[Complication rate after femoral shaft fractures in childhood and adolescence depending on patient factors and treatment measures].

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Chirurg Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-16 DOI:10.1007/s00104-021-01437-2
S Oberthür, S Piatek, H Krause, H Rüther, P J Roch, A Zoch, W Lehmann, S Sehmisch, M R Klauser
{"title":"[Complication rate after femoral shaft fractures in childhood and adolescence depending on patient factors and treatment measures].","authors":"S Oberthür,&nbsp;S Piatek,&nbsp;H Krause,&nbsp;H Rüther,&nbsp;P J Roch,&nbsp;A Zoch,&nbsp;W Lehmann,&nbsp;S Sehmisch,&nbsp;M R Klauser","doi":"10.1007/s00104-021-01437-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures has undergone an increasing change in recent years. The previously predominant treatment procedures were extensively replaced by minimally invasive techniques (e.g. elastic stable intramedullary nailing, ESIN). The aim of this study was the comparison of complication rates depending on patient factors as well as various treatment procedures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study involved a retrospective X‑ray morphometric evaluation of data. The patient files and X‑rays of 101 children who were treated at 2 level I trauma centers were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conservative treatment was carried out in 19% of the cases. Among the surgical procedures the ESIN technique was predominant (n = 60). Complications that needed revision occurred in 10% of the children after conservative treatment. Revision surgery had to be carried out in more than 6% of the cases in children who were surgically treated. Among the surgical procedures ESIN stabilization demonstrated the lowest revision rate with only 3%. Children under three years and adolescents had a higher risk for developing complications. If the ESIN wires used were too thin in relation to the diameter of the medullary cavity there was an increased probability of complications of around 30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed a moderate risk of complications in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children. The risk of complications after external fixation and conservative treatment was the highest in this study. Overall, the ESIN technique showed the lowest risk of complications. The results of this study could confirm the known limitations of the ESIN technique depending on age and body weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":50700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurg","volume":"93 2","pages":"165-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00104-021-01437-2","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurg","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01437-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures has undergone an increasing change in recent years. The previously predominant treatment procedures were extensively replaced by minimally invasive techniques (e.g. elastic stable intramedullary nailing, ESIN). The aim of this study was the comparison of complication rates depending on patient factors as well as various treatment procedures.

Material and methods: This study involved a retrospective X‑ray morphometric evaluation of data. The patient files and X‑rays of 101 children who were treated at 2 level I trauma centers were analyzed.

Results: Conservative treatment was carried out in 19% of the cases. Among the surgical procedures the ESIN technique was predominant (n = 60). Complications that needed revision occurred in 10% of the children after conservative treatment. Revision surgery had to be carried out in more than 6% of the cases in children who were surgically treated. Among the surgical procedures ESIN stabilization demonstrated the lowest revision rate with only 3%. Children under three years and adolescents had a higher risk for developing complications. If the ESIN wires used were too thin in relation to the diameter of the medullary cavity there was an increased probability of complications of around 30%.

Conclusion: This study revealed a moderate risk of complications in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children. The risk of complications after external fixation and conservative treatment was the highest in this study. Overall, the ESIN technique showed the lowest risk of complications. The results of this study could confirm the known limitations of the ESIN technique depending on age and body weight.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

[儿童和青少年股骨干骨折并发症发生率取决于患者因素和治疗措施]。
背景:近年来,小儿股骨干骨折的治疗方法发生了越来越多的变化。以前主要的治疗方法被微创技术广泛取代(例如弹性稳定髓内钉,ESIN)。本研究的目的是比较并发症的发生率取决于患者的因素和不同的治疗程序。材料和方法:本研究对资料进行回顾性X线形态计量学评价。分析了101例在2个一级创伤中心接受治疗的儿童的病历和X线照片。结果:保守治疗占19%。ESIN技术在外科手术中占主导地位(n = 60)。10%的患儿在保守治疗后出现需要翻修的并发症。在接受手术治疗的儿童中,超过6%的病例必须进行翻修手术。在外科手术中,ESIN稳定的翻修率最低,仅为3%。三岁以下儿童和青少年患并发症的风险更高。如果使用的ESIN丝相对于髓腔的直径太细,则并发症的可能性增加约30%。结论:本研究揭示了儿童股骨干骨折治疗并发症的中等风险。外固定及保守治疗后并发症风险最高。总体而言,ESIN技术显示出最低的并发症风险。本研究的结果可以证实ESIN技术在年龄和体重方面的已知局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chirurg
Chirurg 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen The magazine is intended for surgeons in hospitals, clinics and research. Each issue includes a comprehensive theme: Practical summaries access to selected topics and provide the reader with a compilation of current knowledge in all fields of surgery. Besides imparting relevant background knowledge, the emphasis is on the review of scientific results and practical experience. The reader will find concrete recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信