Tissue Atomization by High Intensity Focused Ultrasound.

Julianna Simon, Oleg Sapozhnikov, Vera Khokhlova, Yak-Nam Wang, Lawrence Crum, Michael Bailey
{"title":"Tissue Atomization by High Intensity Focused Ultrasound.","authors":"Julianna Simon,&nbsp;Oleg Sapozhnikov,&nbsp;Vera Khokhlova,&nbsp;Yak-Nam Wang,&nbsp;Lawrence Crum,&nbsp;Michael Bailey","doi":"10.1109/ultsym.2012.0251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liquid atomization and fountain formation by focused ultrasound was first published by Wood and Loomis [1]. Since then, the cavitation-wave hypothesis emerged to explain atomization in a fountain, which states atomization arises from a combination of surface capillary waves and the collapse of cavitation bubbles. More recently, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been shown to fractionate tissue through either pulsed-cavitation or millisecond boiling histotripsy therapies; however it is unclear how millimeter-size boiling bubbles or cavitation bubble clouds fractionate tissue into submicron-size fragments. The objective of this work is to test the hypothesis experimentally that atomization and fountain formation occurs similarly in liquids and tissues and results in tissue erosion. A 2-MHz HIFU transducer operating at peak <i>in situ</i> pressures of 50 MPa and -11 MPa (linear intensity = 14,000 W/cm<sup>2</sup>) was focused at the interface between a liquid or tissue and air. A high-speed camera was used to monitor atomization and fountain formation in water, ethanol, glycerol, bovine liver, and porcine blood clots. The <i>in situ</i> linear intensity threshold for consistent atomization in one 10-ms pulse increased in the order: ethanol (180 W/cm<sup>2</sup>) < blood clot (250 W/cm<sup>2</sup>) < water (350 W/cm<sup>2</sup>) < liver (6200 W/cm<sup>2</sup>); glycerol did not atomize. Average jet velocities for the initial spray at the maximum acoustic intensity were similar for all materials and on the order of 20 m/s. The tissue erosion rate of liver approached saturation at around 300 10-ms pulses repeated at 1 Hz, which had an average erosion volume of 25.7±10.9 mm<sup>3</sup>. While tissue atomization and fountain formation does not completely mimic what is observed in liquids, atomization provides a plausible explanation of how tissue is fractionated in millisecond boiling and possibly even cavitation cloud histotrispy therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73288,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium","volume":"2012 ","pages":"1003-1006"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/ultsym.2012.0251","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ultsym.2012.0251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Liquid atomization and fountain formation by focused ultrasound was first published by Wood and Loomis [1]. Since then, the cavitation-wave hypothesis emerged to explain atomization in a fountain, which states atomization arises from a combination of surface capillary waves and the collapse of cavitation bubbles. More recently, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been shown to fractionate tissue through either pulsed-cavitation or millisecond boiling histotripsy therapies; however it is unclear how millimeter-size boiling bubbles or cavitation bubble clouds fractionate tissue into submicron-size fragments. The objective of this work is to test the hypothesis experimentally that atomization and fountain formation occurs similarly in liquids and tissues and results in tissue erosion. A 2-MHz HIFU transducer operating at peak in situ pressures of 50 MPa and -11 MPa (linear intensity = 14,000 W/cm2) was focused at the interface between a liquid or tissue and air. A high-speed camera was used to monitor atomization and fountain formation in water, ethanol, glycerol, bovine liver, and porcine blood clots. The in situ linear intensity threshold for consistent atomization in one 10-ms pulse increased in the order: ethanol (180 W/cm2) < blood clot (250 W/cm2) < water (350 W/cm2) < liver (6200 W/cm2); glycerol did not atomize. Average jet velocities for the initial spray at the maximum acoustic intensity were similar for all materials and on the order of 20 m/s. The tissue erosion rate of liver approached saturation at around 300 10-ms pulses repeated at 1 Hz, which had an average erosion volume of 25.7±10.9 mm3. While tissue atomization and fountain formation does not completely mimic what is observed in liquids, atomization provides a plausible explanation of how tissue is fractionated in millisecond boiling and possibly even cavitation cloud histotrispy therapies.

高强度聚焦超声组织雾化。
聚焦超声的液体雾化和喷泉形成最早由Wood和Loomis发表[1]。从那时起,出现了空化波假说来解释喷泉中的原子化,该假说认为,原子化是由表面毛细波和空化泡的崩溃结合而产生的。最近,高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)已被证明可以通过脉冲空化或毫秒沸腾组织切片治疗来分离组织;然而,目前尚不清楚毫米大小的沸腾气泡或空化气泡云是如何将组织分解成亚微米大小的碎片的。这项工作的目的是通过实验来验证这样一个假设,即雾化和喷泉形成在液体和组织中发生相似,并导致组织侵蚀。在50 MPa和-11 MPa(线性强度= 14000 W/cm2)的峰值原位压力下工作的2 mhz HIFU传感器聚焦在液体或组织与空气之间的界面上。高速摄像机用于监测水、乙醇、甘油、牛肝和猪血块中的雾化和喷泉形成。在一个10-ms脉冲中,一致雾化的原位线性强度阈值依次增大:乙醇(180 W/cm2) <血凝块(250 W/cm2) <水(350 W/cm2) <肝脏(6200 W/cm2);甘油不雾化。在最大声强下,所有材料初始喷雾的平均喷射速度相似,约为20 m/s。以1 Hz频率重复300次10-ms脉冲时,肝脏组织侵蚀率接近饱和,平均侵蚀体积为25.7±10.9 mm3。虽然组织雾化和喷泉形成并不能完全模拟在液体中观察到的情况,但雾化为组织在毫秒沸腾甚至可能是空化云历史疗法中如何分离提供了合理的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信