{"title":"Nasopharyngeal Tube and Functional Treatment in Pierre Robin Sequence: A Tertiary Clinical Experience From 150 Cases.","authors":"Fabian Blanc, Inge Harrewijn, Claire Duflos, Frederica Maggiulli, Guillaume Captier","doi":"10.1177/10556656211031105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the initial care practices for children with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) and analyze the factors predicting the severity of the obstruction breathing disorders.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective single-center study of 150 children with PRS.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single tertiary care center, Regional Competence Center for the diagnosis and treatment of PRS.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 150 children with PRS consecutively followed between 1986 and 2017. Group 1 comprises children without specific respiratory management; group 2, children requiring prone positioning to alleviate their respiratory distress symptoms; and group 3, children requiring nasopharyngeal airway tube (NT) or nonconservative surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Evolution and results of the initial treatment of PRS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two percent (n = 63) were attributed to group 1, 39% (n = 50) to group 2, and 19% (n = 29) to group 3. Preterm birth, birth weight, or associated congenital malformations were not significantly different between the groups. However, the age of exclusive oral feeding was significantly different: 1 day (quartiles: 0-3) for group 1; 11 days (quartiles: 1-28) for group 2; 39 days (quartiles: 19-111) for group 3 (<i>P</i> < .0001). Considering the NT, its use relieves the upper airway obstruction, assessed by a respiratory polygraphy, in 14 children.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nasopharyngeal airway tube has become our major first-line treatment, avoiding more complex procedures in most of the cases. The achievement of exclusive oral feeding seems to be a good predictor of the severity of respiratory symptoms in PRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520794,"journal":{"name":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","volume":" ","pages":"891-898"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10556656211031105","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211031105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the initial care practices for children with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) and analyze the factors predicting the severity of the obstruction breathing disorders.
Design: A retrospective single-center study of 150 children with PRS.
Setting: Single tertiary care center, Regional Competence Center for the diagnosis and treatment of PRS.
Patients: A total of 150 children with PRS consecutively followed between 1986 and 2017. Group 1 comprises children without specific respiratory management; group 2, children requiring prone positioning to alleviate their respiratory distress symptoms; and group 3, children requiring nasopharyngeal airway tube (NT) or nonconservative surgical treatment.
Main outcome measures: Evolution and results of the initial treatment of PRS.
Results: Forty-two percent (n = 63) were attributed to group 1, 39% (n = 50) to group 2, and 19% (n = 29) to group 3. Preterm birth, birth weight, or associated congenital malformations were not significantly different between the groups. However, the age of exclusive oral feeding was significantly different: 1 day (quartiles: 0-3) for group 1; 11 days (quartiles: 1-28) for group 2; 39 days (quartiles: 19-111) for group 3 (P < .0001). Considering the NT, its use relieves the upper airway obstruction, assessed by a respiratory polygraphy, in 14 children.
Conclusions: Nasopharyngeal airway tube has become our major first-line treatment, avoiding more complex procedures in most of the cases. The achievement of exclusive oral feeding seems to be a good predictor of the severity of respiratory symptoms in PRS.