Serious Complications After Epidural Catheter Placement: Two Case Reports.

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2021-07-24 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S324362
Ronald Seidel, Marc Tietke, Oliver Heese, Uwe Walter
{"title":"Serious Complications After Epidural Catheter Placement: Two Case Reports.","authors":"Ronald Seidel,&nbsp;Marc Tietke,&nbsp;Oliver Heese,&nbsp;Uwe Walter","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S324362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is a standard procedure in multimodal analgesia applied in major thoracic and abdominal surgeries. Two cases are presented with serious complications related to TEA. In both cases, earlier reaction of the treating physicians to patient-reported sensory symptoms could have prevented the complicated course. The first case was a 73-year-old patient with bronchial carcinoma who underwent right lower lobe resection. In this case, dabigatran 150 mg/d (indication: permanent atrial fibrillation) had been discontinued 72 hours before surgery, and enoxaparin 80 mg (every 12 hours) had been started 11 hours after surgery. An epidural hematoma developed postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed only after paraplegia had developed the next day. Unfortunately, delayed hematoma evacuation could not prevent persistent paraplegia in this case, which was complicated by hospital-acquired pneumonia with sepsis and acute renal failure. The second case was a 39-year-old patient with ulcerative colitis and an initially undetected malposition of the epidural catheter. Immediately after test bolus injection, the patient reported paresthesia and overall discomfort, which however could not be safely attributed to either the test dose or the already started general anesthesia. The patient could only be extubated after stopping the epidural infusion. Accidental re-start of epidural infusion led to coma, conjugate eye deviation, and respiratory arrest, necessitating re-intubation. Computed tomography (CT) ruled out intracerebral pathology and showed a catheter position centrally in the spinal canal. Fortunately, no neurological deficits were detected after catheter removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"14 ","pages":"117-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/d4/lra-14-117.PMC8318213.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S324362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is a standard procedure in multimodal analgesia applied in major thoracic and abdominal surgeries. Two cases are presented with serious complications related to TEA. In both cases, earlier reaction of the treating physicians to patient-reported sensory symptoms could have prevented the complicated course. The first case was a 73-year-old patient with bronchial carcinoma who underwent right lower lobe resection. In this case, dabigatran 150 mg/d (indication: permanent atrial fibrillation) had been discontinued 72 hours before surgery, and enoxaparin 80 mg (every 12 hours) had been started 11 hours after surgery. An epidural hematoma developed postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed only after paraplegia had developed the next day. Unfortunately, delayed hematoma evacuation could not prevent persistent paraplegia in this case, which was complicated by hospital-acquired pneumonia with sepsis and acute renal failure. The second case was a 39-year-old patient with ulcerative colitis and an initially undetected malposition of the epidural catheter. Immediately after test bolus injection, the patient reported paresthesia and overall discomfort, which however could not be safely attributed to either the test dose or the already started general anesthesia. The patient could only be extubated after stopping the epidural infusion. Accidental re-start of epidural infusion led to coma, conjugate eye deviation, and respiratory arrest, necessitating re-intubation. Computed tomography (CT) ruled out intracerebral pathology and showed a catheter position centrally in the spinal canal. Fortunately, no neurological deficits were detected after catheter removal.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

硬膜外置管后严重并发症2例报告。
胸廓硬膜外镇痛(TEA)是胸腹外科手术中多模式镇痛的一种标准方法。两例出现与TEA相关的严重并发症。在这两种情况下,治疗医生对患者报告的感觉症状的早期反应可能会阻止复杂的过程。第一个病例是一位73岁的支气管癌患者,他接受了右下叶切除术。本例患者术前72小时停用达比加群150mg /d(适应症:永久性房颤),术后11小时开始使用依诺肝素80mg(每12小时一次)。术后出现硬膜外血肿。仅在截瘫发展的第二天才进行磁共振成像(MRI)。不幸的是,延迟血肿清除不能防止该病例的持续性截瘫,并并发医院获得性肺炎合并败血症和急性肾功能衰竭。第二个病例是一名39岁的溃疡性结肠炎患者,最初未发现硬膜外导管位置错误。试验丸注射后,患者立即报告感觉异常和全身不适,然而,这不能安全地归因于试验剂量或已经开始全身麻醉。患者只有在停止硬膜外输注后才能拔管。意外重新开始硬膜外输注导致昏迷、共轭眼偏差和呼吸停止,需要重新插管。计算机断层扫描(CT)排除了脑内病理,并显示导管位于椎管中央。幸运的是,拔管后未发现神经功能缺损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信