Relationship between emergency department and inpatient occupancy and the likelihood of an emergency admission: a retrospective hospital database study.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-04 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2021-211229
Steven Wyatt, Ruchi Joshi, Janet M Mortimore, Mohammed A Mohammed
{"title":"Relationship between emergency department and inpatient occupancy and the likelihood of an emergency admission: a retrospective hospital database study.","authors":"Steven Wyatt,&nbsp;Ruchi Joshi,&nbsp;Janet M Mortimore,&nbsp;Mohammed A Mohammed","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2021-211229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigate whether admission from a consultant-led ED is associated with ED occupancy or crowding and inpatient (bed) occupancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used general additive logistic regression to explore the relationship between the probability of an ED patient being admitted, ED crowding and inpatient occupancy levels. We adjust for patient, temporal and attendance characteristics using data from 13 English NHS Hospital Trusts in 2019. We define quintiles of occupancy in ED and for four types of inpatients: emergency, overnight elective, day case and maternity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with periods of average occupancy in ED, a patient attending during a period of very high (upper quintile) occupancy was 3.3% less likely (relative risk (RR) 0.967, 95% CI 0.958 to 0.977) to be admitted, whereas a patient arriving at a time of low ED occupancy was 3.9% more likely (RR 1.039 95% CI 1.028 to 1.050) to be admitted. When the number of overnight elective, day-case and maternity inpatients reaches the upper quintile then the probability of admission from ED rises by 1.1% (RR 1.011 95% CI 1.001 to 1.021), 3.8% (RR 1.038 95% CI 1.025 to 1.051) and 1.0% (RR 1.010 95% CI 1.001 to 1.020), respectively. Compared with periods of average emergency inpatient occupancy, a patient attending during a period of very high emergency inpatient occupancy was 1.0% less likely (RR 0.990 95% CI 0.980 to 0.999) to be admitted and a patient arriving at a time of very low emergency inpatient occupancy was 0.8% less likely (RR 0.992 95% CI 0.958 to 0.977) to be admitted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Admission thresholds are modestly associated with ED and inpatient occupancy when these reach extreme levels. Admission thresholds are higher when the number of emergency inpatients is particularly high. This may indicate that riskier discharge decisions are taken when beds are full. Admission thresholds are also high when pressures within the hospital are particularly low, suggesting the potential to safely reduce avoidable admissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":410922,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","volume":" ","pages":"174-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emermed-2021-211229","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2021-211229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: We investigate whether admission from a consultant-led ED is associated with ED occupancy or crowding and inpatient (bed) occupancy.

Methods: We used general additive logistic regression to explore the relationship between the probability of an ED patient being admitted, ED crowding and inpatient occupancy levels. We adjust for patient, temporal and attendance characteristics using data from 13 English NHS Hospital Trusts in 2019. We define quintiles of occupancy in ED and for four types of inpatients: emergency, overnight elective, day case and maternity.

Results: Compared with periods of average occupancy in ED, a patient attending during a period of very high (upper quintile) occupancy was 3.3% less likely (relative risk (RR) 0.967, 95% CI 0.958 to 0.977) to be admitted, whereas a patient arriving at a time of low ED occupancy was 3.9% more likely (RR 1.039 95% CI 1.028 to 1.050) to be admitted. When the number of overnight elective, day-case and maternity inpatients reaches the upper quintile then the probability of admission from ED rises by 1.1% (RR 1.011 95% CI 1.001 to 1.021), 3.8% (RR 1.038 95% CI 1.025 to 1.051) and 1.0% (RR 1.010 95% CI 1.001 to 1.020), respectively. Compared with periods of average emergency inpatient occupancy, a patient attending during a period of very high emergency inpatient occupancy was 1.0% less likely (RR 0.990 95% CI 0.980 to 0.999) to be admitted and a patient arriving at a time of very low emergency inpatient occupancy was 0.8% less likely (RR 0.992 95% CI 0.958 to 0.977) to be admitted.

Conclusions: Admission thresholds are modestly associated with ED and inpatient occupancy when these reach extreme levels. Admission thresholds are higher when the number of emergency inpatients is particularly high. This may indicate that riskier discharge decisions are taken when beds are full. Admission thresholds are also high when pressures within the hospital are particularly low, suggesting the potential to safely reduce avoidable admissions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急诊科和住院病人占用率与急诊入院可能性之间的关系:一项回顾性医院数据库研究。
背景:我们调查咨询师领导的急诊科的入院是否与急诊科占用或拥挤和住院(床位)占用有关。方法:采用一般加性逻辑回归方法探讨急诊科患者入院概率、急诊科拥挤程度和住院病人占用率之间的关系。我们使用2019年13家英国NHS医院信托基金的数据对患者、时间和出勤特征进行了调整。我们定义五分之一的占用在急诊室和四种类型的住院病人:急诊,隔夜选择性,日间病例和产妇。结果:与平均占用期相比,在非常高(上五分位数)占用期就诊的患者入院的可能性降低3.3%(相对风险(RR) 0.967, 95% CI 0.958至0.977),而在低占用期就诊的患者入院的可能性增加3.9% (RR 1.039 95% CI 1.028至1.050)。当住院病人的数量达到上五分位数时,急诊科入院的概率分别上升1.1% (RR 1.011 95% CI 1.001 ~ 1.021)、3.8% (RR 1.038 95% CI 1.025 ~ 1.051)和1.0% (RR 1.010 95% CI 1.001 ~ 1.020)。与平均急诊住院率相比,在急诊住院率非常高的时期就诊的患者入院的可能性降低了1.0% (RR 0.990 95% CI 0.980至0.999),在急诊住院率非常低的时期就诊的患者入院的可能性降低了0.8% (RR 0.992 95% CI 0.958至0.977)。结论:当入院阈值达到极端水平时,入院阈值与ED和住院率有一定的相关性。急诊住院人数特别多时,入院门槛较高。这可能表明,当床位满时,会采取更危险的出院决定。当医院内部压力特别低时,入院门槛也很高,这表明有可能安全地减少可避免的入院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信