Application of a Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment for Local Planning.

IF 4.5 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kyle D Buck, J Kevin Summers
{"title":"Application of a Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment for Local Planning.","authors":"Kyle D Buck, J Kevin Summers","doi":"10.1080/19475705.2020.1828190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The utility of a multi-hazard risk-scape at the county level is significant for county, state, regional, and national policy makers who rely on broad and consistent assessments of hazard exposure and losses. In previous work, the Patterns of Risk using an Integrated Spatial Multi-Hazard (PRISM) approach creates an index of county risk for this purpose. While helpful across large areas, the approach lacks information needed at more localized scales. In this paper, we employ the PRISM approach to all 2015 census tracts in the US. Use of a land-cover approach, with spatial extents and modeled data from 11 natural and 4 technological hazard types, determines spatial exposures. Furthermore, census counts allow for the estimation of population exposures in each tract by hazard type. The results of the tract-level index reveal exposure patterns that contrast the original PRISM model, with a concentration of risk shifting eastward. The distribution of land-cover and population exposure more closely resemble the county index, revealing the importance of scale and land-cover considerations, along with the need for additional investigation of risk drivers. We provide an application of the risk and multi-hazard exposures in two major metropolitan areas to demonstrate utility of the approach at this scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":51283,"journal":{"name":"Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk","volume":"11 1","pages":"2058-2078"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318127/pdf/nihms-1690353.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1828190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The utility of a multi-hazard risk-scape at the county level is significant for county, state, regional, and national policy makers who rely on broad and consistent assessments of hazard exposure and losses. In previous work, the Patterns of Risk using an Integrated Spatial Multi-Hazard (PRISM) approach creates an index of county risk for this purpose. While helpful across large areas, the approach lacks information needed at more localized scales. In this paper, we employ the PRISM approach to all 2015 census tracts in the US. Use of a land-cover approach, with spatial extents and modeled data from 11 natural and 4 technological hazard types, determines spatial exposures. Furthermore, census counts allow for the estimation of population exposures in each tract by hazard type. The results of the tract-level index reveal exposure patterns that contrast the original PRISM model, with a concentration of risk shifting eastward. The distribution of land-cover and population exposure more closely resemble the county index, revealing the importance of scale and land-cover considerations, along with the need for additional investigation of risk drivers. We provide an application of the risk and multi-hazard exposures in two major metropolitan areas to demonstrate utility of the approach at this scale.

在地方规划中应用多重灾害风险评估。
县级多重灾害风险图对于县、州、地区和国家政策制定者来说意义重大,因为他们需要对灾害风险和损失进行广泛而一致的评估。在以前的工作中,"综合空间多灾害风险模式"(PRISM)方法为此创建了县级风险指数。该方法虽然对大面积地区有所帮助,但缺乏更多地方尺度所需的信息。在本文中,我们对美国 2015 年的所有人口普查区采用了 PRISM 方法。利用土地覆盖方法、空间范围以及来自 11 种自然灾害和 4 种技术灾害类型的建模数据,确定了空间风险。此外,通过人口普查计数,还可以按危害类型估算出每个区的人口受灾情况。区级指数的结果显示了与原始 PRISM 模型不同的暴露模式,风险集中向东转移。土地覆被和人口风险分布更接近于县级指数,揭示了规模和土地覆被因素的重要性,以及对风险驱动因素进行更多调查的必要性。我们提供了两个大都市地区的风险和多种灾害暴露的应用,以证明该方法在此规模下的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk
Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk is to address new concepts, approaches and case studies using geospatial and remote sensing techniques to study monitoring, mapping, risk mitigation, risk vulnerability and early warning of natural hazards. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk covers the following topics: - Remote sensing techniques - Natural hazards associated with land, ocean, atmosphere, land-ocean-atmosphere coupling and climate change - Emerging problems related to multi-hazard risk assessment, multi-vulnerability risk assessment, risk quantification and the economic aspects of hazards. - Results of findings on major natural hazards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信