["They always think you're a killer"-slaughterhouse workers' reactions to moral stigma].

IF 0.4 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Marcel Sebastian
{"title":"[\"They always think you're a killer\"-slaughterhouse workers' reactions to moral stigma].","authors":"Marcel Sebastian","doi":"10.1007/s11614-021-00450-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Slaughterhouse work has a bad reputation and many slaughterhouse workers experience moral stigmatization, although meat consumption is the dominant diet in Western societies. So far, moral stigmatization of slaughterhouse workers has not been analyzed systematically. The article answers the following research questions: Which coping strategies regarding moral stigmatization can be found among slaughterhouse workers and how do these strategies relate to hegemonic narratives about their job? The article answers the research questions using concepts from sociological theories of culture, stigma and <i>dirty work</i> and is based on a qualitative content analysis of 13 problem-centered interviews with workers from six German slaughterhouses. The analysis showed that slaughterhouse workers are responding to moral stigmatization by questioning the cultural ideas on which stigmatization is based and by arguing for the validity of their own cultural ideas about \"slaughter animals\". The interviewed slaughterhouse workers also use rigid group boundaries to delegitimize the authority of external actors to judge slaughterhouse work. The article is innovative because it systematically analyzes how slaughterhouse workers cope with moral stigmatization.</p>","PeriodicalId":42381,"journal":{"name":"Osterreichische Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie","volume":"46 2","pages":"207-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11614-021-00450-3","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osterreichische Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-021-00450-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Slaughterhouse work has a bad reputation and many slaughterhouse workers experience moral stigmatization, although meat consumption is the dominant diet in Western societies. So far, moral stigmatization of slaughterhouse workers has not been analyzed systematically. The article answers the following research questions: Which coping strategies regarding moral stigmatization can be found among slaughterhouse workers and how do these strategies relate to hegemonic narratives about their job? The article answers the research questions using concepts from sociological theories of culture, stigma and dirty work and is based on a qualitative content analysis of 13 problem-centered interviews with workers from six German slaughterhouses. The analysis showed that slaughterhouse workers are responding to moral stigmatization by questioning the cultural ideas on which stigmatization is based and by arguing for the validity of their own cultural ideas about "slaughter animals". The interviewed slaughterhouse workers also use rigid group boundaries to delegitimize the authority of external actors to judge slaughterhouse work. The article is innovative because it systematically analyzes how slaughterhouse workers cope with moral stigmatization.

“他们总是认为你是个杀手”——屠宰场工人对道德耻辱的反应。
尽管肉类消费是西方社会的主要饮食,但屠宰场工作名声不佳,许多屠宰场工人经历了道德上的耻辱。到目前为止,还没有对屠宰场工人的道德污名化进行系统的分析。本文回答了以下研究问题:在屠宰场工人中可以找到哪些应对道德污名的策略,这些策略如何与他们工作的霸权叙事相关?本文利用文化、耻辱和肮脏工作的社会学理论的概念回答了研究问题,并基于对来自六个德国屠宰场的工人的13个问题为中心的访谈的定性内容分析。分析表明,屠宰场工人对道德污名化的反应是质疑污名化所依据的文化观念,并为自己关于“屠宰动物”的文化观念的有效性辩护。接受采访的屠宰场工人还使用严格的群体界限来剥夺外部行为者判断屠宰场工作的权威。这篇文章的创新之处在于它系统地分析了屠宰场工人如何应对道德污名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie (ÖZS) – Austrian Journal of Sociology was founded in 1976 by the Österreichische Gesellschaft für Soziologie (ÖGS) (“Austrian Sociological Association”). The ÖZS is an academic journal aiming at promoting current debates as well as the exchange of new developments and insights in sociological and social-science research. Its contributions cover the entire range of sociological issues and approaches, including interdisciplinary ones. It is managed by an independent editorial team guaranteeing its autonomy with an international Advisory Board. The ÖZS publishes double-blind peer-reviewed original research articles in German and English from all areas of sociology, including theoretical, empirical, and methodological articles. Research notes (short representations of unpublished, completed projects of broad interest), book reviews, and contributions in response to previous publications in the ÖZS complement each of the four annual issues. Every second issue contains publications on a topical focus. In addition, supplements are published on specific topics on the initiative of sociologists who are not necessarily members of the editorial board. The planning and publication of these special issues are carried out in cooperation with the editors, who also check the issue’s compliance with quality standards. The journal’s target audience encompasses sociologists and social scientists in related fields. The editors support early career sociologists through preliminary evaluation of submitted manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信