Investigating Indicators of Waiting Time and Length of Stay in Emergency Departments.

Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM Pub Date : 2021-07-16 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S316366
Nojoud Al Nhdi, Hajar Al Asmari, Abdulellah Al Thobaity
{"title":"Investigating Indicators of Waiting Time and Length of Stay in Emergency Departments.","authors":"Nojoud Al Nhdi,&nbsp;Hajar Al Asmari,&nbsp;Abdulellah Al Thobaity","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S316366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate potential indicators of patients' waiting time and length of stay in emergency departments (ED) at the Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals in order to determine the causes of delayed patient care and to recommend clinical implications to achieve a better ED system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This exploratory study was conducted in the EDs at four tertiary hospitals of MOH. A random sample of 1360 people was tested from December 2019 to February 2020. Data included patient Canadian Triage Acuity and System (CTAS) level, registration time, triage time, physician examination time, decision time, and disposition time. Descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis, multiple linear regression analysis and Pearson correlation were used according to SPSS (version 24).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings showed that 89.6% of total emergency patients were categorized as levels 3, 4 and 5. Around 73.5% of emergency patients stayed less than 4 hours due to registration or triage to disposition, while 26.5% of those patients stayed more than 4 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of patients' total stay in EDs was less than 4 hours. According to ED international standard of length of stay, this is appropriate. The highest effective indicator in total length of stay was the decision to disposition time in EDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":503614,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","volume":"13 ","pages":"311-318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1c/78/oaem-13-311.PMC8291870.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S316366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate potential indicators of patients' waiting time and length of stay in emergency departments (ED) at the Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals in order to determine the causes of delayed patient care and to recommend clinical implications to achieve a better ED system.

Materials and methods: This exploratory study was conducted in the EDs at four tertiary hospitals of MOH. A random sample of 1360 people was tested from December 2019 to February 2020. Data included patient Canadian Triage Acuity and System (CTAS) level, registration time, triage time, physician examination time, decision time, and disposition time. Descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis, multiple linear regression analysis and Pearson correlation were used according to SPSS (version 24).

Results: The findings showed that 89.6% of total emergency patients were categorized as levels 3, 4 and 5. Around 73.5% of emergency patients stayed less than 4 hours due to registration or triage to disposition, while 26.5% of those patients stayed more than 4 hours.

Conclusion: The majority of patients' total stay in EDs was less than 4 hours. According to ED international standard of length of stay, this is appropriate. The highest effective indicator in total length of stay was the decision to disposition time in EDs.

调查急诊科等待时间和住院时间的指标。
目的:探讨卫生部医院急诊科(ED)患者等待时间和住院时间的潜在指标,以确定患者护理延误的原因,并建议临床意义,以实现更好的ED系统。材料与方法:本探索性研究在卫生部四所三级医院的急诊科进行。从2019年12月到2020年2月,对随机抽取的1360人进行了测试。数据包括患者加拿大分诊敏锐度和系统(CTAS)水平、注册时间、分诊时间、医生检查时间、决策时间和处置时间。采用SPSS (version 24)软件进行描述性统计、多变量分析、多元线性回归分析和Pearson相关分析。结果:89.6%的急诊患者分为3、4、5级。73.5%的急诊患者因登记或分流处置而住院时间不足4小时,26.5%的急诊患者住院时间超过4小时。结论:绝大多数患者在急诊科的总住院时间小于4小时。根据ED的国际停留时间标准,这是合适的。总住院时间中最有效的指标是急诊室的处置时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信