Development Of a Chronic Stress Diagnosis.

Jarkko Kalliomäki, Gunilla Brodda Jansen
{"title":"Development Of a Chronic Stress Diagnosis.","authors":"Jarkko Kalliomäki,&nbsp;Gunilla Brodda Jansen","doi":"10.2340/20030711-1000064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study discusses a novel diagnosis, \"stress- related exhaustion disorder\", which was introduced in Sweden in 2005. An International Classification of Diseases 10<sup>th</sup> revision (ICD-10) code, F43.8A, was specified for exhaustion disorder. Since then, there has been a remarkable increase in the number of patients diagnosed with exhaustion disorder in Sweden. The scientific basis of the diagnosis, and the putative mechanisms behind its increase, are discussed. It is hypothesized that the following factors may have promoted the increase in exhaustion disorder diagnosis: (<i>i</i>) the widespread perception of exhaustion disorder as a medical condition with physiological impairment of the endocrine and nervous systems, caused by external stressors; (<i>ii</i>) provision of healthcare resources and social insurance benefits for exhaustion disorder, without having firm evidence or guidelines on its management; (<i>iii</i>) highly inclusive diagnostic criteria for exhaustion disorder that overlap with the criteria for several other diagnoses (depression, anxiety disorders, chronic pain disorders), leading to possible bias towards exhaustion disorder diagnosis. The increase in exhaustion disorder does not necessarily reflect an increased stress-related morbidity in society. It is also important to consider factors related to the concept of stress as a disease, the availability and organization of healthcare and social insurance benefits, and diagnostic bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":73929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/41/JRMCC-4-1000064.PMC8292725.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/20030711-1000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study discusses a novel diagnosis, "stress- related exhaustion disorder", which was introduced in Sweden in 2005. An International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) code, F43.8A, was specified for exhaustion disorder. Since then, there has been a remarkable increase in the number of patients diagnosed with exhaustion disorder in Sweden. The scientific basis of the diagnosis, and the putative mechanisms behind its increase, are discussed. It is hypothesized that the following factors may have promoted the increase in exhaustion disorder diagnosis: (i) the widespread perception of exhaustion disorder as a medical condition with physiological impairment of the endocrine and nervous systems, caused by external stressors; (ii) provision of healthcare resources and social insurance benefits for exhaustion disorder, without having firm evidence or guidelines on its management; (iii) highly inclusive diagnostic criteria for exhaustion disorder that overlap with the criteria for several other diagnoses (depression, anxiety disorders, chronic pain disorders), leading to possible bias towards exhaustion disorder diagnosis. The increase in exhaustion disorder does not necessarily reflect an increased stress-related morbidity in society. It is also important to consider factors related to the concept of stress as a disease, the availability and organization of healthcare and social insurance benefits, and diagnostic bias.

慢性压力诊断的发展。
本研究讨论了一种新的诊断,“压力相关衰竭障碍”,这是2005年在瑞典提出的。国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)代码F43.8A被指定为衰竭障碍。从那时起,瑞典被诊断为衰竭障碍的患者数量显著增加。讨论了诊断的科学依据,以及其增加背后的假定机制。据推测,以下因素可能促进了疲惫障碍诊断的增加:(i)人们普遍认为疲惫障碍是一种由外部压力源引起的内分泌和神经系统生理损伤的医学状况;(二)为身心疲惫障碍提供医疗资源和社会保险福利,但没有关于其管理的确凿证据或指导方针;(iii)精疲力竭障碍的高度包容性诊断标准与其他几种诊断标准(抑郁症、焦虑症、慢性疼痛障碍)重叠,导致可能偏向于精疲力竭障碍的诊断。疲劳障碍的增加并不一定反映社会中与压力相关的发病率的增加。同样重要的是要考虑与压力作为一种疾病的概念、医疗保健和社会保险福利的可用性和组织以及诊断偏见有关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信