Perceptions of Telehealth Among Commercial Members Who Responded to a Patient-Experience Survey During the Onset of the Coronavirus-19 Pandemic.

Alina Rossini, Alexis Parente, Benjamin Howell
{"title":"Perceptions of Telehealth Among Commercial Members Who Responded to a Patient-Experience Survey During the Onset of the Coronavirus-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Alina Rossini,&nbsp;Alexis Parente,&nbsp;Benjamin Howell","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The body of literature on telehealth perception among commercial members is limited. Therefore, we administered a patient-experienced survey (Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems [CG-CAHPS]) to determine member perceptions of telehealth, including willingness to pay for it and the likelihood to access it again. <b>Methods:</b> This study used a cross-sectional design, and members were assigned into two groups: those who had a telehealth visit with their primary care provider (PCP) or a provider in the same practice and those who had a telehealth visit with a provider outside of their PCP's practice. Logistic regression models were used to observe group differences in telehealth perception. <b>Results:</b> A total of 444 members replied to the CG-CAHPS survey and had a virtual visit; 21.1% had a telehealth visit with a provider outside of their PCP's practice, and 78.8% had a telehealth visit with their PCP or a provider in the same practice. Compared with members who saw a provider outside of their PCP's practice, members who saw their PCP or a provider in the same practice had 3.76 higher odds (confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.49-9.44) of rating in-person care as no different than virtual care; 2.29 higher odds (95% CI: 1.30-4.04) of reporting they would likely use telehealth again in the future; and 1.70 higher odds (95% CI: 0.99-2.91) of responding that they would be willing to pay an in-office visit copay for a telehealth visit. <b>Conclusion:</b> These results suggest that the familiarity of a member's PCP extends to the provider's practice and impacts member outlook on telehealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"551-557"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The body of literature on telehealth perception among commercial members is limited. Therefore, we administered a patient-experienced survey (Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems [CG-CAHPS]) to determine member perceptions of telehealth, including willingness to pay for it and the likelihood to access it again. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional design, and members were assigned into two groups: those who had a telehealth visit with their primary care provider (PCP) or a provider in the same practice and those who had a telehealth visit with a provider outside of their PCP's practice. Logistic regression models were used to observe group differences in telehealth perception. Results: A total of 444 members replied to the CG-CAHPS survey and had a virtual visit; 21.1% had a telehealth visit with a provider outside of their PCP's practice, and 78.8% had a telehealth visit with their PCP or a provider in the same practice. Compared with members who saw a provider outside of their PCP's practice, members who saw their PCP or a provider in the same practice had 3.76 higher odds (confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.49-9.44) of rating in-person care as no different than virtual care; 2.29 higher odds (95% CI: 1.30-4.04) of reporting they would likely use telehealth again in the future; and 1.70 higher odds (95% CI: 0.99-2.91) of responding that they would be willing to pay an in-office visit copay for a telehealth visit. Conclusion: These results suggest that the familiarity of a member's PCP extends to the provider's practice and impacts member outlook on telehealth.

在冠状病毒-19大流行爆发期间,响应患者体验调查的商业成员对远程医疗的看法。
引言:关于商业成员远程医疗感知的文献是有限的。因此,我们进行了一项患者经验调查(医疗保健提供者和系统的临床医生和群体消费者评估[CG-CAHPS]),以确定成员对远程医疗的看法,包括付费意愿和再次访问的可能性。方法:本研究采用横断面设计,并将成员分为两组:与他们的初级保健提供者(PCP)或同一执业的提供者进行远程医疗访问的组和与他们的PCP执业之外的提供者进行远程医疗访问的组。采用Logistic回归模型观察远程医疗感知的组间差异。结果:共有444名会员回复了CG-CAHPS调查并进行了虚拟访问;21.1%的人曾与他们的PCP执业之外的提供者进行过远程医疗访问,78.8%的人曾与他们的PCP或相同执业的提供者进行过远程医疗访问。与在他们的PCP实践之外看到提供者的成员相比,在他们的PCP或相同实践中看到提供者的成员将亲自护理评为与虚拟护理没有区别的几率高3.76(置信区间[95% CI]: 1.49-9.44);报告他们将来可能再次使用远程医疗的几率(95% CI: 1.30-4.04)增加2.29;并且他们愿意为远程医疗访问支付办公室访问费用的几率(95% CI: 0.99-2.91)高出1.70。结论:这些结果表明,成员对PCP的熟悉程度延伸到提供者的实践中,并影响成员对远程医疗的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信