Comparative Assessment of Autogenous Cancellous Bone Graft and Bovine-Derived Demineralized Bone Matrix for Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

Vijay Kumar, Vidya Rattan, Sachin Rai, Satinder Pal Singh, Jai Kumar Mahajan
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of Autogenous Cancellous Bone Graft and Bovine-Derived Demineralized Bone Matrix for Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.","authors":"Vijay Kumar,&nbsp;Vidya Rattan,&nbsp;Sachin Rai,&nbsp;Satinder Pal Singh,&nbsp;Jai Kumar Mahajan","doi":"10.1177/10556656211025197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Comparison between bovine-derived demineralized bone matrix (DMBM) and iliac crest graft over long term for secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in terms of radiological and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, parallel groups, double-blind, controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Health Science Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty patients with UCLP.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were allocated into group I (Iliac crest bone graft) and group II (DMBM) for SABG. Outcomes were assessed at 2 weeks, 6 months, and then after mean follow-up period of 63 months.</p><p><strong>Outcomes measures: </strong>Volumetric analysis of the grafted bone in the alveolar cleft site was done through cone beam computed tomography using Cavalieri principle and modified assessment tool. Clinical assessment was performed in terms of pain, swelling, duration of hospital stay, cost of surgery, alar base symmetry, and donor site morbidity associated with iliac crest harvesting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Volumetric analysis through Cavalieri principle revealed comparable bone uptake at follow-up of 6 months between group I (70%) and group II (69%). Modified assessment tool showed no significant difference between horizontal and vertical bone scores over short- and long-term follow-up. In group II, there was higher cost of surgery, but no donor site morbidity unlike group I.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Demineralized bone matrix proved analogous to iliac crest bone graft as per volumetric analysis over shorter period. However, although statistically insignificant, net bone volume achieved was lower than the iliac crest graft at longer follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":520794,"journal":{"name":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","volume":" ","pages":"833-840"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10556656211025197","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211025197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: Comparison between bovine-derived demineralized bone matrix (DMBM) and iliac crest graft over long term for secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in terms of radiological and clinical outcomes.

Design: Prospective, randomized, parallel groups, double-blind, controlled trial.

Setting: Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Health Science Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh.

Participants: Twenty patients with UCLP.

Interventions: Patients were allocated into group I (Iliac crest bone graft) and group II (DMBM) for SABG. Outcomes were assessed at 2 weeks, 6 months, and then after mean follow-up period of 63 months.

Outcomes measures: Volumetric analysis of the grafted bone in the alveolar cleft site was done through cone beam computed tomography using Cavalieri principle and modified assessment tool. Clinical assessment was performed in terms of pain, swelling, duration of hospital stay, cost of surgery, alar base symmetry, and donor site morbidity associated with iliac crest harvesting.

Results: Volumetric analysis through Cavalieri principle revealed comparable bone uptake at follow-up of 6 months between group I (70%) and group II (69%). Modified assessment tool showed no significant difference between horizontal and vertical bone scores over short- and long-term follow-up. In group II, there was higher cost of surgery, but no donor site morbidity unlike group I.

Conclusions: Demineralized bone matrix proved analogous to iliac crest bone graft as per volumetric analysis over shorter period. However, although statistically insignificant, net bone volume achieved was lower than the iliac crest graft at longer follow-up.

自体松质骨与牛源脱矿骨基质用于单侧唇腭裂患者二次牙槽骨移植的比较研究。
目的:比较牛源脱矿骨基质(DMBM)和髂骨移植长期应用于单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者继发性牙槽骨移植(SABG)的影像学和临床效果。设计:前瞻性、随机、平行组、双盲、对照试验。单位:昌迪加尔医学教育与研究研究生院口腔健康科学中心口腔颌面外科单元。参与者:20例UCLP患者。干预措施:将患者分为I组(髂骨骨移植)和II组(DMBM)进行SABG。分别在2周、6个月和平均随访63个月后评估结果。结果测量:采用卡瓦列里原理和改进的评估工具,通过锥形束计算机断层扫描对牙槽骨裂部位的移植物骨进行体积分析。临床评估包括疼痛、肿胀、住院时间、手术费用、鼻翼基部对称性和与髂骨切除相关的供体部位发病率。结果:卡瓦列里原理的体积分析显示,随访6个月时,I组(70%)和II组(69%)的骨摄取相当。改良后的评估工具在短期和长期随访中显示水平和垂直骨评分无显著差异。II组手术费用较高,但与i组相比,无供体部位发病率。结论:根据体积分析,脱矿骨基质与髂骨移植物在较短时间内相似。然而,尽管统计上不显著,但在较长的随访期间,获得的净骨体积低于髂骨移植物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信