Considering landscape-level processes in ecosystem service assessments.

Jean Paul Metzger, Jaramar Villarreal-Rosas, Andrés F Suárez-Castro, Sofía López-Cubillos, Adrian González-Chaves, Rebecca K Runting, Camila Hohlenwerger, Jonathan R Rhodes
{"title":"Considering landscape-level processes in ecosystem service assessments.","authors":"Jean Paul Metzger,&nbsp;Jaramar Villarreal-Rosas,&nbsp;Andrés F Suárez-Castro,&nbsp;Sofía López-Cubillos,&nbsp;Adrian González-Chaves,&nbsp;Rebecca K Runting,&nbsp;Camila Hohlenwerger,&nbsp;Jonathan R Rhodes","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The provision of ecosystem services is inherently spatial. Landscape structure affects service provision through multiple landscape-level processes, such as fragmentation, edge and connectivity effects. These processes can affect areas of ecosystem service supply and demand, and the flows linking those areas. Despite the emergence of sophisticated spatial ecosystem service assessments in the last two decades, we show through a literature review that landscape-level processes are still rarely considered in a comprehensive way. Even when they are considered, landscape effects are mostly limited to landscape composition, and configuration effects are underrepresented. Furthermore, most studies infer ecosystem service provision by only evaluating supply, ignoring demand and flows. Here we present a simple conceptual framework that illustrates how to incorporate landscape-level processes in the assessment of the different components of the service provision chain (supply, demand and flows). Using simulations, we evaluated how estimations of ecosystem service provision change when considering different landscape processes and discussed the implications of disregarding landscape effects. However, to fully implement the framework, a series of challenges linked to mapping and quantifying supply and demand, defining adequate scales of analysis, measuring flows, and parameterizing models for different types of services, still need to be overcome. To promote an adequate use and management of ecosystem services, it is essential to better incorporate landscape processes in ecosystem service assessments. This will lead to more quantitatively accurate and spatially precise estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":504449,"journal":{"name":"The Science of the total environment","volume":" ","pages":"149028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Science of the total environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

The provision of ecosystem services is inherently spatial. Landscape structure affects service provision through multiple landscape-level processes, such as fragmentation, edge and connectivity effects. These processes can affect areas of ecosystem service supply and demand, and the flows linking those areas. Despite the emergence of sophisticated spatial ecosystem service assessments in the last two decades, we show through a literature review that landscape-level processes are still rarely considered in a comprehensive way. Even when they are considered, landscape effects are mostly limited to landscape composition, and configuration effects are underrepresented. Furthermore, most studies infer ecosystem service provision by only evaluating supply, ignoring demand and flows. Here we present a simple conceptual framework that illustrates how to incorporate landscape-level processes in the assessment of the different components of the service provision chain (supply, demand and flows). Using simulations, we evaluated how estimations of ecosystem service provision change when considering different landscape processes and discussed the implications of disregarding landscape effects. However, to fully implement the framework, a series of challenges linked to mapping and quantifying supply and demand, defining adequate scales of analysis, measuring flows, and parameterizing models for different types of services, still need to be overcome. To promote an adequate use and management of ecosystem services, it is essential to better incorporate landscape processes in ecosystem service assessments. This will lead to more quantitatively accurate and spatially precise estimates.

考虑生态系统服务评价中的景观级过程。
生态系统服务的提供本质上是空间的。景观结构通过破碎化效应、边缘效应和连通性效应等多个景观层面的过程影响服务提供。这些过程可以影响生态系统服务供应和需求的领域,以及连接这些领域的流量。尽管在过去的二十年中出现了复杂的空间生态系统服务评估,但我们通过文献综述表明,景观层面的过程仍然很少被全面考虑。即使考虑到它们,景观效果也大多局限于景观构成,而配置效果的代表性不足。此外,大多数研究仅通过评估供给来推断生态系统服务提供,而忽略了需求和流量。在这里,我们提出了一个简单的概念框架,说明了如何在评估服务供给链(供应、需求和流)的不同组件时合并景观级流程。通过模拟,我们评估了在考虑不同景观过程时生态系统服务提供的估算值是如何变化的,并讨论了忽略景观效应的影响。然而,为了充分实施该框架,仍然需要克服一系列挑战,包括绘制和量化供求关系、定义适当的分析尺度、测量流量以及为不同类型的服务参数化模型。为了促进生态系统服务的充分利用和管理,必须更好地将景观过程纳入生态系统服务评估。这将导致在数量上和空间上更精确的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书