Validation of the Temporomandibular Disorder Pain Screener in a Specialized Headache Center.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hedwig A van der Meer, Merete Bakke, Henrik W Schytz, Bjarne Kjeldgaard Madsen
{"title":"Validation of the Temporomandibular Disorder Pain Screener in a Specialized Headache Center.","authors":"Hedwig A van der Meer,&nbsp;Merete Bakke,&nbsp;Henrik W Schytz,&nbsp;Bjarne Kjeldgaard Madsen","doi":"10.11607/ofph.2787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of the TMD pain screener in a headache population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Danish Headache Center (DHC). Patients were included if they had primary or secondary headache, trigeminal neuralgia, or facial pain. The pain screener was compared to the outcome of a full Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 62 headache patients were included (77% women). The sensitivity of the pain screener short version (three questions) was 85% (95% CI: 70% to 94%), and the specificity was 64% (95% CI: 41% to 83%). In the full version (six questions), the sensitivity was 83% (95% CI: 67% to 93%), and the specificity was 82% (95% CI: 60% to 95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TMD pain screener seems to be a valid tool to accurately screen for the presence of TMD to provide the most optimal treatment for headache patients. These findings should however be confirmed in a larger sample with migraine, tension-type headache, and trigeminal neuralgia.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.2787","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of the TMD pain screener in a headache population.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Danish Headache Center (DHC). Patients were included if they had primary or secondary headache, trigeminal neuralgia, or facial pain. The pain screener was compared to the outcome of a full Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) examination.

Results: A total of 62 headache patients were included (77% women). The sensitivity of the pain screener short version (three questions) was 85% (95% CI: 70% to 94%), and the specificity was 64% (95% CI: 41% to 83%). In the full version (six questions), the sensitivity was 83% (95% CI: 67% to 93%), and the specificity was 82% (95% CI: 60% to 95%).

Conclusion: The TMD pain screener seems to be a valid tool to accurately screen for the presence of TMD to provide the most optimal treatment for headache patients. These findings should however be confirmed in a larger sample with migraine, tension-type headache, and trigeminal neuralgia.

颞下颌紊乱疼痛筛查在一个专门的头痛中心的验证。
目的:探讨TMD疼痛筛查在头痛人群中的敏感性和特异性。方法:在丹麦头痛中心(DHC)进行横断面研究。如果患者有原发性或继发性头痛、三叉神经痛或面部疼痛,则纳入研究。将疼痛筛查结果与TMD完整诊断标准(DC/TMD)检查结果进行比较。结果:共纳入62例头痛患者(77%为女性)。疼痛筛查简短版(三个问题)的敏感性为85% (95% CI: 70%至94%),特异性为64% (95% CI: 41%至83%)。在完整版本(6个问题)中,敏感性为83% (95% CI: 67%至93%),特异性为82% (95% CI: 60%至95%)。结论:TMD疼痛筛查仪是一种有效的工具,可以准确地筛查TMD的存在,为头痛患者提供最佳的治疗方案。然而,这些发现应该在更大的偏头痛、紧张性头痛和三叉神经痛的样本中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信