Association Between Primary Headache and Bruxism: An Updated Systematic Review.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jéssica Conti Réus, Helena Polmann, Beatriz Dulcineia Mendes Souza, Carlos Flores-Mir, Paulo Cesar Trevisol Bittencourt, Efraim Winocur, Jeffrey Okeson, Graziela De Luca Canto
{"title":"Association Between Primary Headache and Bruxism: An Updated Systematic Review.","authors":"Jéssica Conti Réus,&nbsp;Helena Polmann,&nbsp;Beatriz Dulcineia Mendes Souza,&nbsp;Carlos Flores-Mir,&nbsp;Paulo Cesar Trevisol Bittencourt,&nbsp;Efraim Winocur,&nbsp;Jeffrey Okeson,&nbsp;Graziela De Luca Canto","doi":"10.11607/ofph.2745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To answer the question: among observational studies, is there any association between primary headaches and bruxism in adults?</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review of observational studies was performed. The search was performed in seven main databases and three gray literature databases. Studies in which samples were composed of adult patients were included. Primary headaches were required to be diagnosed by the International Classification of Headache Disorders. Any diagnostic method for bruxism was accepted. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool and the Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (MAStARI) tool. Associations were analyzed by calculating odds ratios (OR) in Review Manager 5.3 software. The evidence certainty was screened by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 544 articles reviewed, 5 met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. The included studies evaluated both awake and sleep bruxism, as well as tension-type headaches and migraines as primary headaches. Among two migraine studies, one showed an OR of 1.79 (95% CI: 0.96 to 3.33) and another 1.97 (95% CI: 1.5 to 2.55). On the other hand, among three tension-type headache studies, there was a positive association only with awake bruxism, with an OR of 5.23 (95% CI: 2.57 to 10.65). All included articles had a positive answer for more than 60% of the risk of bias questions. The evidence certainty varied between low and very low. Due to high heterogeneity among the studies, it was impossible to perform a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with awake bruxism have from 5 to 17 times more chance of having tension-type headaches. Sleep bruxism did not have any association with tension-type headache, and the association with migraines is controversial.</p>","PeriodicalId":48800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","volume":"35 2","pages":"129-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.2745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Aims: To answer the question: among observational studies, is there any association between primary headaches and bruxism in adults?

Materials and methods: A systematic review of observational studies was performed. The search was performed in seven main databases and three gray literature databases. Studies in which samples were composed of adult patients were included. Primary headaches were required to be diagnosed by the International Classification of Headache Disorders. Any diagnostic method for bruxism was accepted. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool and the Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (MAStARI) tool. Associations were analyzed by calculating odds ratios (OR) in Review Manager 5.3 software. The evidence certainty was screened by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria.

Results: Of the 544 articles reviewed, 5 met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. The included studies evaluated both awake and sleep bruxism, as well as tension-type headaches and migraines as primary headaches. Among two migraine studies, one showed an OR of 1.79 (95% CI: 0.96 to 3.33) and another 1.97 (95% CI: 1.5 to 2.55). On the other hand, among three tension-type headache studies, there was a positive association only with awake bruxism, with an OR of 5.23 (95% CI: 2.57 to 10.65). All included articles had a positive answer for more than 60% of the risk of bias questions. The evidence certainty varied between low and very low. Due to high heterogeneity among the studies, it was impossible to perform a meta-analysis.

Conclusion: Patients with awake bruxism have from 5 to 17 times more chance of having tension-type headaches. Sleep bruxism did not have any association with tension-type headache, and the association with migraines is controversial.

原发性头痛和磨牙症之间的关系:一项最新的系统综述。
目的:回答以下问题:在观察性研究中,成人原发性头痛和磨牙症之间是否存在关联?材料和方法:对观察性研究进行系统回顾。在7个主要数据库和3个灰色文献数据库中进行检索。包括由成年患者组成样本的研究。原发性头痛需要根据国际头痛疾病分类进行诊断。磨牙症的任何诊断方法均被接受。使用Joanna Briggs研究所关键评估工具和统计荟萃分析评估和回顾工具(MAStARI)工具评估偏倚风险。通过在Review Manager 5.3软件中计算比值比(OR)来分析关联。证据的确定性通过推荐评分、评估、发展和评价标准进行筛选。结果:544篇文献中有5篇符合定性分析的纳入标准。纳入的研究评估了清醒和睡眠磨牙症,以及紧张性头痛和偏头痛作为原发性头痛。在两项偏头痛研究中,一项显示OR为1.79 (95% CI: 0.96至3.33),另一项显示OR为1.97 (95% CI: 1.5至2.55)。另一方面,在三项紧张性头痛研究中,仅与清醒磨牙症呈正相关,OR为5.23 (95% CI: 2.57至10.65)。所有纳入的文章都对超过60%的偏倚风险问题给出了肯定的答案。证据确定性在低和非常低之间变化。由于研究之间存在高度异质性,因此无法进行meta分析。结论:清醒磨牙症患者发生紧张性头痛的几率是正常患者的5 ~ 17倍。睡眠磨牙症与紧张性头痛没有任何关系,与偏头痛的关系是有争议的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Founded upon sound scientific principles, this journal continues to make important contributions that strongly influence the work of dental and medical professionals involved in treating oral and facial pain, including temporomandibular disorders, and headache. In addition to providing timely scientific research and clinical articles, the journal presents diagnostic techniques and treatment therapies for oral and facial pain, headache, mandibular dysfunction, and occlusion and covers pharmacology, physical therapy, surgery, and other pain-management methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信