Stent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized controlled pilot study of 50 patients from two urban emergency departments with uncomplicated superficial abscesses. The primary outcome was the likelihood of self-removal of packing gauze versus the silicone device. Secondary outcome measures included subjective clinician and patient metrics, such as pain and ease of use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients identified with simple cutaneous abscesses were randomized to intervention (packing with the novel silicone device, n=25) or standard care (gauze packing, n=25). Mean age was 36 years, 54% were female, and 96% identified as African American. Although it took longer to place, the silicone device (19.0 vs 15.3 minutes, <i>p</i>=0.03), pain scores were significantly lower (4.3/10 vs 7.1/10, <i>p</i>=0.008) and ease of use reported by physicians better in the silicone-device group (4.8/5 vs 4.0/5, <i>p</i>=0.002). A high unknown rate in the gauze-packing group limits discussion of the likelihood of self-removal; however, the silicone device was more likely to remain in place (60%) versus the gauze packing at 3 days (24%, <i>p</i>=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial compared the treatment of packing cutaneous abscesses with gauze versus using the silicone device. Limitations in the data prevent discussion on likelihood of self-removal. However, the silicone device was more likely to remain in place at day 3 follow-up and was equally effective to gauze packing in abscess reduction while also improving patient-reported pain scores. It did take longer to place the silicone device; however, physicians reported better ease of use and removal. This pilot study is encouraging for additional larger-scale trials that are required to further assess the utility of this device in the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":503614,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","volume":"13 ","pages":"335-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e5/f0/oaem-13-335.PMC8326928.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S317713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective: Traditional treatment of abscesses in the emergency department includes packing with gauze; however, this can add pain and discomfort to the procedure and frequently involves a follow-up visit for packing removal. Alternatives to gauze packing have been proposed, but they may have disadvantages in the context of emergency care. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the use of a novel silicone packing device - the Derma-Stent.
Methods: This was a randomized controlled pilot study of 50 patients from two urban emergency departments with uncomplicated superficial abscesses. The primary outcome was the likelihood of self-removal of packing gauze versus the silicone device. Secondary outcome measures included subjective clinician and patient metrics, such as pain and ease of use.
Results: Patients identified with simple cutaneous abscesses were randomized to intervention (packing with the novel silicone device, n=25) or standard care (gauze packing, n=25). Mean age was 36 years, 54% were female, and 96% identified as African American. Although it took longer to place, the silicone device (19.0 vs 15.3 minutes, p=0.03), pain scores were significantly lower (4.3/10 vs 7.1/10, p=0.008) and ease of use reported by physicians better in the silicone-device group (4.8/5 vs 4.0/5, p=0.002). A high unknown rate in the gauze-packing group limits discussion of the likelihood of self-removal; however, the silicone device was more likely to remain in place (60%) versus the gauze packing at 3 days (24%, p=0.01).
Conclusion: This pilot randomized controlled trial compared the treatment of packing cutaneous abscesses with gauze versus using the silicone device. Limitations in the data prevent discussion on likelihood of self-removal. However, the silicone device was more likely to remain in place at day 3 follow-up and was equally effective to gauze packing in abscess reduction while also improving patient-reported pain scores. It did take longer to place the silicone device; however, physicians reported better ease of use and removal. This pilot study is encouraging for additional larger-scale trials that are required to further assess the utility of this device in the emergency department.
目的:急诊科脓肿的传统治疗包括纱布包扎;然而,这可能会增加手术过程中的疼痛和不适,并且经常需要随访去除填充物。已经提出了纱布包装的替代方案,但它们在急诊护理中可能有缺点。本初步研究的目的是研究一种新型硅胶填充装置-真皮支架的使用。方法:这是一项随机对照的初步研究,来自两个城市急诊科的50例无并发症的浅表脓肿患者。主要结果是与硅胶装置相比,填充物纱布自我清除的可能性。次要结果测量包括临床医生和患者的主观指标,如疼痛和易用性。结果:确定为单纯性皮肤脓肿的患者随机分为干预组(用新型硅胶装置填充,n=25)或标准护理组(纱布填充,n=25)。平均年龄36岁,54%为女性,96%为非裔美国人。虽然硅胶装置放置时间较长(19.0 vs 15.3分钟,p=0.03),但疼痛评分明显较低(4.3/10 vs 7.1/10, p=0.008),医生报告的易用性更好(4.8/5 vs 4.0/5, p=0.002)。纱布填料群的高未知率限制了对自去除可能性的讨论;然而,与纱布包装相比,硅胶装置在3天后更有可能保持原位(60%)(24%,p=0.01)。结论:本随机对照试验比较了纱布填塞皮肤脓肿与硅胶填塞的治疗效果。数据的局限性阻碍了对自我移除可能性的讨论。然而,硅胶装置更有可能在第3天的随访中保持原位,并且在减少脓肿方面与纱布填塞同样有效,同时也改善了患者报告的疼痛评分。放置硅胶装置确实需要更长的时间;然而,医生报告更容易使用和移除。这项试点研究为进一步评估该装置在急诊科的效用所需的更多大规模试验提供了鼓舞。