A comparative analysis of state adoption of the Community First Choice program.

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-26 DOI:10.1080/01621424.2021.1947926
Lisa Kalimon Beauregard, Edward Alan Miller
{"title":"A comparative analysis of state adoption of the Community First Choice program.","authors":"Lisa Kalimon Beauregard,&nbsp;Edward Alan Miller","doi":"10.1080/01621424.2021.1947926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last several decades, policymakers have focused on rebalancing Medicaid-funded long-term services and supports toward home and community-based services (HCBS). The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) included several opportunities for states to further promote HCBS options. One optional opportunity for states to expand Medicaid HCBS was the 1915(k) Community First Choice (CFC) program. To date, eight states have elected to add CFC as a Medicaid benefit. This study utilized comparative case studies to identify the factors that influenced states' adoption of CFC. Results highlight the important role that state bureaucrats, economic concerns, and existing HCBS programs had on states' decisions to adopt CFC.</p>","PeriodicalId":45875,"journal":{"name":"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01621424.2021.1947926","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01621424.2021.1947926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Over the last several decades, policymakers have focused on rebalancing Medicaid-funded long-term services and supports toward home and community-based services (HCBS). The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) included several opportunities for states to further promote HCBS options. One optional opportunity for states to expand Medicaid HCBS was the 1915(k) Community First Choice (CFC) program. To date, eight states have elected to add CFC as a Medicaid benefit. This study utilized comparative case studies to identify the factors that influenced states' adoption of CFC. Results highlight the important role that state bureaucrats, economic concerns, and existing HCBS programs had on states' decisions to adopt CFC.

各州采用社区优先选择计划的比较分析。
在过去的几十年里,政策制定者一直致力于重新平衡医疗补助资助的长期服务以及对家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的支持。《患者保护和平价医疗法案》(ACA)为各州提供了进一步推广HCBS方案的若干机会。各州扩大医疗补助HCBS的一个可选机会是1915年(k)社区第一选择(CFC)计划。到目前为止,已有8个州选择将氟氯化碳纳入医疗补助计划。本研究利用比较案例研究来确定影响各国采用氟氯化碳的因素。结果突出了州官僚、经济问题和现有的HCBS项目对各州决定采用氟氯化碳的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY
HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Home Health Care Services Quarterly continues to publish important research on the cutting edge of home care and alternatives to long-term institutional care for the elderly, disabled, and other population groups that use in-home health care and other community services. The journal is aimed toward service providers and health care specialists involved with health care financing, evaluation of services, organization of services, and public policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信