Perceptions of chiropractic students regarding interprofessional health care teams.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Matthew J Knieper, Judy L Bhatti, Elissa J Twist Dc
{"title":"Perceptions of chiropractic students regarding interprofessional health care teams.","authors":"Matthew J Knieper, Judy L Bhatti, Elissa J Twist Dc","doi":"10.7899/JCE-20-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe perceptions of knowledge of interprofessional teams and value of interprofessional education (IPE) among 3 distinct years of chiropractic students at 1 chiropractic college.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 24-item cross-sectional survey was administered to 247 chiropractic students in years 1-3 within a single institution. Surveys included 5 demographic questions and the 19-item Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS). The RIPLS collected information on perceptions and value of interprofessional health care in a health care training program. Each question is scored on a 1-5 scale, with 5 indicating a stronger agreement. Multivariable analysis was used for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of a total 321 eligible students, 247 (148 male) students completed the survey from year 1 (n = 66), year 2 (n = 102), and year 3 (n = 79), respectively. Most students (68%) were 18-25 years old. The mean compiled score of all 3 years (n = 231) was 77.2 (SD = 9.1). Each individual's year scores were as follows: year 1 (n = 60, mean = 79.7, SD=7.4), year 2 (n = 95, mean = 76.9, SD = 9.1), and year 3 (n = 76, mean = 75.4, SD = 9.9). Of the 247 students who responded, 87% of participantsagreed with \"shared learning with other health care students will increase my ability to understand clinical problems.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most participants demonstrated a positive response to IPE and collaborating with health care teams. Participants in earlier years demonstrated a more positive response compared to later years. While positive perceptions to IPE were demonstrated, chiropractic students lacked knowledge and understanding of their role within an interprofessional health care team.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895838/pdf/i2374-250X-36-1-30.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-20-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe perceptions of knowledge of interprofessional teams and value of interprofessional education (IPE) among 3 distinct years of chiropractic students at 1 chiropractic college.

Methods: A 24-item cross-sectional survey was administered to 247 chiropractic students in years 1-3 within a single institution. Surveys included 5 demographic questions and the 19-item Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS). The RIPLS collected information on perceptions and value of interprofessional health care in a health care training program. Each question is scored on a 1-5 scale, with 5 indicating a stronger agreement. Multivariable analysis was used for comparison.

Results: Out of a total 321 eligible students, 247 (148 male) students completed the survey from year 1 (n = 66), year 2 (n = 102), and year 3 (n = 79), respectively. Most students (68%) were 18-25 years old. The mean compiled score of all 3 years (n = 231) was 77.2 (SD = 9.1). Each individual's year scores were as follows: year 1 (n = 60, mean = 79.7, SD=7.4), year 2 (n = 95, mean = 76.9, SD = 9.1), and year 3 (n = 76, mean = 75.4, SD = 9.9). Of the 247 students who responded, 87% of participantsagreed with "shared learning with other health care students will increase my ability to understand clinical problems."

Conclusion: Most participants demonstrated a positive response to IPE and collaborating with health care teams. Participants in earlier years demonstrated a more positive response compared to later years. While positive perceptions to IPE were demonstrated, chiropractic students lacked knowledge and understanding of their role within an interprofessional health care team.

脊骨神经科学生对跨专业医疗团队的看法。
目的描述1所脊骨神经科学学院3个不同年级的脊骨神经科学专业学生对跨专业团队知识和跨专业教育(IPE)价值的看法:方法: 我们对同一所院校的 247 名一至三年级脊骨神经科学专业学生进行了一项包含 24 个项目的横断面调查。调查包括5个人口统计学问题和19个项目的跨专业学习准备量表(RIPLS)。RIPLS 收集了有关医疗培训项目中对跨专业医疗保健的看法和价值的信息。每个问题的评分标准为 1-5 分,5 分表示比较一致。采用多变量分析进行比较:在总共 321 名符合条件的学生中,有 247 名学生(148 名男生)完成了调查,分别来自一年级(66 人)、二年级(102 人)和三年级(79 人)。大多数学生(68%)的年龄在 18-25 岁之间。所有三年级学生(n = 231)的平均综合得分为 77.2(SD = 9.1)。每个人的年级得分如下:第一年(n = 60,平均分 = 79.7,SD = 7.4),第二年(n = 95,平均分 = 76.9,SD = 9.1),第三年(n = 76,平均分 = 75.4,SD = 9.9)。在回答问题的 247 名学生中,87% 的参与者同意 "与其他医护学生共同学习将提高我理解临床问题的能力":大多数参与者对 IPE 和与医疗团队合作表现出积极的反应。与晚年学员相比,早年学员的反应更为积极。虽然脊骨神经科学生对IPE表现出了积极的看法,但他们对自己在跨专业医疗团队中的角色缺乏了解和认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信