Remote Patient Monitoring Identifies the Need for Triage in Patients with Acute COVID-19 Infection.

Laura Tabacof, Jamie Wood, Nicki Mohammadi, Katherine E Link, Jenna Tosto-Mancuso, Sophie Dewil, Erica Breyman, Leila Nasr, Christopher Kellner, David Putrino
{"title":"Remote Patient Monitoring Identifies the Need for Triage in Patients with Acute COVID-19 Infection.","authors":"Laura Tabacof,&nbsp;Jamie Wood,&nbsp;Nicki Mohammadi,&nbsp;Katherine E Link,&nbsp;Jenna Tosto-Mancuso,&nbsp;Sophie Dewil,&nbsp;Erica Breyman,&nbsp;Leila Nasr,&nbsp;Christopher Kellner,&nbsp;David Putrino","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Telehealth was frequently used in the provision of care and remote patient monitoring (RPM) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Precision Recovery Program (PRP) remotely monitored and supported patients with COVID-19 in their home environment. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This was a single-center retrospective cohort study reviewing data acquired from the PRP clinical initiative. <b>Results:</b> Of the 679 patients enrolled in the PRP, 156 patients were screened by a clinician following a deterioration in symptoms and vital signs on a total of 240 occasions, and included in the analyses. Of these 240 occasions, 162 (67%) were escalated to the PRP physician. Thirty-six patients were referred to emergency department, with 12 (7%) admitted to the hospital. The most common risk factors coinciding with hospital admissions were cardiac (67%), age >65 (42%), obesity (25%), and pulmonary (17%). The most common symptoms reported that triggered a screening event were dyspnea/tachypnea (27%), chest pain (14%), and gastrointestinal issues (8%). Vital signs that commonly triggered a screening event were pulse oximetry (15%), heart rate (11%), and temperature (9%). <b>Discussion:</b> Common factors (risk factors, vital signs, and symptoms) among patients requiring screening, triage, and hospitalization were identified, providing clinicians with further information to support decision making when utilizing RPM in this cohort. <b>Conclusion:</b> A clinician-led RPM program for patients with acute COVID-19 infection provided supportive care and screening for deterioration. Similar models should be considered for implementation in COVID-19 cohorts and other conditions at risk of rapid clinical deterioration in the home setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"495-500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: Telehealth was frequently used in the provision of care and remote patient monitoring (RPM) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Precision Recovery Program (PRP) remotely monitored and supported patients with COVID-19 in their home environment. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study reviewing data acquired from the PRP clinical initiative. Results: Of the 679 patients enrolled in the PRP, 156 patients were screened by a clinician following a deterioration in symptoms and vital signs on a total of 240 occasions, and included in the analyses. Of these 240 occasions, 162 (67%) were escalated to the PRP physician. Thirty-six patients were referred to emergency department, with 12 (7%) admitted to the hospital. The most common risk factors coinciding with hospital admissions were cardiac (67%), age >65 (42%), obesity (25%), and pulmonary (17%). The most common symptoms reported that triggered a screening event were dyspnea/tachypnea (27%), chest pain (14%), and gastrointestinal issues (8%). Vital signs that commonly triggered a screening event were pulse oximetry (15%), heart rate (11%), and temperature (9%). Discussion: Common factors (risk factors, vital signs, and symptoms) among patients requiring screening, triage, and hospitalization were identified, providing clinicians with further information to support decision making when utilizing RPM in this cohort. Conclusion: A clinician-led RPM program for patients with acute COVID-19 infection provided supportive care and screening for deterioration. Similar models should be considered for implementation in COVID-19 cohorts and other conditions at risk of rapid clinical deterioration in the home setting.

远程患者监测确定了COVID-19急性感染患者分诊的必要性。
在COVID-19大流行期间,远程医疗经常用于提供护理和远程患者监测(RPM)。精准康复计划(PRP)远程监测COVID-19患者并在其家庭环境中为其提供支持。材料和方法:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,回顾了从PRP临床倡议获得的数据。结果:在纳入PRP的679名患者中,156名患者在总共240次症状和生命体征恶化后由临床医生筛查,并纳入分析。在这240例病例中,162例(67%)升级到PRP医师那里。36例患者转诊至急诊科,其中12例(7%)住院。与住院相关的最常见危险因素是心脏(67%)、年龄>65(42%)、肥胖(25%)和肺部(17%)。引发筛查事件的最常见症状是呼吸困难/呼吸急促(27%)、胸痛(14%)和胃肠道问题(8%)。通常触发筛查事件的生命体征是脉搏血氧饱和度(15%)、心率(11%)和体温(9%)。讨论:确定了需要筛查、分诊和住院的患者的共同因素(危险因素、生命体征和症状),为临床医生在该队列中使用RPM时提供了进一步的信息,以支持决策。结论:临床主导的急性COVID-19感染患者RPM项目提供了支持性护理和恶化筛查。应考虑在COVID-19队列和家庭环境中有快速临床恶化风险的其他条件下实施类似的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信