Survey of training experiences and clinical practice in assessment for autism spectrum disorder by neuropsychologists.

The Clinical neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-26 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2021.1948610
Kathryn R Bradbury, Susanne W Duvall, Kira Armstrong, Trevor A Hall
{"title":"Survey of training experiences and clinical practice in assessment for autism spectrum disorder by neuropsychologists.","authors":"Kathryn R Bradbury,&nbsp;Susanne W Duvall,&nbsp;Kira Armstrong,&nbsp;Trevor A Hall","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2021.1948610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary purpose of this study is to better understand current practices in the assessment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) by neuropsychologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 21-item survey regarding ASD assessment beliefs and practices was sent via email through neuropsychology listservs. The survey was accessed by 445 licensed psychologists who identified as neuropsychologists. A total of 367 surveys were deemed usable for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the full sample. Exploratory analyses were conducted between groups of interest, including primary population served (pediatric, adult, or lifespan), primary practice setting (medical center vs. private practice) and years in practice (< 5 years, 5 to 14 years, or 15+ years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents were well-distributed across age range, years in practice, primary practice setting, and primary practice location. Almost all respondents (most of whom self-identified as pediatric-focused clinicians) believe that neuropsychologists should be able to competently rule in or out ASD and most received training in ASD assessment. Approximately 40% of respondents endorsed wanting more training in ASD assessment to increase their competence and confidence in making this differential diagnosis. Minimal differences in ASD beliefs and assessment practices were seen across years of practice or primary practice setting. Pediatric and lifespan clinicians had similar experience with ASD assessment practices, and both generally differed from adult clinicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest many respondents desire further specialty ASD training for neuropsychologists. Additionally, the large majority of respondents indicated that future neuropsychologists should receive training in ASD assessment during graduate school, internship and/or post-doctoral fellowship.</p>","PeriodicalId":197334,"journal":{"name":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"856-873"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13854046.2021.1948610","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1948610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The primary purpose of this study is to better understand current practices in the assessment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) by neuropsychologists.

Methods: A 21-item survey regarding ASD assessment beliefs and practices was sent via email through neuropsychology listservs. The survey was accessed by 445 licensed psychologists who identified as neuropsychologists. A total of 367 surveys were deemed usable for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the full sample. Exploratory analyses were conducted between groups of interest, including primary population served (pediatric, adult, or lifespan), primary practice setting (medical center vs. private practice) and years in practice (< 5 years, 5 to 14 years, or 15+ years).

Results: Respondents were well-distributed across age range, years in practice, primary practice setting, and primary practice location. Almost all respondents (most of whom self-identified as pediatric-focused clinicians) believe that neuropsychologists should be able to competently rule in or out ASD and most received training in ASD assessment. Approximately 40% of respondents endorsed wanting more training in ASD assessment to increase their competence and confidence in making this differential diagnosis. Minimal differences in ASD beliefs and assessment practices were seen across years of practice or primary practice setting. Pediatric and lifespan clinicians had similar experience with ASD assessment practices, and both generally differed from adult clinicians.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest many respondents desire further specialty ASD training for neuropsychologists. Additionally, the large majority of respondents indicated that future neuropsychologists should receive training in ASD assessment during graduate school, internship and/or post-doctoral fellowship.

神经心理学家自闭症谱系障碍评估培训经验及临床实践调查。
目的:本研究的主要目的是更好地了解目前神经心理学家评估自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的做法。方法:通过神经心理学listservs通过电子邮件发送关于ASD评估信念和实践的21项调查。445名有执照的心理学家参与了这项调查,他们被认为是神经心理学家。共有367项调查被认为可用于数据分析。使用描述性统计来描述整个样本。在感兴趣的组之间进行探索性分析,包括主要服务人群(儿科、成人或终身)、主要执业环境(医疗中心与私人执业)和执业年限(< 5年、5至14年或15年以上)。结果:受访者在年龄范围、实践年限、主要实践环境和主要实践地点分布良好。几乎所有的受访者(其中大多数自认为以儿科为重点的临床医生)都认为神经心理学家应该能够胜任排除自闭症谱系障碍,而且大多数人都接受过自闭症谱系障碍评估方面的培训。大约40%的受访者支持需要更多的自闭症谱系障碍评估培训,以提高他们做出这种鉴别诊断的能力和信心。在多年的实践或最初的实践环境中,ASD信念和评估实践的差异很小。儿科和终身临床医生在ASD评估实践方面有相似的经验,但两者通常与成人临床医生不同。结论:我们的研究结果表明,许多受访者希望对神经心理学家进行进一步的ASD专业培训。此外,绝大多数受访者表示,未来的神经心理学家应该在研究生院、实习和/或博士后研究期间接受自闭症谱系障碍评估方面的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书