Implementation of a standardized clinical test kit for diagnostics of periprosthetic infections in the clinical routine.

4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Unfallchirurg Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s00113-021-01016-4
Y Gramlich, M Kremer, C Brüning, J Breuer, L Hofmann, A Klug, R Hoffmann
{"title":"Implementation of a standardized clinical test kit for diagnostics of periprosthetic infections in the clinical routine.","authors":"Y Gramlich,&nbsp;M Kremer,&nbsp;C Brüning,&nbsp;J Breuer,&nbsp;L Hofmann,&nbsp;A Klug,&nbsp;R Hoffmann","doi":"10.1007/s00113-021-01016-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of primary arthroplasties is increasing and the proportion of revision arthroplasties is becoming increasingly more important. The need for standardized and guideline-based diagnostics for the safe detection of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is becoming apparent. In the past 10 years various organizations have published definitions and diagnostic guidelines. The implementation of an inhouse standard test kit could help to simplify the process and could improve the diagnostic quality.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In 2016 a test kit was compiled in a monocentric prospective study, taking the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria 2014 and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria into account, which also fulfils the definitions of the ICM criteria 2018 and criteria of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society 2021. The test kit was implemented in the clinical setting of a special department for aseptic and septic revision arthroplasty. The usability and accuracy of the test kit were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test kit was implemented using blood samples (leukocyte count; C‑reactive protein, CRP), samples for examining the synovial fluid (white blood cell count, PMN cell differentiation, microbiological culture for incubation over 14 days, alpha-defensin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA, leukocyte esterase test strips) together with information and request forms. Between April 2016 and February 2020 a total of 405 patients were investigated. Within 3 calendar years, the use of the test kit increased from 59% initially to 86%, and finally to 96% of cases in the third calendar year. The leukocyte esterase test strip was reliable in only 72%, due to undifferentiated readability or blood contamination. The costs increased by the only commercially available alpha-defensin ELISA test by approx. 52€ per puncture. The best individual test showed a sensitivity/specificity of 92.8%/95.2% with alpha-defensin. It was calculated which combinations showed a similar test quality and different combinations, such as CRP+ cell count+ microbiology showed a sensitivity/specificity both of around 90%. Metallosis is a challenge for preoperative PJI diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In a prospective study it was shown, that the implementation of the standardized test kit lead to a guideline based PJI diagnostic in all cases and thus to a significantly increase of the diagnostic quality. There is currently no single test that reliably excludes or proves an infection. The alpha-defensin laboratory ELISA test showed the best test accuracy, whereby the consideration of test combinations is obligatory and at the same time safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":49397,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00113-021-01016-4","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurg","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-021-01016-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: The number of primary arthroplasties is increasing and the proportion of revision arthroplasties is becoming increasingly more important. The need for standardized and guideline-based diagnostics for the safe detection of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is becoming apparent. In the past 10 years various organizations have published definitions and diagnostic guidelines. The implementation of an inhouse standard test kit could help to simplify the process and could improve the diagnostic quality.

Method: In 2016 a test kit was compiled in a monocentric prospective study, taking the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria 2014 and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria into account, which also fulfils the definitions of the ICM criteria 2018 and criteria of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society 2021. The test kit was implemented in the clinical setting of a special department for aseptic and septic revision arthroplasty. The usability and accuracy of the test kit were examined.

Results: The test kit was implemented using blood samples (leukocyte count; C‑reactive protein, CRP), samples for examining the synovial fluid (white blood cell count, PMN cell differentiation, microbiological culture for incubation over 14 days, alpha-defensin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA, leukocyte esterase test strips) together with information and request forms. Between April 2016 and February 2020 a total of 405 patients were investigated. Within 3 calendar years, the use of the test kit increased from 59% initially to 86%, and finally to 96% of cases in the third calendar year. The leukocyte esterase test strip was reliable in only 72%, due to undifferentiated readability or blood contamination. The costs increased by the only commercially available alpha-defensin ELISA test by approx. 52€ per puncture. The best individual test showed a sensitivity/specificity of 92.8%/95.2% with alpha-defensin. It was calculated which combinations showed a similar test quality and different combinations, such as CRP+ cell count+ microbiology showed a sensitivity/specificity both of around 90%. Metallosis is a challenge for preoperative PJI diagnostics.

Discussion: In a prospective study it was shown, that the implementation of the standardized test kit lead to a guideline based PJI diagnostic in all cases and thus to a significantly increase of the diagnostic quality. There is currently no single test that reliably excludes or proves an infection. The alpha-defensin laboratory ELISA test showed the best test accuracy, whereby the consideration of test combinations is obligatory and at the same time safe.

在临床常规中实施诊断假体周围感染的标准化临床检测试剂盒。
背景:原发性关节置换术的数量越来越多,翻修性关节置换术的比例越来越重要。为安全检测假体周围关节感染(PJI),对标准化和基于指南的诊断的需求日益明显。在过去的10年里,各种组织发布了定义和诊断指南。内部标准检测试剂盒的实施有助于简化流程,提高诊断质量。方法:2016年,在单中心前瞻性研究中编制了一套检测试剂盒,同时考虑了2014年国际共识会议(ICM)标准和美国传染病学会(IDSA)标准,该标准也符合2018年ICM标准和2021年欧洲骨关节感染学会标准的定义。该测试试剂盒在无菌和脓毒症关节置换术的特殊部门的临床环境中实施。对试剂盒的可用性和准确性进行了检验。结果:检测试剂盒采用血样(白细胞计数;C反应蛋白(CRP)、用于检查滑液的样品(白细胞计数、PMN细胞分化、培养超过14天的微生物培养、α -防御素酶联免疫吸附试验、ELISA、白细胞酯酶试纸条)以及信息和请求表格。2016年4月至2020年2月,共调查了405例患者。在3个日历年内,检测试剂盒的使用率从最初的59%增加到86%,最后在第三个日历年增加到96%。由于未区分的可读性或血液污染,白细胞酯酶试纸的可靠性仅为72%。唯一的市售α -防御素酶联免疫吸附试验的成本增加了大约。每次52欧元。最佳个体检测对α -防御素的敏感性/特异性分别为92.8%/95.2%。计算出哪些组合具有相似的检测质量,以及不同的组合,例如CRP+细胞计数+微生物学的敏感性/特异性均在90%左右。金属中毒是术前PJI诊断的一个挑战。讨论:在一项前瞻性研究中显示,标准化检测试剂盒的实施导致在所有病例中基于指南的PJI诊断,从而显著提高了诊断质量。目前还没有一种检测方法可以可靠地排除或证实感染。α -防御素实验室ELISA测试显示出最好的测试准确性,因此考虑测试组合是强制性的,同时也是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Unfallchirurg
Unfallchirurg 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Unfallchirurg is an internationally recognised publication organ. The journal deals with all aspects of accident surgery and reconstruction surgery and serves the continuing medical education of surgeons and accident surgeons with own practices and those working in hospitals. Practically-oriented works provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of accident surgery. Besides the imparting of relevant background knowledge, the focus is on the assessment of scientific findings under consideration of practical experience. The reader is given concrete recommendations for his/her practical work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信