Pain Intensity Assessment in Sickle Cell Disease Patients Using Vital Signs During Hospital Visits.

Swati Padhee, Amanuel Alambo, Tanvi Banerjee, Arvind Subramaniam, Daniel M Abrams, Gary K Nave, Nirmish Shah
{"title":"Pain Intensity Assessment in Sickle Cell Disease Patients Using Vital Signs During Hospital Visits.","authors":"Swati Padhee,&nbsp;Amanuel Alambo,&nbsp;Tanvi Banerjee,&nbsp;Arvind Subramaniam,&nbsp;Daniel M Abrams,&nbsp;Gary K Nave,&nbsp;Nirmish Shah","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-68790-8_7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) is often associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and high healthcare costs. The standard method for predicting the absence, presence, and intensity of pain has long been self-report. However, medical providers struggle to manage patients based on subjective pain reports correctly and pain medications often lead to further difficulties in patient communication as they may cause sedation and sleepiness. Recent studies have shown that objective physiological measures can predict subjective self-reported pain scores for inpatient visits using machine learning (ML) techniques. In this study, we evaluate the generalizability of ML techniques to data collected from 50 patients over an extended period across three types of hospital visits (i.e., inpatient, outpatient and outpatient evaluation). We compare five classification algorithms for various pain intensity levels at both intra-individual (within each patient) and inter-individual (between patients) level. While all the tested classifiers perform much better than chance, a Decision Tree (DT) model performs best at predicting pain on an 11-point severity scale (from 0-10) with an accuracy of 0.728 at an inter-individual level and 0.653 at an intra-individual level. The accuracy of DT significantly improves to 0.941 on a 2-point rating scale (i.e., no/mild pain: 0-5, severe pain: 6-10) at an inter-individual level. Our experimental results demonstrate that ML techniques can provide an objective and quantitative evaluation of pain intensity levels for all three types of hospital visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":93349,"journal":{"name":"Pattern Recognition : ICPR International Workshops and Challenges, virtual event, January 10-15, 2021, proceedings. Part I. International Conference on Pattern Recognition (25th : 2021 : Online)","volume":"12662 ","pages":"77-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319918/pdf/nihms-1715101.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pattern Recognition : ICPR International Workshops and Challenges, virtual event, January 10-15, 2021, proceedings. Part I. International Conference on Pattern Recognition (25th : 2021 : Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68790-8_7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) is often associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and high healthcare costs. The standard method for predicting the absence, presence, and intensity of pain has long been self-report. However, medical providers struggle to manage patients based on subjective pain reports correctly and pain medications often lead to further difficulties in patient communication as they may cause sedation and sleepiness. Recent studies have shown that objective physiological measures can predict subjective self-reported pain scores for inpatient visits using machine learning (ML) techniques. In this study, we evaluate the generalizability of ML techniques to data collected from 50 patients over an extended period across three types of hospital visits (i.e., inpatient, outpatient and outpatient evaluation). We compare five classification algorithms for various pain intensity levels at both intra-individual (within each patient) and inter-individual (between patients) level. While all the tested classifiers perform much better than chance, a Decision Tree (DT) model performs best at predicting pain on an 11-point severity scale (from 0-10) with an accuracy of 0.728 at an inter-individual level and 0.653 at an intra-individual level. The accuracy of DT significantly improves to 0.941 on a 2-point rating scale (i.e., no/mild pain: 0-5, severe pain: 6-10) at an inter-individual level. Our experimental results demonstrate that ML techniques can provide an objective and quantitative evaluation of pain intensity levels for all three types of hospital visits.

用生命体征评估镰状细胞病患者住院期间的疼痛强度
镰状细胞病(SCD)的疼痛通常与发病率、死亡率增加和高医疗费用相关。长期以来,预测疼痛的缺失、存在和强度的标准方法一直是自我报告。然而,医疗服务提供者很难根据主观疼痛报告正确地管理患者,并且止痛药通常会导致患者沟通的进一步困难,因为它们可能导致镇静和嗜睡。最近的研究表明,使用机器学习(ML)技术,客观生理测量可以预测住院患者主观自我报告的疼痛评分。在这项研究中,我们评估了机器学习技术在三种类型的医院就诊(即住院、门诊和门诊评估)中收集的50名患者数据的普遍性。我们比较了个体内(每个患者)和个体间(患者之间)不同疼痛强度水平的五种分类算法。虽然所有被测试的分类器的表现都比随机要好得多,但决策树(DT)模型在11分严重程度量表(从0-10)上预测疼痛方面表现最好,在个体间水平上的准确率为0.728,在个体内水平上的准确率为0.653。在2点量表(即无/轻度疼痛:0-5,重度疼痛:6-10)的个体间水平上,DT的准确性显著提高至0.941。我们的实验结果表明,机器学习技术可以为所有三种类型的医院就诊提供客观和定量的疼痛强度水平评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信