Barriers and Associated Factors to the Use of Routine Health Information for Decision-Making Among Managers Working at Public Hospitals in North Shewa Zone of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia: A Mixed-Method Study.

IF 3.4 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Gemechu Tulu, Takele Gezahegn Demie, Tesfalem T Tessema
{"title":"Barriers and Associated Factors to the Use of Routine Health Information for Decision-Making Among Managers Working at Public Hospitals in North Shewa Zone of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia: A Mixed-Method Study.","authors":"Gemechu Tulu,&nbsp;Takele Gezahegn Demie,&nbsp;Tesfalem T Tessema","doi":"10.2147/JHL.S314833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Routine health information (RHI) systems are vital for the acquisition of data for health sector planning, monitoring, and evaluation, patient management, health education, resource allocation, disease prioritization, and decision-making. Use RHI for decision-making is low in Ethiopia. Thus, the study aimed to assess barriers and associated factors to the use of RHI among managers working at public hospitals in North Shewa, Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A facility-based mixed-method study was conducted from May to June 2020. A total of 102 randomly selected managers were included in the survey and six key informant interviews were done. Data were collected using a structured self-administered questionnaire and interview guide by trained data collectors. Data were entered into Epi-info version 7.1 and transferred into SPSS version 23 for further statistical analysis. Both bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, a less than 0.05 P-value was considered statistically significant. The odds ratio along with a 95% confidence interval was estimated to measure the strength of the association. Thematic analysis was done for key informant interview data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the level of RHI use for decision-making was 71.6% (95% CI: 61.8%, 79.4%). According to the multivariable logistic regression analysis, training on health information system (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.08-0.98) and supportive supervision (AOR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.09-0.78) were found significantly associated with the use of RHI for decision-making. Moreover, the lack of staff motivation and computer and data analysis skills were the major reasons for not using RHI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three-fourth of the managers working at public hospitals used RHI for decision-making. Training on health information systems and supportive supervision were factors associated with the use of RHI. Therefore, training of managers and the provision of supportive supervision were highly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":44346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","volume":"13 ","pages":"157-167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/eb/24/jhl-13-157.PMC8285226.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S314833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Routine health information (RHI) systems are vital for the acquisition of data for health sector planning, monitoring, and evaluation, patient management, health education, resource allocation, disease prioritization, and decision-making. Use RHI for decision-making is low in Ethiopia. Thus, the study aimed to assess barriers and associated factors to the use of RHI among managers working at public hospitals in North Shewa, Ethiopia.

Methods: A facility-based mixed-method study was conducted from May to June 2020. A total of 102 randomly selected managers were included in the survey and six key informant interviews were done. Data were collected using a structured self-administered questionnaire and interview guide by trained data collectors. Data were entered into Epi-info version 7.1 and transferred into SPSS version 23 for further statistical analysis. Both bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, a less than 0.05 P-value was considered statistically significant. The odds ratio along with a 95% confidence interval was estimated to measure the strength of the association. Thematic analysis was done for key informant interview data.

Results: In this study, the level of RHI use for decision-making was 71.6% (95% CI: 61.8%, 79.4%). According to the multivariable logistic regression analysis, training on health information system (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.08-0.98) and supportive supervision (AOR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.09-0.78) were found significantly associated with the use of RHI for decision-making. Moreover, the lack of staff motivation and computer and data analysis skills were the major reasons for not using RHI.

Conclusion: Three-fourth of the managers working at public hospitals used RHI for decision-making. Training on health information systems and supportive supervision were factors associated with the use of RHI. Therefore, training of managers and the provision of supportive supervision were highly recommended.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚州北谢瓦地区公立医院管理人员使用常规健康信息进行决策的障碍和相关因素:一项混合方法研究。
背景:常规健康信息系统对于获取卫生部门规划、监测和评估、患者管理、健康教育、资源分配、疾病优先级和决策的数据至关重要。在埃塞俄比亚,使用RHI进行决策的比例较低。因此,该研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚北谢瓦公立医院管理人员使用RHI的障碍和相关因素。方法:2020年5月至6月进行了一项基于设施的混合方法研究。共有102名随机选择的管理人员被纳入调查,并进行了六次关键的线人访谈。数据是由经过培训的数据收集员使用结构化的自我管理问卷和访谈指南收集的。数据输入Epi-info 7.1版,并转入SPSS 23版进行进一步的统计分析。进行了双变量和多变量逻辑回归分析。在多元逻辑回归分析中,小于0.05的P值被认为具有统计学意义。比值比和95%的置信区间被估计为衡量关联的强度。对关键线人访谈数据进行了专题分析。结果:在本研究中,RHI用于决策的水平为71.6%(95%CI:61.8%,79.4%)。根据多变量逻辑回归分析,健康信息系统培训(AOR=0.28,95%CI:0.08-0.98)和支持性监督(AOR=0.27,95%CI:0.09-0.78)与RHI用于决策的使用显著相关。结论:公立医院四分之三的管理人员使用RHI进行决策。健康信息系统培训和支持性监督是与RHI使用相关的因素。因此,强烈建议对管理人员进行培训,并提供支助性监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Leadership
Journal of Healthcare Leadership HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Efficient and successful modern healthcare depends on a growing group of professionals working together as an interdisciplinary team. However, many forces shape the delivery of healthcare; changes are being driven by the markets, transformations in concepts of health and wellbeing, technology and research and discovery. Dynamic leadership will guide these necessary transformations. The Journal of Healthcare Leadership is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on leadership for the healthcare professions. The publication strives to amalgamate current and future healthcare professionals and managers by providing key insights into leadership progress and challenges to improve patient care. The journal aspires to inform key decision makers and those professionals with ambitions of leadership and management; it seeks to connect professionals who are engaged in similar endeavours and to provide wisdom from those working in other industries. Senior and trainee doctors, nurses and allied healthcare professionals, medical students, healthcare managers and allied leaders are invited to contribute to this publication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信