Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Sleep Disturbance and Fatigue Following Acquired Brain Injury: Predictors of Treatment Response.

Lucy Ymer, Adam McKay, Dana Wong, Kate Frencham, Natalie Grima, Joanna Tran, Sylvia Nguyen, Jennie Ponsford
{"title":"Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Sleep Disturbance and Fatigue Following Acquired Brain Injury: Predictors of Treatment Response.","authors":"Lucy Ymer,&nbsp;Adam McKay,&nbsp;Dana Wong,&nbsp;Kate Frencham,&nbsp;Natalie Grima,&nbsp;Joanna Tran,&nbsp;Sylvia Nguyen,&nbsp;Jennie Ponsford","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify factors associated with treatment response to cognitive behavioral therapy for sleep disturbance and fatigue (CBT-SF) after acquired brain injury (ABI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community dwelling.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Thirty participants with a traumatic brain injury or stroke randomized to receive CBT-SF in a parent randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Participants took part in a parallel-groups, parent randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment, comparing an 8-week CBT-SF program with an attentionally equivalent health education control. They were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, 2 months post-treatment, and 4 months post-treatment. The study was completed either face-to-face or via telehealth (videoconferencing). Following this trial, a secondary analysis of variables associated with treatment response to CBT-SF was conducted, including: demographic variables; injury-related variables; neuropsychological characteristics; pretreatment sleep disturbance, fatigue, depression, anxiety and pain; and mode of treatment delivery (face-to-face or telehealth).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Greater treatment response to CBT-SF at 4-month follow-up was associated with higher baseline sleep and fatigue symptoms. Reductions in fatigue on the FSS were also related to injury mechanism, where those with a traumatic brain injury had a more rapid and short-lasting improvement in fatigue, compared with those with stroke, who had a delayed but longer-term reduction in fatigue. Mode of treatment delivery did not significantly impact CBT-SF outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight potential differences between fatigue trajectories in traumatic brain injury and stroke, and also provide preliminary support for the equivalence of face-to-face and telehealth delivery of CBT-SF in individuals with ABI.</p>","PeriodicalId":519229,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"E220-E230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To identify factors associated with treatment response to cognitive behavioral therapy for sleep disturbance and fatigue (CBT-SF) after acquired brain injury (ABI).

Setting: Community dwelling.

Participants: Thirty participants with a traumatic brain injury or stroke randomized to receive CBT-SF in a parent randomized controlled trial.

Design: Participants took part in a parallel-groups, parent randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment, comparing an 8-week CBT-SF program with an attentionally equivalent health education control. They were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, 2 months post-treatment, and 4 months post-treatment. The study was completed either face-to-face or via telehealth (videoconferencing). Following this trial, a secondary analysis of variables associated with treatment response to CBT-SF was conducted, including: demographic variables; injury-related variables; neuropsychological characteristics; pretreatment sleep disturbance, fatigue, depression, anxiety and pain; and mode of treatment delivery (face-to-face or telehealth).

Main measures: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS).

Results: Greater treatment response to CBT-SF at 4-month follow-up was associated with higher baseline sleep and fatigue symptoms. Reductions in fatigue on the FSS were also related to injury mechanism, where those with a traumatic brain injury had a more rapid and short-lasting improvement in fatigue, compared with those with stroke, who had a delayed but longer-term reduction in fatigue. Mode of treatment delivery did not significantly impact CBT-SF outcomes.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight potential differences between fatigue trajectories in traumatic brain injury and stroke, and also provide preliminary support for the equivalence of face-to-face and telehealth delivery of CBT-SF in individuals with ABI.

认知行为疗法治疗获得性脑损伤后的睡眠障碍和疲劳:治疗反应的预测因子。
目的:探讨认知行为疗法治疗获得性脑损伤(ABI)后睡眠障碍和疲劳(CBT-SF)疗效的相关因素。环境:社区住宅。参与者:在父母随机对照试验中,30名创伤性脑损伤或中风患者随机接受CBT-SF。设计:参与者参加平行组,父母随机对照试验,盲法结果评估,比较8周的CBT-SF项目和注意力相等的健康教育对照。分别在基线、治疗后、治疗后2个月和治疗后4个月进行评估。研究通过面对面或远程医疗(视频会议)完成。在该试验之后,对与CBT-SF治疗反应相关的变量进行了二次分析,包括:人口统计学变量;与伤害有关的变量;神经心理特征;预处理睡眠障碍、疲劳、抑郁、焦虑、疼痛;以及提供治疗的方式(面对面或远程医疗)。主要测量方法:匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)。结果:在4个月的随访中,CBT-SF治疗效果越好,基线睡眠和疲劳症状越高。FSS上疲劳的减轻也与损伤机制有关,与中风患者相比,创伤性脑损伤患者的疲劳改善更快,持续时间更短,而中风患者的疲劳减轻时间较晚,但时间较长。治疗方式对CBT-SF结果没有显著影响。结论:我们的研究结果突出了创伤性脑损伤和卒中患者疲劳轨迹之间的潜在差异,并为ABI患者面对面和远程医疗提供CBT-SF的等效性提供了初步支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信