Comparative Analysis of Early versus Late Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography in Cases of Cholelithiasis with Choledocholithiasis.

Apoorv Goel, Shyam Kothari, Roli Bansal
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Early versus Late Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography in Cases of Cholelithiasis with Choledocholithiasis.","authors":"Apoorv Goel,&nbsp;Shyam Kothari,&nbsp;Roli Bansal","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A preferred treatment for cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), which can be performed early (within 72 hours) or can be delayed for 6 to 8 weeks. This study is conducted to compare and analyze the outcome of early versus late LC following common bile duct (CBD) clearance by ERCP and determine the optimum timing for performing LC post-ERCP.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This comparative analysis was conducted at St Joseph Hospital, Ghaziabad, from September 2019 to March 2021 on 89 cases of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Patients were divided into two groups. Group I (<i>n</i> = 45) patients underwent early LC within 72 hours post-ERCP and group II (<i>n</i> = 44) patients underwent late LC after an interval of 8 weeks. Various preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative clinical parameters like operative difficulty, complications, surgery duration, hospital stay, and conversion to open cholecystectomy were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in demographic and laboratory findings in both groups. Group I patients had significantly shorter hospital stay and less operative difficulty. The duration of surgery was significantly low in group I. There was no significant difference in rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early LC post-ERCP is associated with short hospital stay and duration of surgery and less operative difficulty and complications. Therefore, we recommend that LC can be safely performed within 48 to 72 hours after ERCP.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Goel A, Kothari S, Bansal R. Comparative Analysis of Early versus Late Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography in Cases of Cholelithiasis with Choledocholithiasis. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2021;11(1):11-13.</p>","PeriodicalId":11992,"journal":{"name":"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology","volume":"11 1","pages":"11-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/4a/ejohg-11-11.PMC8286358.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: A preferred treatment for cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), which can be performed early (within 72 hours) or can be delayed for 6 to 8 weeks. This study is conducted to compare and analyze the outcome of early versus late LC following common bile duct (CBD) clearance by ERCP and determine the optimum timing for performing LC post-ERCP.

Materials and methods: This comparative analysis was conducted at St Joseph Hospital, Ghaziabad, from September 2019 to March 2021 on 89 cases of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Patients were divided into two groups. Group I (n = 45) patients underwent early LC within 72 hours post-ERCP and group II (n = 44) patients underwent late LC after an interval of 8 weeks. Various preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative clinical parameters like operative difficulty, complications, surgery duration, hospital stay, and conversion to open cholecystectomy were analyzed.

Results: There was no significant difference in demographic and laboratory findings in both groups. Group I patients had significantly shorter hospital stay and less operative difficulty. The duration of surgery was significantly low in group I. There was no significant difference in rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy.

Conclusion: Early LC post-ERCP is associated with short hospital stay and duration of surgery and less operative difficulty and complications. Therefore, we recommend that LC can be safely performed within 48 to 72 hours after ERCP.

How to cite this article: Goel A, Kothari S, Bansal R. Comparative Analysis of Early versus Late Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography in Cases of Cholelithiasis with Choledocholithiasis. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2021;11(1):11-13.

内镜逆行胆管胰胆管造影后早期与晚期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆石症合并胆总管结石的比较分析。
导言:胆管结石合并胆总管结石的首选治疗方法是内镜逆行胆管胰造影(ERCP),然后进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC),可以早期(72小时内)进行,也可以延迟6 - 8周进行。本研究旨在比较和分析经ERCP清除总胆管(CBD)后早期和晚期LC的结果,并确定ERCP后LC的最佳时机。材料与方法:对2019年9月至2021年3月在加济阿巴德圣约瑟夫医院就诊的89例胆石症合并胆石管结石患者进行对比分析。患者分为两组。第一组(n = 45)患者在ercp后72小时内接受早期LC,第二组(n = 44)患者在间隔8周后接受晚期LC。分析术前、围手术期和术后的各种临床参数,如手术难度、并发症、手术时间、住院时间和转开腹胆囊切除术。结果:两组患者的人口学和实验室检查结果无显著差异。I组患者住院时间明显缩短,手术难度明显降低。ⅰ组手术时间明显较短,转开腹胆囊切除术率无显著差异。结论:ercp术后早期LC患者住院时间短,手术时间短,手术难度小,并发症少。因此,我们建议在ERCP术后48 - 72小时内行LC。Goel A, Kothari S, Bansal R.内镜逆行胆管胰胆管造影后早期与晚期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆石症合并胆总管结石的比较分析。中华肝病与胃肠病杂志;2011;11(1):11-13。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信