Technical Considerations for Sampling and Sample Preparation of Biomedical Samples for Trace Element Analysis.

Robert M Parr
{"title":"Technical Considerations for Sampling and Sample Preparation of Biomedical Samples for Trace Element Analysis.","authors":"Robert M Parr","doi":"10.6028/jres.091.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sampling and sample preparation procedures are to a large extent determined by the analytical method used since different methods vary in the amount of material required for analysis and in how this is pre-treated before being introduced into the measuring instrument. Judging from intercomparison studies conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the most widely applicable methods now in use are Neutron Activation Analysis, Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, and Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry, though the latter still seems to have insufficient sensitivity for many trace elements of biomedical interest. Common to all these methods is the problem of contaminating the sample before or during analysis. For many elements (e.g., As, Cd, Co, Cr, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, and V) sufficient control over contamination can only be achieved by the use of special tools and reagents, and by working in a controlled (dust-free) environment. Several important elements (e.g., As, Hg, Sb, and I) are subject to losses on drying or ashing, but can be recovered reliably if wet-ashed in a closed container such as a PTFE \"bomb.\" For representative sampling it is almost always necessary to start with several grams of material, and to homogenize this, if the effects of sample heterogeneity are to be reduced to an acceptable level. Quality assurance procedures covering all these aspects are difficult both to define and to apply. However, much can be learned from the statistical evaluation of results for duplicate samples, and from a determination of the limit of quantitation of the analytical procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":93321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)","volume":"91 2","pages":"51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658442/pdf/jres-91-051.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.091.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sampling and sample preparation procedures are to a large extent determined by the analytical method used since different methods vary in the amount of material required for analysis and in how this is pre-treated before being introduced into the measuring instrument. Judging from intercomparison studies conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the most widely applicable methods now in use are Neutron Activation Analysis, Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, and Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry, though the latter still seems to have insufficient sensitivity for many trace elements of biomedical interest. Common to all these methods is the problem of contaminating the sample before or during analysis. For many elements (e.g., As, Cd, Co, Cr, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, and V) sufficient control over contamination can only be achieved by the use of special tools and reagents, and by working in a controlled (dust-free) environment. Several important elements (e.g., As, Hg, Sb, and I) are subject to losses on drying or ashing, but can be recovered reliably if wet-ashed in a closed container such as a PTFE "bomb." For representative sampling it is almost always necessary to start with several grams of material, and to homogenize this, if the effects of sample heterogeneity are to be reduced to an acceptable level. Quality assurance procedures covering all these aspects are difficult both to define and to apply. However, much can be learned from the statistical evaluation of results for duplicate samples, and from a determination of the limit of quantitation of the analytical procedure.

微量元素分析用生物医学样品取样和样品制备的技术注意事项。
取样和样品制备程序在很大程度上取决于所使用的分析方法,因为不同的方法在分析所需的材料量以及在将其引入测量仪器之前如何进行预处理方面有所不同。从国际原子能机构(IAEA)进行的相互比较研究来看,目前使用的最广泛的方法是中子活化分析法、原子吸收光谱法和电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法,尽管后者似乎对许多生物医学感兴趣的微量元素仍不够敏感。所有这些方法的共同点是在分析之前或分析过程中污染样品的问题。对于许多元素(如As、Cd、Co、Cr、Mn、Mo、Ni、Pb、Sb和V),只有使用专用工具和试剂,并在受控(无尘)环境中工作,才能实现对污染的充分控制。一些重要元素(如As、Hg、Sb和I)在干燥或灰化过程中会发生损失,但如果在密闭容器(如PTFE“炸弹”)中进行湿法灰化,则可以可靠地回收。对于代表性取样,如果要将样品不均匀性的影响降低到可接受的水平,则几乎总是需要从几克材料开始,并将其均匀化。涵盖所有这些方面的质量保证程序很难定义和应用。然而,从重复样品结果的统计评估和分析程序定量限的确定中可以学到很多东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信