Assessment of the Maximal Range of Motion from Initial Sensation of Stretching to the Limits of Tolerance.

IF 2.4
Journal of sports science & medicine Pub Date : 2021-06-15 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI:10.52082/jssm.2021.492
Serge P von Duvillard, Luciana P Carvalho, Sara A Rodrigues, Christian E Cabido, Gustavo H Peixoto, Jeffrey W Bell, Mauro H Chagas, André G P de Andrade
{"title":"Assessment of the Maximal Range of Motion from Initial Sensation of Stretching to the Limits of Tolerance.","authors":"Serge P von Duvillard,&nbsp;Luciana P Carvalho,&nbsp;Sara A Rodrigues,&nbsp;Christian E Cabido,&nbsp;Gustavo H Peixoto,&nbsp;Jeffrey W Bell,&nbsp;Mauro H Chagas,&nbsp;André G P de Andrade","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2021.492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to determine whether the first sensation of stretching (ROM<sub>FSS</sub>) may predict the maximum range of motion (ROM<sub>MAX</sub>) in male (N = 37) and female (N = 32) volunteer subjects, and to assess the reliability of the ROM perceived by subjects in relation to a pre-determined ROM (ROM<sub>50%</sub>). Subjects attempted three experimental sessions with 48 hours between sessions 1 and 2 and 28 days between sessions 1 and 3. Within each session, five trials were performed with isokinetic equipment to assess posterior thigh muscle flexibility. The results revealed a strong and significant correlation between ROM<sub>MAX</sub> and ROM<sub>FSS</sub> for both sexes, females (<i>r</i> = 0.96, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.92) and males (<i>r</i> = 0.91, <i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.82). The accuracy of the model verified by the standard error of estimate (SEE) was high in the equations proposed for both female (SEE = 4.53%) and male (SEE = 5.45%). Our results revealed that ROM<sub>FSS</sub> may predict the ROM<sub>MAX</sub> for both male and female subjects. The ROM<sub>FSS</sub> may contribute to the development of evaluation methods that do not subject the individuals to conditions that may include unnecessary risk of injury and is well suited to monitor the training process of stretching exercises with submaximal loads.</p>","PeriodicalId":520691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sports science & medicine","volume":" ","pages":"492-499"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256523/pdf/jssm-20-492.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sports science & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2021.492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether the first sensation of stretching (ROMFSS) may predict the maximum range of motion (ROMMAX) in male (N = 37) and female (N = 32) volunteer subjects, and to assess the reliability of the ROM perceived by subjects in relation to a pre-determined ROM (ROM50%). Subjects attempted three experimental sessions with 48 hours between sessions 1 and 2 and 28 days between sessions 1 and 3. Within each session, five trials were performed with isokinetic equipment to assess posterior thigh muscle flexibility. The results revealed a strong and significant correlation between ROMMAX and ROMFSS for both sexes, females (r = 0.96, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.92) and males (r = 0.91, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.82). The accuracy of the model verified by the standard error of estimate (SEE) was high in the equations proposed for both female (SEE = 4.53%) and male (SEE = 5.45%). Our results revealed that ROMFSS may predict the ROMMAX for both male and female subjects. The ROMFSS may contribute to the development of evaluation methods that do not subject the individuals to conditions that may include unnecessary risk of injury and is well suited to monitor the training process of stretching exercises with submaximal loads.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

从最初的拉伸感觉到极限的最大运动范围评估。
本研究的目的是确定第一感觉拉伸(ROMFSS)是否可以预测男性(N = 37)和女性(N = 32)志愿者的最大运动范围(ROMMAX),并评估受试者感知到的ROM相对于预先确定的ROM (ROM50%)的可靠性。受试者尝试了三个实验阶段,第1和第2阶段之间间隔48小时,第1和第3阶段之间间隔28天。在每个疗程中,用等速运动设备进行五次试验,以评估大腿后肌的柔韧性。结果显示,ROMMAX与ROMFSS在两性、女性(r = 0.96, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.92)和男性(r = 0.91, p < 0.001;R2 = 0.82)。通过估计的标准误差(SEE)验证,模型的精度在女性(SEE = 4.53%)和男性(SEE = 5.45%)中都很高。我们的研究结果表明ROMFSS可以预测男性和女性受试者的ROMMAX。ROMFSS可能有助于评估方法的发展,这些方法不会使个人受到可能包括不必要的受伤风险的条件,并且非常适合监测次最大负荷拉伸运动的训练过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书